| Literature DB >> 23874584 |
Christophe Fraisier1, Luc Camoin, Stephanie M Lim, Stéphanie Lim, Mahfoud Bakli, Maya Belghazi, Patrick Fourquet, Samuel Granjeaud, Ab D M E Osterhaus, Penelope Koraka, Byron Martina, Lionel Almeras.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent West Nile virus (WNV) outbreaks in developed countries, including Europe and the United States, have been associated with significantly higher neuropathology incidence and mortality rate than previously documented. The changing epidemiology, the constant risk of (re-)emergence of more virulent WNV strains, and the lack of effective human antiviral therapy or vaccines makes understanding the pathogenesis of severe disease a priority. Thus, to gain insight into the pathophysiological processes in severe WNV infection, a kinetic analysis of protein expression profiles in the brain of WNV-infected mice was conducted using samples prior to and after the onset of clinical symptoms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23874584 PMCID: PMC3707916 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Detection of WNV in brains of mice infected with WNV-NY99.
(A) The amount of WNV positive-sense RNA copies present in the brains of mice between days 3 and 6 post-infection with WNV-NY99. Mice were euthanized on day 3, 4, 5 and 6 post-infection and brains were collected and homogenized in DMEM for RNA isolation. (B) The amount of positive-sense RNA copies present in the brains of control mice and mice inoculated on days 3 and 5 post-infection. Brains were collected in RNA-later for RNA isolation using Trizol. Histopathology of the brains of 9-day old C57BL/6 mice infected with WNV-NY99. (C) Infected neurons in the brain of a mouse euthanized on day 3 p.i. (objective 20x). (D) Infected neurons in the cortex of a mouse euthanized on day 5 p.i. (objective 20x). Pictures are representative of the number of infected cells found in the brain for the majority of mice.
Figure 22D-DIGE analysis (pH 3–10) of mock-, early and late WNV-infected brain samples.
(A) Representative data from a 2D-DIGE experiment using a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel with the pH range from 3 to 10 are shown. Proteins from mock- and late WNV-infected brain samples were labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 cyanine dyes, respectively. As determined by Progenesis SameSpot software, protein spots that were differentially regulated between the three experimental conditions (|ratio| ≥1.3 and p≤0.05), were submitted to mass spectrometry for identification. The numbers annotated on the gel correspond to master gel numbers of differentially regulated protein spots. Spots identified as Mus musculus (numbers#) and WNV (numbers*) proteins are listed in Table 1. Spots identified as a mixture of both species are indicated by numbers#*. Spots that were differentially modified between WNV-early and mock (B), WNV-late and WNV-early (C) and WNV-late and mock (D) infected samples are represented by red (up-regulated) or blue (down-regulated) dots.
Proteins identified from the differential 2D DIGE analysis (pH 3–10) after WNV infection.
| Accession number (SwissProt) | Protein name | Molecular weight (kDa) |
| Spot ID | Number of MS/MS peptide sequences | Sequence coverage (%) | Mascot score | Average volume ratio | Anova ( | ||
| WNV-E vs. mock | WNV-L vs. mock | WNV-L vs. WNV-E | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| POLG_KUNJM | Genome polyprotein [Kunjin virus] | 384.717 | 8.70 | 577 | 11 | 3.1 | 324 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 2.7e-8 | |
| 601 | 8 | 2.7 | 333 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 5.4e-5 | |||||
| 602 | 6 | 2.0 | 200 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 6.9e-6 | |||||
| 604 | 6 | 2.0 | 231 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 1.6e-6 | |||||
