Literature DB >> 23877342

A realistic model under which the genetic code is optimal.

Harry Buhrman1, Peter T S van der Gulik, Gunnar W Klau, Christian Schaffner, Dave Speijer, Leen Stougie.   

Abstract

The genetic code has a high level of error robustness. Using values of hydrophobicity scales as a proxy for amino acid character, and the mean square measure as a function quantifying error robustness, a value can be obtained for a genetic code which reflects the error robustness of that code. By comparing this value with a distribution of values belonging to codes generated by random permutations of amino acid assignments, the level of error robustness of a genetic code can be quantified. We present a calculation in which the standard genetic code is shown to be optimal. We obtain this result by (1) using recently updated values of polar requirement as input; (2) fixing seven assignments (Ile, Trp, His, Phe, Tyr, Arg, and Leu) based on aptamer considerations; and (3) using known biosynthetic relations of the 20 amino acids. This last point is reflected in an approach of subdivision (restricting the random reallocation of assignments to amino acid subgroups, the set of 20 being divided in four such subgroups). The three approaches to explain robustness of the code (specific selection for robustness, amino acid-RNA interactions leading to assignments, or a slow growth process of assignment patterns) are reexamined in light of our findings. We offer a comprehensive hypothesis, stressing the importance of biosynthetic relations, with the code evolving from an early stage with just glycine and alanine, via intermediate stages, towards 64 codons carrying todays meaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877342     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-013-9571-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  68 in total

Review 1.  The case for an error minimizing standard genetic code.

Authors:  Stephen J Freeland; Tao Wu; Nick Keulmann
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  The first peptides: the evolutionary transition between prebiotic amino acids and early proteins.

Authors:  Peter van der Gulik; Serge Massar; Dimitri Gilis; Harry Buhrman; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Deciphering synonymous codons in the three domains of life: co-evolution with specific tRNA modification enzymes.

Authors:  Henri Grosjean; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Christian Marck
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  AAindex: Amino Acid Index Database.

Authors:  S Kawashima; H Ogata; M Kanehisa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Did evolution select a nonrandom "alphabet" of amino acids?

Authors:  Gayle K Philip; Stephen J Freeland
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function.

Authors:  R A Jensen
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Simple, recurring RNA binding sites for L-arginine.

Authors:  Teresa Janas; Jeremy Joseph Widmann; Rob Knight; Michael Yarus
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Small Molecule Subgraph Detector (SMSD) toolkit.

Authors:  Syed Asad Rahman; Matthew Bashton; Gemma L Holliday; Rainer Schrader; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  A four-column theory for the origin of the genetic code: tracing the evolutionary pathways that gave rise to an optimized code.

Authors:  Paul G Higgs
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  An extension of the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code.

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.540

View more
  6 in total

1.  The origin of the genetic code: matter of metabolism or physicochemical determinism?

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Overcoming Challenges in Engineering the Genetic Code.

Authors:  M J Lajoie; D Söll; G M Church
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Genetic code evolution reveals the neutral emergence of mutational robustness, and information as an evolutionary constraint.

Authors:  Steven E Massey
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-24

4.  Evolution of the Standard Genetic Code.

Authors:  Michael Yarus
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  An integrated, structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code.

Authors:  Henri Grosjean; Eric Westhof
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  On Nature's Strategy for Assigning Genetic Code Multiplicity.

Authors:  Simone Gardini; Sara Cheli; Silvia Baroni; Gabriele Di Lascio; Guido Mangiavacchi; Nicholas Micheletti; Carmen Luigia Monaco; Lorenzo Savini; Davide Alocci; Stefano Mangani; Neri Niccolai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.