Literature DB >> 23883491

Preoperative factors predicting poor outcomes following laparoscopic choledochotomy: a multivariate analysis study.

Xiaoming Ye1, Xiaoming Hong, Kaiyuan Ni, Xiaoping Teng, Kaigang Xie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for common bile duct stones varies procedurally from a transcystic approach to laparoscopic choledochotomy (LC) with or without biliary drainage. However, LC is a difficult procedure with higher documented morbidity than the transcystic approach. We retrospectively investigated risk factors for adverse outcomes of LC.
METHODS: We used logistic regression models to assess 4 categories of adverse outcomes: overall, complications, conversion to open operation and failed surgical clearance. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.
RESULTS: We included 201 patients who underwent LC in our analysis. Adverse outcomes occurred in 48 (23.9%) patients, complications occurred in 43 (21.4%), retained stones were observed in 8 (4%), and conversion to laparotomy occurred in 7 (3.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that total bilirubin (BIL) and the presence of medical risk factors (MRFs) were significant predictors of adverse outcomes and complications. We calculated the probability of adverse outcomes (p) using the following formula: logit(p) = 0.977 (MRFs) + 0.014 (BIL) - 2.919. p = EXP (logit(p)) ÷ [1+EXP (logit(p))]. According to their logit(p), all patients were divided into a low-risk group (logit(p) ≤ -1.32, n = 130) and a high-risk group (logit(p) > -1.32, n = 71). Patients in the low-risk group had about a 1 in 10 chance (12 of 130) of adverse outcomes developing. Of the 71 patients in the high-risk group, 36 (50.7%) experienced adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSION: High BIL and the presence of MRFs could predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23883491      PMCID: PMC3728240          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  18 in total

1.  Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  R Riciardi; S Islam; J J Canete; P L Arcand; M E Stoker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Filippo Baracchi; Claudio Miglietta; Niccolò Furlan; Riccardo Ragona; Aldo Garbarini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  D J Martin; D R Vernon; J Toouli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

4.  Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results.

Authors:  J Ch Berthou; B Dron; Ph Charbonneau; K Moussalier; L Pellissier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Hamish Noble; Elise Whitley; Sally Norton; Michael Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Authors:  Hiromi Tokumura; Akiko Umezawa; Hui Cao; Nobuhide Sakamoto; Yoichi Imaoka; Akio Ouchi; Kyoji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

7.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  G Poole; B Waldron; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M H Thompson; S E Tranter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  An alternative approach of choledocholithotomy via laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  S M Huang; C W Wu; G Y Chau; S C Jwo; W Y Lui; F K P'eng
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identifying predictors of a difficult thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Valerie M Mok; Sarah C Oltmann; Herbert Chen; Rebecca S Sippel; David F Schneider
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Single-stage procedure for the treatment of cholecysto-choledocolithiasis: a surgical procedures review.

Authors:  Aldo Bove; Raffaella Maria Di Renzo; Gino Palone; Domenica Testa; Valentina Malerba; Giuseppe Bongarzoni
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  May predictors of difficulty in thyroid surgery increase the incidence of complications? Prospective study with the proposal of a preoperative score.

Authors:  Valerio D'Orazi; Andrea Sacconi; Silvia Trombetta; Menelaos Karpathiotakis; Daniele Pichelli; Enrico Di Lorenzo; Alice Ortensi; Paolo Urciuoli; Marco Biffoni; Andrea Ortensi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.