Literature DB >> 2766083

Eye movement perimetry in glaucoma.

G E Trope1, M Eizenman, E Coyle.   

Abstract

Present-day computerized perimetry is often inaccurate and unreliable owing to the need to maintain central fixation over long periods while repressing the normal response to presentation of peripheral stimuli. We tested a new method of perimetry that does not require prolonged central fixation. During this test eye movements were encouraged on presentation of a peripheral target. Twenty-three eyes were studied with an Octopus perimeter, with a technician monitoring eye movements. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity 23%. The low specificity was due to the technician's inability to accurately monitor small eye movements in the central 6 degrees field. If small eye movements are monitored accurately with an eye tracker, eye movement perimetry could become an alternative method to standard perimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2766083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  10 in total

1.  Perimetric evaluation of saccadic latency, saccadic accuracy, and visual threshold for peripheral visual stimuli in young compared with older adults.

Authors:  David E Warren; Matthew J Thurtell; Joy N Carroll; Michael Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Validity and Repeatability of Saccadic Response Times Across the Visual Field in Eye Movement Perimetry.

Authors:  Johan J M Pel; Michel C M van Beijsterveld; Gijs Thepass; Johannes van der Steen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  The Effect of Cataract on Eye Movement Perimetry.

Authors:  G Thepass; J J M Pel; K A Vermeer; O Creten; S R Bryan; H G Lemij; J van der Steen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.

Authors:  N S Kadavath Meethal; D Mazumdar; R Asokan; M Panday; J van der Steen; K A Vermeer; H G Lemij; R J George; J J M Pel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Eye-Tracking for Clinical Ophthalmology with Virtual Reality (VR): A Case Study of the HTC Vive Pro Eye's Usability.

Authors:  Alexandra Sipatchin; Siegfried Wahl; Katharina Rifai
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter.

Authors:  Deepmala Mazumdar; J J M Pel; Manish Panday; Rashima Asokan; L Vijaya; B Shantha; Ronnie George; J Van Der Steen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Testing of visual field with virtual reality goggles in manual and visual grasp modes.

Authors:  Dariusz Wroblewski; Brian A Francis; Alfredo Sadun; Ghazal Vakili; Vikas Chopra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The Effect of Simulated Visual Field Loss on Optokinetic Nystagmus.

Authors:  Soheil M Doustkouhi; Philip R K Turnbull; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  An Open-source Static Threshold Perimetry Test Using Remote Eye-tracking (Eyecatcher): Description, Validation, and Preliminary Normative Data.

Authors:  Pete R Jones
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability.

Authors:  Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Andrew J Tatham; Pankaj K Agarwal; Ian C Murray; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.