| POLG_WNV | Genome polyprotein [West Nile virus] | 383.401 | 8.63 | 710 | 1 | 0.3 | 77 | 1.4 | 0.003 | ||
| 779 | 1 | 0.3 | 98 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 4.3e-11 | |||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Metabolic/biosynthertic process | |||||||||||
| ACLY_MOUSE | ATP-citrate synthase [Mus musculus] | 120.564 | 7.13 | 325 | 9 | 10.0 | 231 | −1.4 | 0.005 | ||
| BACH_MOUSE | Cytosolic acyl coenzyme A thioester hydrolase [Mus musculus] | 42.966 | 8.90 | 903 | 3 | 8.7 | 70 | −1.3 | 8.7e-7 | ||
| CAH2_MOUSE | Carbonic anhydrase 2 [Mus musculus] | 29.129 | 6.49 | 1065 | 1 | 3.5 | 35 | 1.3 | 0.003 | ||
| CATA_MOUSE | Catalase [Mus musculus] | 60.403 | 7.72 | 701 | 8 | 16.9 | 205 | −1.3 | −1.3 | 1.5e-6 | |
| GPDM_MOUSE | Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial [Mus musculus] | 81.416 | 6.17 | 1032 | 2 | 4.5 | 100 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.004 | |
| SYG_MOUSE | Glycyl-tRNA synthetase [Mus musculus] | 82.624 | 6.24 | 560 | 5 | 6.4 | 105 | −1.3 | −1.3 | 2.1e-5 | |
| Host response/protein folding | |||||||||||
| ALBU_MOUSE | Serum albumin [Mus musculus] | 70.700 | 5.75 | 578 | 22 | 35.0 | 1468 | −1.4 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.7e-7 |
| 580 | 14 | 25.8 | 1535 | −1.3 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 5.5e-7 | ||||
| 585 | 12 | 20.2 | 190 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 7.0e-6 | |||||
| 587 | 1 | 2.1 | 69 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 5.1e-7 | |||||
| 606 | 2 | 3.0 | 38 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.0e-6 | |||||
| 609 | 1 | 2.5 | 116 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.8e-7 | |||||
| HS12A_MOUSE | Heat shock 70 kDa protein 12A [Mus musculus] | 75.167 | 6.32 | 558 | 4 | 7.6 | 103 | −1.4 | −1.4 | 4.1e-5 | |
| HSP7C_MOUSE | Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein [Mus musculus] | 71.055 | 5.37 | 578 | 10 | 19.0 | 231 | −1.4 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.7e-7 |
| 580 | 3 | 6.8 | 120 | −1.3 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 5.5e-7 | ||||
| 585 | 11 | 21.1 | 273 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 7.0e-6 | |||||
| 587 | 1 | 2.3 | 40 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 5.1e-7 | |||||
| 609 | 1 | 1.9 | 76 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.8e-7 | |||||
| PRDX6_MOUSE | Peroxiredoxin-6 [Mus musculus] | 24.969 | 5.71 | 1102 | 6 | 30.4 | 106 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.001 | |
| TCPA_MOUSE | T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha [Mus musculus] | 60.867 | 5.82 | 657 | 4 | 8.1 | 187 | −1.3 | −1.3 | 0.024 | |
| TCPG_MOUSE | T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma [Mus musculus] | 61.162 | 6.28 | 476 | 6 | 20.2 | 164 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 6.8e-5 | |
| Transcription/translation regulation | |||||||||||
| EF2_MOUSE | Elongation factor 2 [Mus musculus] | 96.222 | 6.41 | 380 | 21 | 25.3 | 609 | −1.3 | 0.006 | ||
| FUBP2_MOUSE | Far upstream element-binding protein 2 [Mus musculus] | 77.184 | 6.90 | 505 | 9 | 15.0 | 191 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.2e-5 | |
| SFPQ_MOUSE | Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich [Mus musculus] | 75.508 | 9.45 | 386 | 3 | 3.4 | 46 | −2.0 | −1.6 | 1.2e-4 | |
| Cytoskeleton maintenanvce | |||||||||||
| ACTB_MOUSE | Actin, cytoplasmic 1 [Mus musculus] | 42.052 | 5.29 | 876 | 3 | 7.7 | 48 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.9e-8 |
| 882 | 8 | 25.9 | 241 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.1e-4 | |||||
| 1056 | 3 | 7.7 | 58 | 1.4 | 9.1e-4 | ||||||
| DYN1_MOUSE | Dynamin-1 [Mus musculus] | 98.140 | 7.61 | 475 | 9 | 13.0 | 170 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 3.6e-5 |
