Literature DB >> 15908647

Changes in gene expression associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Juliane Hannemann1, Hendrika M Oosterkamp, Cathy A J Bosch, Arno Velds, Lodewyk F A Wessels, Claudette Loo, Emiel J Rutgers, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Marc J van de Vijver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: At present, clinically useful markers predicting response of primary breast carcinomas to either doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) or doxorubicin-docetaxel (AD) are lacking. We investigated whether gene expression profiles of the primary tumor could be used to predict treatment response to either of those chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a single-institution, randomized, phase II trial, patients with locally advanced breast cancer received six courses of either AC (n = 24) or AD (n = 24) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression profiles were generated from core-needle biopsies obtained before treatment and correlated with the response of the primary tumor to the chemotherapy administered. Additionally, pretreatment gene expression profiles were compared with those in tumors remaining after chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Ten (20%) of 48 patients showed a (near) pathologic complete remission of the primary tumor after treatment. No gene expression pattern correlating with response could be identified for all patients or for the AC or AD groups separately. The comparison of the pretreatment biopsy and the tumor excised after chemotherapy revealed differences in gene expression in tumors that showed a partial remission but not in tumors that did not respond to chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: No gene expression profile predicting the response of primary breast carcinomas to AC- or AD-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be detected in this interim analysis. More subtle differences in gene expression are likely to be present but can only be reliably identified by studying a larger group of patients. Response of a breast tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in alterations in gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908647     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  45 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  Molecular profiling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon R Morris; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  [Individualizing treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer].

Authors:  T Liersch; H Rothe; B M Ghadimi; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  How does genome sequencing impact surgery?

Authors:  Marlies S Reimers; Charla C Engels; Peter J K Kuppen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Gerrit J Liefers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  17p12 deletion in breast cancer predicts resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wonshik Han; Jung Hoon Woo; Yoon Kyung Jeon; Song-Ju Yang; Jihyoung Cho; Eunyoung Ko; Tae-You Kim; Seock-Ah Im; DO-Youn Oh; In-Ae Park; Ki-Tae Hwang; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test.

Authors:  Annuska M Glas; Arno Floore; Leonie J M J Delahaye; Anke T Witteveen; Rob C F Pover; Niels Bakx; Jaana S T Lahti-Domenici; Tako J Bruinsma; Marc O Warmoes; René Bernards; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Laura J Van't Veer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Feasibility of FDG PET/CT to monitor the response of axillary lymph node metastases to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Tjeerd S Aukema; Renato A Valdes Olmos; Emiel J T Rutgers; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs; Margaret E Schot; Wouter V Vogel; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M E Straver; E J Th Rutgers; S Rodenhuis; S C Linn; C E Loo; J Wesseling; N S Russell; H S A Oldenburg; N Antonini; M T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.