Literature DB >> 23880355

Dietary intake of carbohydrates and risk of type 2 diabetes: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk study.

Sara Ahmadi-Abhari1, Robert N Luben1, Natasha Powell1, Amit Bhaniani1, Rajiv Chowdhury1, Nicholas J Wareham2, Nita G Forouhi2, Kay-Tee Khaw1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the association between dietary intake of carbohydrates and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Incident cases of diabetes (n 749) were identified and compared with a randomly selected subcohort of 3496 participants aged 40-79 years. For dietary assessment, we used 7 d food diaries administered at baseline. We carried out modified Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and compared results obtained from the different methods of adjustment for total energy intake. Dietary intakes of total carbohydrates, starch, sucrose, lactose or maltose were not significantly related to diabetes risk after adjustment for confounders. However, in the residual method for energy adjustment, intakes of fructose and glucose were inversely related to diabetes risk. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of diabetes comparing the extreme quintiles of intake were 0·79 (95 % CI 0·59, 1·07; P for trend = 0·03) for glucose and 0·62 (95 % CI 0·46, 0·83; P for trend = 0·01) for fructose. In the nutrient density method, only fructose was inversely related to diabetes risk (HR 0·65, 95 % CI 0·48, 0·88). The replacement of 5 % energy intake from SFA with an isoenergetic amount of fructose was associated with a 30 % lower diabetes risk (HR 0·69, 95 % CI 0·50, 0·96). Results of the standard and energy partition methods were similar to those of the residual method. These prospective findings suggest that the intakes of starch and sucrose are not associated, but that those of fructose and glucose are inversely associated with diabetes risk. Whether the inverse associations with fructose and glucose reflect the effect of substitution of these carbohydrate subtypes with other nutrients (i.e. SFA), their net higher intake or other nutrients associated with their intake remains to be established through further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880355     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513002298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  18 in total

Review 1.  Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019.

Authors:  Eiichi Araki; Atsushi Goto; Tatsuya Kondo; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hiroshi Noto; Hideki Origasa; Haruhiko Osawa; Akihiko Taguchi; Yukio Tanizawa; Kazuyuki Tobe; Narihito Yoshioka
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-07-24

Review 2.  Milk, dairy products, and their functional effects in humans: a narrative review of recent evidence.

Authors:  Francesco Visioli; Andrea Strata
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Christine S Tsilas; Russell J de Souza; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Arash Mirrahimi; Adrian I Cozma; Viranda H Jayalath; Vanessa Ha; Reem Tawfik; Marco Di Buono; Alexandra L Jenkins; Lawrence A Leiter; Thomas M S Wolever; Joseph Beyene; Tauseef Khan; Cyril W C Kendall; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan de Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexander Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Roger Adan; Pauline Emmett; Carlo Galli; Mathilde Kersting; Paula Moynihan; Luc Tappy; Laura Ciccolallo; Agnès de Sesmaisons-Lecarré; Lucia Fabiani; Zsuzsanna Horvath; Laura Martino; Irene Muñoz Guajardo; Silvia Valtueña Martínez; Marco Vinceti
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019.

Authors:  Eiichi Araki; Atsushi Goto; Tatsuya Kondo; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hiroshi Noto; Hideki Origasa; Haruhiko Osawa; Akihiko Taguchi; Yukio Tanizawa; Kazuyuki Tobe; Narihito Yoshioka
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.232

6.  Association between per capita sugar consumption and diabetes prevalence mediated by the body mass index: results of a global mediation analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Lang; Oliver Kuss; Tim Filla; Sabrina Schlesinger
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Adjustment for energy intake in nutritional research: a causal inference perspective.

Authors:  Georgia D Tomova; Kellyn F Arnold; Mark S Gilthorpe; Peter W G Tennant
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 8.  The role of dietary sugars and de novo lipogenesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  J Bernadette Moore; Pippa J Gunn; Barbara A Fielding
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Associations of Biomarker-Calibrated Intake of Total Sugars With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Natasha Tasevska; Mary Pettinger; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Lesley F Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Marian L Neuhouser; Jeannette M Beasley; Linda Van Horn; Barbara V Howard; Simin Liu; JoAnn E Manson; James M Shikany; Cynthia A Thomson; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis: a systematic review and evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Michelle D Althuis; Douglas L Weed; Cara L Frankenfeld
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.