Literature DB >> 23871706

Treatment of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing based on magnetic resonance imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms.

Walter van der Weegen1, Thea Sijbesma1, Henk J Hoekstra1, Koen Brakel2, Peter Pilot3, Rob G H H Nelissen4.   

Abstract

Peri-prosthetic pseudotumor formation can be a severe complication following Metal-on-Metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA), with limited data on the optimal management of this complication. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the prevalence and severity of pseudotumors in a consecutive cohort of 248 MoMHRA (214 patients, mean follow-up 4.6 years, range: 1 - 8.2), and (2) to present a clinical guideline for their treatment based on severity grading with Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms. Pseudotumor prevalence was 36.3%: 61 mild, 25 moderate and four were graded severe. Five revisions followed, all in symptomatic patients with elevated metal ion levels. Pseudotumor severity grading allowed us to be conservative with revision surgery for mild and moderate MoM disease.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip resurfacing; metal-on-metal; pseudotumors; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871706     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

Review 1.  The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Heavy metal? Recognizing complications of metal on metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Denise M Millstine; Hannah J Hakes; Anita P Mayer; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; Brandon J Erickson; Michael D Hellman; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Christina Esposito; Parina Shah; Mauro Miranda; Elexis Baral; Kara Fields; Thomas Bauer; Douglas E Padgett; Timothy Wright; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Metal Head on a Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Liner.

Authors:  Min-Yook Kim; Young-Yool Chung; Ji-Hoon Park; Jung-Ho Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-12-30

6.  Ultrasound findings in asymptomatic patients with modular metal on metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicholas B Frisch; Nolan M Wessell; Kevin Taliaferro; Marnix Van Holsbeeck; Craig D Silverton
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  [Short hip stem for THA in avascular necrosis of the femoral head].

Authors:  F Thorey; T Floerkemeier; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 8.  Systemic and local toxicity of metal debris released from hip prostheses: A review of experimental approaches.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Abhijith Segu; Júlio C M Souza; XueJun Li; Mark Barba; Louis G Mercuri; Joshua J Jacobs; Mathew Thoppil Mathew
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Comparison of different pseudotumor grading systems in a single cohort of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  W van der Weegen; K Brakel; R J Horn; J A Wullems; H P Das; P Pilot; R G Nelissen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.