Literature DB >> 2388350

In vivo effects of high energy shock waves on urological tumors: an evaluation of treatment modalities.

G O Oosterhof1, G A Smits, A E de Ruyter, J A Schalken, F M Debruyne.   

Abstract

We have studied the effect of high energy shock waves (HESW) alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs on the growth of urological tumors. The effects of HESW on kidney or prostatic tumors depend largely on the tumor line used. In the rapidly growing prostate tumor no antitumor effect was evident in vivo, but in vitro examination of the in vivo shocked cells showed that the clonogenic potential of HESW treated cells was inhibited. In the more slowly growing tumors, like human kidney xenografts, a temporary growth delay is observed in vivo. The effect on tumor growth depends not only on the number of HESW administered but also on the initial tumor volume. The smaller the tumor burden, the better the antitumor effect. Single shock wave administration may cause a growth delay, and repeated administration leads to a prolonged delay in growth. This effect is temporary and several days after stopping the HESW administration the tumor regains its original growth potential (same doubling time). Finally we could show that tumor growth was suppressed in different tumor models for a longer period by a combination of HESW and a single dose of adriamycin. The effect of combined treatment resulted in a persistent longer doubling time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2388350     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39592-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Effects of high-energy shock waves combined with biological response modifiers or Adriamycin on a human kidney cancer xenograft.

Authors:  G O Oosterhof; G A Smiths; J E deRuyter; J A Schalken; F M Debruyne
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

Review 6.  Sound waves and antineoplastic drugs: The possibility of an enhanced combined anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Loreto B Feril; Takashi Kondo; Shin-Ichiro Umemura; Katsuro Tachibana; Angelo H Manalo; Peter Riesz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  The effect of high-energy shock wave therapy combined with cisplatin on mouse hepatoma.

Authors:  M Maruyama; T Asano; T Uematsu; T Nakagohri; M Hasegawa; H Miyauchi; C Iwashita; Y Tsuchiya; K Isono
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  In vitro interaction of lithotripter shock waves and cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  S Gambihler; M Delius
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Ischemia and loss of ATP in tumours following treatment with focused high energy shock waves.

Authors:  M Dellian; S Walenta; F Gamarra; G E Kuhnle; W Mueller-Klieser; A E Goetz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  High-energy underwater shock wave treatment for internal iliac muscle metastasis of prostatic cancer: a first clinical trial.

Authors:  S Hoshi; S Orikasa; K Suzuki; T Saitoh; T Takahashi; K Yoshikawa; M Kuwahara; M Nose
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1995-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.