| Literature DB >> 23883300 |
Shushu Wang1, Yi Zhang, Xinhua Yang, Linjun Fan, Xiaowei Qi, Qingqiu Chen, Jun Jiang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast conservation therapy (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) can improve patients' quality of life. Currently used intraoperative examination for negative margins may not be sufficient to detect microresidual foci, which are a risk factor for local recurrence. This study was conducted to investigate the shrinking pattern of breast cancer and residual tumors as a risk factor for BCS after NCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23883300 PMCID: PMC3728037 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Patients’ clinical characteristics
| Age (yr) | | |
| ≤ 40 | 18 | 20.0 |
| 41 to 60 | 65 | 72.2 |
| >60 | 7 | 7.8 |
| Chemotherapy (cycle) | | |
| ≤ 4 | 80 | 88.9 |
| >4 | 10 | 11.1 |
| T staging | | |
| T1 | 14 | 15.6 |
| T2 | 63 | 70.0 |
| T3 | 13 | 14.4 |
Figure 1Three types of residual cancers. (A) Type I residual cancer. Solitary residual breast cancer can be seen (arrow). There is a large quantity of lymphocyte infiltration in the margin of the cancer lesion. There are no residual cancer cells, cancer cell clumps or satellite lesions near the cancer lesion. (B) Type II residual cancer. Two residual cancer lesions can be seen (arrows), and there is fibrotic change between the lesions. (C) Type III residual tumor. Solitary residual lesion (C1, arrow) and satellite lesion 1.5 cm away from the main lesion (C2, arrow) can be seen (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification, ×40).
Relationship between types of residual tumor with age and menstrual status
| Type I | 55 | 12 (21.8) | 39 (70.9) | 4 (7.3) | 22 (20.0) | 33 (80.0) |
| Type II | 30 | 4 (13.3) | 24 (80.0) | 2 (6.7) | 17 (56.7) | 13 (43.3) |
| Type III | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 3 (60.0) | 1 (20.0) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) |
| | | | | 3.465 | ||
| 0.393 | 0.177 | |||||
aKruskal-Wallis test and χ2 test.
Relationship between types of residual tumor and expression of ERa, PRa and HER2b
| Type I | 21 (38.2) | 34 (61.8) | 2.032 | 0.362 | 22 (40.0) | 33 (60.0) | 0.378 | 0.828 |
| Type II | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) | 10 (33.3) | 20 (66.7) | ||||
| Type III | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| Type I | 13 (23.6) | 42 (76.4) | 0.499 | 0.779 | 13 (23.6) | 42 (76.4) | 0.153 | 0.926 |
| Type II | 9 (30.0) | 21 (70.0) | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) | ||||
| Type III | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| Type I | 32 (58.2) | 23 (41.8) | 0.743 | 0.154 | 39 (70.9) | 16 (29.1) | 1.142 | 0.565 |
| Type II | 24 (80.0) | 6 (20.0) | 24 (80.0) | 6 (20.0) | ||||
| Type III | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | ||||
aχ2 test. bKruskal-Wallis test.
Relationship between types of residual tumors and the expression changes
| ER | Increase | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.839 |
| No change | 41 | 20 | 4 | ||
| Decrease | 12 | 8 | 1 | ||
| PR | Increase | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0.891 |
| No change | 36 | 20 | 4 | ||
| Decrease | 13 | 7 | 1 | ||
| HER2 | Increase | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.545 |
| No change | 36 | 22 | 4 | ||
| Decrease | 13 | 6 | 0 | ||
aJonckheere-Terpstra test.