OBJECTIVES: We report a preclinical comparative study of a 96-strand braided flow diverter. METHODS: The 96-strand braided device was compared with the currently commercially available flow diverter with 48 strands. The devices were implanted across the neck of 12 elastase-induced aneurysms in New Zealand White rabbits and followed for 1 and 3 months (n = 6 respectively). Aneurysm occlusion rates, parent artery stenosis and patency of jailed branch occlusions were assessed by angiography, histology and scanning electron microscopy studies. RESULTS: It was feasible to navigate and implant the 96-strand device over the aneurysm orifice in all cases. At follow-up two aneurysms in the 48-strand vs. one in the 96-strand group were not occluded. This aneurysm from the 96-strand group however had a tracheal branch arising from the sac and showed a reverse remodelling of the vascular pouch at 3 months. In the occluded aneurysms, the parent artery was always completely reconstructed and the aneurysm orifice was sealed with neointimal tissue. No in-stent stenosis or jailed branch artery occlusion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 96-strand flow diverter proved to be safe, biocompatible and haemodynamically effective, induced stable occlusion of aneurysms and led to reverse remodelling of the parent artery. KEY POINTS: • Flow diversion has been introduced to improve endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms • A new low-permeability flow diverter is feasible for parent artery reconstruction. • The Silk 96 flow diverter appears effective at inducing aneurysm healing. • The covered branches remained patent at follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: We report a preclinical comparative study of a 96-strand braided flow diverter. METHODS: The 96-strand braided device was compared with the currently commercially available flow diverter with 48 strands. The devices were implanted across the neck of 12 elastase-induced aneurysms in New Zealand White rabbits and followed for 1 and 3 months (n = 6 respectively). Aneurysm occlusion rates, parent artery stenosis and patency of jailed branch occlusions were assessed by angiography, histology and scanning electron microscopy studies. RESULTS: It was feasible to navigate and implant the 96-strand device over the aneurysm orifice in all cases. At follow-up two aneurysms in the 48-strand vs. one in the 96-strand group were not occluded. This aneurysm from the 96-strand group however had a tracheal branch arising from the sac and showed a reverse remodelling of the vascular pouch at 3 months. In the occluded aneurysms, the parent artery was always completely reconstructed and the aneurysm orifice was sealed with neointimal tissue. No in-stent stenosis or jailed branch artery occlusion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 96-strand flow diverter proved to be safe, biocompatible and haemodynamically effective, induced stable occlusion of aneurysms and led to reverse remodelling of the parent artery. KEY POINTS: • Flow diversion has been introduced to improve endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms • A new low-permeability flow diverter is feasible for parent artery reconstruction. • The Silk 96 flow diverter appears effective at inducing aneurysm healing. • The covered branches remained patent at follow-up.
Authors: J Berge; A Biondi; P Machi; H Brunel; L Pierot; J Gabrillargues; K Kadziolka; X Barreau; V Dousset; A Bonafé Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Z Kulcsár; E Houdart; A Bonafé; G Parker; J Millar; A J P Goddard; S Renowden; G Gál; B Turowski; K Mitchell; F Gray; M Rodriguez; R van den Berg; A Gruber; H Desal; I Wanke; D A Rüfenacht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yong Hong Ding; Daying Dai; Debra A Lewis; Mark A Danielson; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2005-08-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: I Szikora; Z Berentei; Z Kulcsar; M Marosfoi; Z S Vajda; W Lee; A Berez; P K Nelson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Fischer; M Aguilar-Pérez; E Henkes; W Kurre; O Ganslandt; H Bäzner; H Henkes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825