Literature DB >> 23871769

The role of MGMT testing in clinical practice: a report of the association for molecular pathology.

Milena Cankovic1, Marina N Nikiforova, Matija Snuderl, Adekunle M Adesina, Neal Lindeman, Patrick Y Wen, Eudocia Q Lee.   

Abstract

Recent advances in modern molecular technologies allow for the examination and measurement of cancer-related genomic changes. The number of molecular tests for evaluation of diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive markers is expected to increase. In recent years, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been firmly established as a biomarker in patients diagnosed with gliomas, for both clinical trials and routine clinical management. Similarly, molecular markers, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for 1p/19q have already demonstrated clinical utility in treatment of oligodendroglial tumors, and others might soon show clinical utility. Furthermore, nonrandom associations are being discovered among MGMT, 1p/19q LOH, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, and other tumor-specific modifications that could possibly enhance our ability to predict outcome and response to therapy. While pathologists are facing new and more complicated requests for clinical genomic testing, clinicians are challenged with increasing numbers of molecular data coming from molecular pathology and genomic medicine. Both pathologists and oncologists need to understand the clinical utility of molecular tests and test results, including issues of turnaround time, and their impact on the application of targeted treatment regimens. This review summarizes the existing data that support the rationale for MGMT promoter methylation testing and possibly other molecular testing in clinically defined glioma subtypes. Various molecular testing platforms for evaluation of MGMT methylation status are also discussed.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871769     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  21 in total

1.  The methylation of a panel of genes differentiates low-grade from high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Aleksandra Majchrzak-Celińska; Jarosław Paluszczak; Marlena Szalata; Anna-Maria Barciszewska; Stanisław Nowak; Robert Kleszcz; Adam Sherba; Wanda Baer-Dubowska
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-08

Review 2.  MGMT testing allows for personalised therapy in the temozolomide era.

Authors:  A Dullea; L Marignol
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-30

3.  Pyrosequencing Analysis of MGMT Promoter Methylation in Meningioma.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Henning Leske; Pitt Niehusmann; Lene E Johannessen; Julie Staurseth; Nina Øino; Torstein R Meling; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci; Petter Brandal
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

5.  Identification of MGMT promoter methylation sites correlating with gene expression and IDH1 mutation in gliomas.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Jian-Hui Yang; Jia Quan; Xing Kang; Hui-Juan Wang; Peng-Gao Dai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Localization of specialized intestinal metaplasia and the molecular alterations in Barrett esophagus in a Japanese population: an analysis of biopsy samples based on the "Seattle" biopsy protocol.

Authors:  Shota Fukui; Jiro Watari; Toshihiko Tomita; Takahisa Yamasaki; Takuya Okugawa; Takashi Kondo; Tomoaki Kono; Katsuyuki Tozawa; Hisatomo Ikehara; Yoshio Ohda; Tadayuki Oshima; Hirokazu Fukui; Kiron M Das; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  MGMT promoter methylation and correlation with protein expression in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Authors:  L Toffolatti; E Scquizzato; S Cavallin; F Canal; M Scarpa; P M Stefani; F Gherlinzoni; A P Dei Tos
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges.

Authors:  Alireza Mansouri; Laureen D Hachem; Sheila Mansouri; Farshad Nassiri; Normand J Laperriere; Daniel Xia; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Arnab Chakravarti; Minesh P Mehta; Monika E Hegi; Roger Stupp; Kenneth D Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  MRI-Based Deep-Learning Method for Determining Glioma MGMT Promoter Methylation Status.

Authors:  C G B Yogananda; B R Shah; S S Nalawade; G K Murugesan; F F Yu; M C Pinho; B C Wagner; B Mickey; T R Patel; B Fei; A J Madhuranthakam; J A Maldjian
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Correlation of commercially available quantitative MGMT (O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) promoter methylation scores and GBM patient survival.

Authors:  Laura Dovek; Nhung T Nguyen; Byram H Ozer; Ning Li; Robert M Elashoff; Richard M Green; Linda Liau; P Leia Nghiemphu; Timothy F Cloughesy; Albert Lai
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.