| 476 | 5 | 15.6 | 163 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 6.8e-5 | |||||
| TBB5_MOUSE | Tubulin beta-5 chain [Mus musculus] | 50.095 | 4.78 | 710 | 6 | 15.0 | 225 | 1.4 | 0.003 | ||
| Nervous system developement | |||||||||||
| DPYL2_MOUSE | Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 [Mus musculus] | 62.638 | 5.95 | 558 | 9 | 20.1 | 510 | −1.4 | −1.4 | 4.1e-5 | |
| 560 | 9 | 20.1 | 298 | −1.3 | −1.3 | 2.1e-5 | |||||
| 625 | 12 | 26.7 | 739 | −1.3 | 2.0e-6 | ||||||
| DPYL3_MOUSE | Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 3 [Mus musculus] | 62.296 | 6.04 | 657 | 13 | 29.1 | 989 | −1.3 | −1.3 | 0.024 | |
| GFAP_MOUSE | Glial fibrillary acidic protein [Mus musculus] | 49.927 | 5.27 | 792 | 16 | 34.5 | 385 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 2.2e-5 | |
| Transport | |||||||||||
| TRFE_MOUSE | Serotransferrin [Mus musculus] | 78.841 | 6.94 | 497 | 12 | 17.9 | 467 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.5e-7 | |
| 499 | 16 | 25.4 | 616 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 5.4e-7 | |||||
| 502 | 12 | 22.8 | 428 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 4.5e-6 | |||||
| VATB2_MOUSE | V-type proton ATPase subunit B, brain isoform [Mus musculus] | 56.857 | 5.57 | 710 | 2 | 4.1 | 70 | 1.4 | 0.003 | ||
| Not identified | |||||||||||
|
| 350 | −1.4 | −1.3 | 8.9e-5 | |||||||
|
| 481 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.1e-9 | ||||||
|
| 1132 | 1.3 | 0.002 | ||||||||
The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry following in-gel trypsin digestion. The spot numbers correspond to the same numbers as indicated on Figure 2. The identities of the spots, their SwissProt accession numbers, and the theoretical molecular masses and pI values as well as the number of peptide sequences, the corresponding percent sequence coverage, and the Mascot score are listed for MS/MS analysis. Protein scores greater than 34 were considered as significant (p<0.05). Paired average volume ratio and p values (ANOVA) between the three experimental groups were defined using Progenesis Samespot software. Missing data correspond to paired average volume ratio not significantly changes. n.i., no identification.
Figure 3Classification of proteins significantly differentially regulated following WNV infection identified by 2D-DIGE and iTRAQ analysis.
Venn diagram representing unique host proteins identified according to experimental group comparisons following WNV-infection by 2D-DIGE (A) and iTRAQ (B) analysis. The number of host proteins significantly differentially regulated between WNV-E and mock, WNV-L and mock or WNV-L and WNV-E are indicated. The two samples that were compared are indicated adjacent to each circle. The number and the percentage of proteins associated with each category are indicated in brackets. Classification of the significantly differentially regulated proteins according to their sub-cellular location (C) and their functional categorization (D) according to gene ontology. The percentages of proteins associated with each category are indicated in brackets. (E) Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed according to the (mean) ratios calculated between WNV-E and mock, WNV-L and mock or WNV-L and WNV-E, as indicated at the top of the graphic. Up- and down-regulated proteins are shown in red and green, respectively, and proteins with no change in expression level are indicated in black. The intensity of red or green color corresponds to the degree of regulation as indicated by the color strip at the bottom of the figure in arbitrary units. The graphical cluster was generated using the Genesis program [130].
Top three IPA-generated networks of differentially expressed molecules identified by DIGE and iTRAQ labeling between early and mock, late and mock, and late and early WNV-infected brain samples.
