Keith B Neeves1, Abimbola A Onasoga, Adam R Wufsus. 1. Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado 80401, USA. kneeves@mines.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the application of microfluidic technologies in hemostasis. The emphasis is on promising developments in devices for clinical applications and novel approaches to modeling complex hemodynamics. RECENT FINDINGS: Microfluidics combined with micropatterning of prothrombotic substrates provides devices for measuring platelet function and coagulation with low blood volumes (∼100 μl) over a wide range of shear stresses. This technology has been applied to the diagnosis of bleeding and thrombotic disorders, as well as to dosing and monitoring of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Microfluidic devices that mimic vascular geometries such as bifurcations, stenosis, and complex interconnected networks yield complex flow fields that have revealed new mechanisms of platelet adhesion and aggregation. Applying techniques from tissue engineering by endothelializing these networks is beginning to close the gap between in-vitro and in-vivo models of vascular injury. SUMMARY: Microfluidic technology enables researchers to create in-vitro models of vascular disease with unprecedented control of the biochemical and biophysical conditions. Two promising directions are flow-dependent clinical assays and biomimetic vascular networks. These approaches are particularly well suited for modeling the microvasculature. However, caution should be used when extrapolating results from microfluidic channels to the pathophysiology of thrombosis in large arteries and veins.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the application of microfluidic technologies in hemostasis. The emphasis is on promising developments in devices for clinical applications and novel approaches to modeling complex hemodynamics. RECENT FINDINGS: Microfluidics combined with micropatterning of prothrombotic substrates provides devices for measuring platelet function and coagulation with low blood volumes (∼100 μl) over a wide range of shear stresses. This technology has been applied to the diagnosis of bleeding and thrombotic disorders, as well as to dosing and monitoring of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Microfluidic devices that mimic vascular geometries such as bifurcations, stenosis, and complex interconnected networks yield complex flow fields that have revealed new mechanisms of platelet adhesion and aggregation. Applying techniques from tissue engineering by endothelializing these networks is beginning to close the gap between in-vitro and in-vivo models of vascular injury. SUMMARY: Microfluidic technology enables researchers to create in-vitro models of vascular disease with unprecedented control of the biochemical and biophysical conditions. Two promising directions are flow-dependent clinical assays and biomimetic vascular networks. These approaches are particularly well suited for modeling the microvasculature. However, caution should be used when extrapolating results from microfluidic channels to the pathophysiology of thrombosis in large arteries and veins.
Authors: Judith M E M Cosemans; Saskia E M Schols; Lucia Stefanini; Susanne de Witt; Marion A H Feijge; Karly Hamulyák; Hans Deckmyn; Wolfgang Bergmeier; Johan W M Heemskerk Journal: Blood Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Matthew K Runyon; Christian J Kastrup; Bethany L Johnson-Kerner; Thuong G Van Ha; Rustem F Ismagilov Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: M Roest; J J Sixma; Y P Wu; M J Ijsseldijk; M Tempelman; P J Slootweg; P G de Groot; G H van Zanten Journal: Blood Date: 2000-08-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Edgar Gutierrez; Brian G Petrich; Sanford J Shattil; Mark H Ginsberg; Alex Groisman; Ana Kasirer-Friede Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: T C White; M A Berny; E I Tucker; R T Urbanus; P G de Groot; J A Fernández; J H Griffin; A Gruber; O J T McCarty Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Jonathan N Thon; Linas Mazutis; Stephen Wu; Joanna L Sylman; Allen Ehrlicher; Kellie R Machlus; Qiang Feng; Shijiang Lu; Robert Lanza; Keith B Neeves; David A Weitz; Joseph E Italiano Journal: Blood Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R M Schoeman; K Rana; N Danes; M Lehmann; J A Di Paola; A L Fogelson; K Leiderman; K B Neeves Journal: Cell Mol Bioeng Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 2.321
Authors: Bomy Lee Chung; Michael J Toth; Nazila Kamaly; Yoshitaka J Sei; Jacob Becraft; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad; Omid C Farokhzad; YongTae Kim; Robert Langer Journal: Nano Today Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 20.722