Literature DB >> 23880763

Naive-like conversion overcomes the limited differentiation capacity of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Arata Honda1, Masanori Hatori, Michiko Hirose, Chizumi Honda, Haruna Izu, Kimiko Inoue, Ryutaro Hirasawa, Shogo Matoba, Sumie Togayachi, Hiroyuki Miyoshi, Atsuo Ogura.   

Abstract

Although induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are indistinguishable from ES cells in their expression of pluripotent markers, their differentiation into targeted cells is often limited. Here, we examined whether the limited capacity of iPS cells to differentiate into neural lineage cells could be mitigated by improving their base-line level of pluripotency, i.e. by converting them into the so-called "naive" state. In this study, we used rabbit iPS and ES cells because of the easy availability of both cell types and their typical primed state characters. Repeated passages of the iPS cells permitted their differentiation into early neural cell types (neural stem cells, neurons, and glial astrocytes) with efficiencies similar to ES cells. However, unlike ES cells, their ability to differentiate later into neural cells (oligodendrocytes) was severely compromised. In contrast, after these iPS cells had been converted to a naive-like state, they readily differentiated into mature oligodendrocytes developing characteristic ramified branches, which could not be attained even with ES cells. These results suggest that the naive-like conversion of iPS cells might endow them with a higher differentiation capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell Culture; Embryonic Stem Cell; Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cell; Naive; Neurodifferentiation; Oligodendrocytes; Primed; Rabbit

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880763      PMCID: PMC3764818          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.502492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  56 in total

1.  Normal timing of oligodendrocyte development from genetically engineered, lineage-selectable mouse ES cells.

Authors:  Nathalie Billon; Christine Jolicoeur; Qi Long Ying; Austin Smith; Martin Raff
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Comparison of efficiency of terminal differentiation of oligodendrocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells versus embryonic stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Yasuhito Tokumoto; Shinichiro Ogawa; Teruyuki Nagamune; Jun Miyake
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Dissecting signaling pathways that govern self-renewal of rabbit embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Shufen Wang; Yi Shen; Xiaohua Yuan; Kai Chen; Xiangyu Guo; Yongchang Chen; Yuyu Niu; Jian Li; Ren-He Xu; Xiyun Yan; Qi Zhou; Weizhi Ji
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in rabbits: potential experimental models for human regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Arata Honda; Michiko Hirose; Masanori Hatori; Shogo Matoba; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Kimiko Inoue; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Robust enhancement of neural differentiation from human ES and iPS cells regardless of their innate difference in differentiation propensity.

Authors:  Dae-Sung Kim; Jae Souk Lee; Joong Woo Leem; Yong Jun Huh; Ji Young Kim; Han-Soo Kim; In-Hyun Park; George Q Daley; Dong-Youn Hwang; Dong-Wook Kim
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Generation of chimeric rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Masahito Tachibana; Michelle Sparman; Cathy Ramsey; Hong Ma; Hyo-Sang Lee; Maria Cecilia T Penedo; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines.

Authors:  Kyoko Miura; Yohei Okada; Takashi Aoi; Aki Okada; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Keisuke Okita; Masato Nakagawa; Michiyo Koyanagi; Koji Tanabe; Mari Ohnuki; Daisuke Ogawa; Eiji Ikeda; Hideyuki Okano; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Stable embryonic stem cell lines in rabbits: potential small animal models for human research.

Authors:  Arata Honda; Michiko Hirose; Kimiko Inoue; Narumi Ogonuki; Hiromi Miki; Nobuhiro Shimozawa; Masanori Hatori; Natsumi Shimizu; Takehide Murata; Megumi Hirose; Kazufumi Katayama; Noriko Wakisaka; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Kazunari K Yokoyama; Tadashi Sankai; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Basic FGF and Activin/Nodal but not LIF signaling sustain undifferentiated status of rabbit embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Arata Honda; Michiko Hirose; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jian Yang; Hui Liu; Dong Lu; Xiongfeng Chen; Zenon Zenonos; Lia S Campos; Roland Rad; Ge Guo; Shujun Zhang; Allan Bradley; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  24 in total

1.  Induction of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Somatic Alk1 Gene Mutations in Adult Mice.

Authors:  Wan Zhu; Daniel Saw; Miriam Weiss; Zhengda Sun; Meng Wei; Sonali Shaligram; Sen Wang; Hua Su
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.829

2.  Mouse Bone Marrow VSELs Exhibit Differentiation into Three Embryonic Germ Lineages and Germ & Hematopoietic Cells in Culture.

Authors:  Ambreen Shaikh; Sandhya Anand; Sona Kapoor; Ranita Ganguly; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  bFGF and Activin A function to promote survival and proliferation of single iPS cells in conditioned half-exchange mTeSR1 medium.

Authors:  Xiaoling Guo; Ruiling Lian; Yonglong Guo; Qing Liu; Qingshan Ji; Jiansu Chen
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 4.  Capturing Human Naïve Pluripotency in the Embryo and in the Dish.

Authors:  Ludovic Zimmerlin; Tea Soon Park; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Cancer-like epigenetic derangements of human pluripotent stem cells and their impact on applications in regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Huo; Stephen B Baylin; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  New insights into the epitranscriptomic control of pluripotent stem cell fate.

Authors:  Young Hyun Che; Hojae Lee; Yong Jun Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 12.153

7.  Derivation of Rabbit Embryonic Stem Cells from Vitrified-Thawed Embryos.

Authors:  Fuliang Du; Chien-Hong Chen; Yi Li; Yeshu Hu; Li-You An; Lan Yang; Jifeng Zhang; Y Eugene Chen; Jie Xu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 8.  Running the full human developmental clock in interspecies chimeras using alternative human stem cells with expanded embryonic potential.

Authors:  Justin Thomas; Ludovic Zimmerlin; Jeffrey S Huo; Michael Considine; Leslie Cope; Elias T Zambidis
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Naïve-like conversion enhances the difference in innate in vitro differentiation capacity between rabbit ES cells and iPS cells.

Authors:  Kimiko Honsho; Michiko Hirose; Masanori Hatori; Lubna Yasmin; Haruna Izu; Shogo Matoba; Sumie Togayachi; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Tadashi Sankai; Atsuo Ogura; Arata Honda
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 10.  Reprogramming and transdifferentiation for cardiovascular development and regenerative medicine: where do we stand?

Authors:  Antje D Ebert; Sebastian Diecke; Ian Y Chen; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.