| Top Functions | Score | Focus Molecules | Molecules in Network |
|
| |||
| Protein Synthesis, Cell Death, Cancer | 49 | 23 |
|
| Nervous System Development and Function, Organ Morphology, Cell Morphology | 48 | 22 |
|
| Molecular Transport, Small Molecule Biochemistry, Cell Cycle | 43 | 21 |
|
|
| |||
| Cellular Assembly and Organization, Nervous System Development and Function, Cell Death | 48 | 22 |
|
| Cell Death, Developmental Disorder, Neurological Disease | 42 | 21 |
|
| Molecular Transport, Cellular Function and Maintenance, Nucleic Acid Metabolism | 38 | 19 |
|
|
| |||
| Cell Morphology, Cellular Assembly and Organization, Cellular Function and Maintenance | 40 | 19 |
|
| Organismal Injury and Abnormalities, Respiratory Disease, Hematological Disease | 38 | 18 |
|
| Infectious Disease, Endocrine System Development and Function, Energy Production | 35 | 16 |
|
Figure 4Western blot validations of differentially regulated proteins identified by 2D-DIGE and/or iTRAQ analyses.
(A) Protein samples from each group used for proteomic analysis were minimally labeled with cyanine-3 dye. At the top, a representative protein profile of three biological replicates from brain lysates of mock-, and WNV early- and late-infected mice, separated by 10% SDS-PAGE is shown. WB with fluorescence-based methods was used to detect an overlaid fluorescent scan of the general protein patterns (Cy3 dye (green)) and the specific immunoreactive proteins (FITC or Cy5 dye (red)). To better visualize protein detection signals observed with each specific antibody used, corresponding cropped WB images are presented in grey levels. (B) The graphs correspond to the mean ± S.D. of protein quantity measured by densitometry of the antigenic bands. Densitometry analyses were performed using TotalLab Quant v12.2 software (Nonlinear Dynamics), and data were normalized to levels of global protein pattern intensity. The values indicated under each graph correspond to fold changes from paired comparisons (i.e., WNV-E/mock, WNV-L/mock, WNV-L/WNV-E). WNV-E/−L, biological replicates of brain samples infected by West Nile Virus and collected at early or late time-points. The significance of the differential protein expression are indicated *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. A.U., arbitrary units. α-, antibody anti-; ★, IFN-γ activated mice bone marrow derived macrophage (p-701-STAT1 positive control); #, no quantification for p-701-STAT1. CAPN9, calpain 9; CLTC, clathrin heavy chain; DNM1, dynamin 1; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; HUWE1; E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase; MAP1B, microtubule-associated protein 1B; MAP2, microtubule-associated protein 2; PRDX6, peroxiredoxin 6; STAT1/2, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/2; VIM, vimentin.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of key pathways or biological functions altered during the course of WNV infection.
Host proteins that were found to be significantly differentially regulated by proteomic approaches were located in relevant pathways based on the IPA database results and a careful reading of published literature. The proteins that were determined to be differentially regulated in our study are indicated in the right portion of each panel, according to the different time-point comparisons. Several functions were altered during the course of WNV-infection in the mice brain, including: (A) The cytoskeleton remodeling associated with virus circulation as evidenced by the WNV hijacking of the clathrin-mediated endocytosis pathway (CME) and Rho GTPase signaling. (B) The perturbations of the protein ubiquitination pathway allowing viral proteins to avoid degradation and/or antigen presentation. (C) The regulation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway corresponding to an evasion mechanism against activation of the antiviral response. (D) The kinetic modulation of the inflammatory response leading to brain injuries. (E) Cell death comprising neuronal necrosis and apoptotic phenomena. (F) The brain damage reflected by the abundance variation of numerous proteins involved in the deterioration of neurological functions. Known partners of identified differentially regulated molecules are indicated. Anti-viral strategies and potential biomarker candidates associated with the severity of clinical evolution are suggested as indicated in green and blue, respectively. A legend is shown in the bottom left corner. Abbreviations of IPA-uploaded proteins are listed in Tables 1, S4 and S5. The others are listed as follows: Bax, Bcl2-associated X protein; BBB, blood-brain barrier; Bcl2, B-cell lymphoma 2; Casp.3, Caspase 3; Cdc42, cell division cycle 42; E1 and E2, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme; E3, ubiquitin protein ligase; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; IRF9, interferon regulatory factor 9; ISG, interferon-stimulated gene; ISGF3, IFN stimulated gene factor 3; ISRE, interferon-stimulated response element; JAK1, Janus kinase 1; NS-V, non-structural viral protein; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; TYK2, tyrosine kinase 2; Ub, ubiquitin.