PURPOSE: Using a novel automated perimetry technique, we tested the hypothesis that older adults will have increased latency and decreased accuracy of saccades, as well as higher visual thresholds, to peripheral visual stimuli when compared with younger adults. METHODS: We tested 20 healthy subjects aged 18 to 30 years ("young") and 21 healthy subjects at least 60 years old ("older") for detection of briefly flashed peripheral stimuli of differing sizes in eight locations along the horizontal meridian (±4°, ±12°, ±20°, and ±28°). With the left eye occluded, subjects were instructed to look quickly toward any seen stimuli. Right eye movements were recorded with an EyeLink 1000 infrared camera system. Limiting our analysis to the four stimulus positions in the nasal hemifield (-4°, -12°, -20°, and -28°), we evaluated for group-level differences in saccadic latency, accuracy, and visual threshold at each stimulus location. RESULTS: Saccadic latency increased as stimulus size decreased in both groups. Older subjects had significantly increased saccadic latencies (at all locations; P < 0.05), decreased accuracies (at all locations; P < 0.05), and higher visual thresholds (at the -12°, -20°, and -28° locations; P < 0.05). Additionally, there were significant relationships between visual threshold and latency, visual threshold and accuracy, and latency and accuracy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have increased latency and decreased accuracy of saccades, as well as higher visual thresholds, to peripheral visual stimuli when compared with younger adults. Saccadic latency and accuracy are related to visual threshold, suggesting that saccadic latency and accuracy could be useful as perimetric outcome measures.
PURPOSE: Using a novel automated perimetry technique, we tested the hypothesis that older adults will have increased latency and decreased accuracy of saccades, as well as higher visual thresholds, to peripheral visual stimuli when compared with younger adults. METHODS: We tested 20 healthy subjects aged 18 to 30 years ("young") and 21 healthy subjects at least 60 years old ("older") for detection of briefly flashed peripheral stimuli of differing sizes in eight locations along the horizontal meridian (±4°, ±12°, ±20°, and ±28°). With the left eye occluded, subjects were instructed to look quickly toward any seen stimuli. Right eye movements were recorded with an EyeLink 1000 infrared camera system. Limiting our analysis to the four stimulus positions in the nasal hemifield (-4°, -12°, -20°, and -28°), we evaluated for group-level differences in saccadic latency, accuracy, and visual threshold at each stimulus location. RESULTS: Saccadic latency increased as stimulus size decreased in both groups. Older subjects had significantly increased saccadic latencies (at all locations; P < 0.05), decreased accuracies (at all locations; P < 0.05), and higher visual thresholds (at the -12°, -20°, and -28° locations; P < 0.05). Additionally, there were significant relationships between visual threshold and latency, visual threshold and accuracy, and latency and accuracy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have increased latency and decreased accuracy of saccades, as well as higher visual thresholds, to peripheral visual stimuli when compared with younger adults. Saccadic latency and accuracy are related to visual threshold, suggesting that saccadic latency and accuracy could be useful as perimetric outcome measures.
Authors: Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Ian C Murray; Brian W Fleck; Harry M Brash; Mary E Macrae; Lai L Tan; Robert A Minns Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-06-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yuri Agrawal; Raymond Van de Berg; Floris Wuyts; Leif Walther; Mans Magnusson; Esther Oh; Margaret Sharpe; Michael Strupp Journal: J Vestib Res Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.354
Authors: G Thepass; J J M Pel; K A Vermeer; O Creten; S R Bryan; H G Lemij; J van der Steen Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Shekhar K Gadkaree; Daniel Q Sun; Carol Li; Frank R Lin; Luigi Ferrucci; Eleanor M Simonsick; Yuri Agrawal Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2016-09-27
Authors: Eric R Anson; Robin T Bigelow; John P Carey; Quan-Li Xue; Stephanie Studenski; Michael C Schubert; Konrad P Weber; Yuri Agrawal Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: N S Kadavath Meethal; D Mazumdar; R Asokan; M Panday; J van der Steen; K A Vermeer; H G Lemij; R J George; J J M Pel Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Eric R Anson; Robin T Bigelow; John P Carey; Qian-Li Xue; Stephanie Studenski; Michael C Schubert; Yuri Agrawal Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Deepmala Mazumdar; Najiya S Kadavath Meethal; Manish Panday; Rashima Asokan; Gijs Thepass; Ronnie J George; Johannes van der Steen; Johan J M Pel Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 3.283