Literature DB >> 23870352

Impact of the spinal cord position uncertainty on the dose received during head and neck helical tomotherapy.

Tomasz Piotrowski1, Joanna Kaźmierska, Adam Sokołowski, Małgorzata Skórska, Agata Jodda, Adam Ryczkowski, Witold Cholewiński, Bartosz Bąk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to establish the optimal planning risk volume (PRV) to the spinal cord (SC) for oropharyngeal cancer patients during adaptive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.
METHODS: Geometrical uncertainties of the SC were evaluated. Differences between planned and delivered maximum doses to each part of the SC were established for every fraction dose and for cumulative dose. Maximum doses were evaluated as a dose received in 0.5 and 1 cm(3) of the analysed part of the SC defined as C1-C2, C3-C4, C5-C6 and C7-Th1 where Cn was a n-th cervical vertebra (n = 1, … , 7) and Th1 was the first thoracic vertebra. Finally, relations between dose differences and geometrical uncertainties were analysed using a relative risk (RR) and the importance of the PRV dose gradient to establish an optimal PRV for the SC.
RESULTS: Prospective study based on the 875 observations from 25 oropharyngeal cancer patients was performed. The C1-C2 part of the SC is most exposed to risk of overdosage during chemoradiation for patients with oropharyngeal cancer due to its proximity to the clinical target volume (CTV). Doses received by other parts of the SC are smaller, with the lowest dose delivered to C7-Th1. For the C1-C2, delivered dose was higher than planned dose by 11%, while for the C7-Th1, this difference was smaller than 7%. The lowest movement of individual parts of the SC were detected for the C1-C2 and the highest for the C7-Th1. The standard deviations of the mean shift ranged respectively from 0.9 to 1.4 mm and from 1.3 to 2.9 mm. For each part of the SC delivered dose was smaller than planned dose to the PRV (RR < 1).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that for chemoradiation of oropharyngeal cancer, using daily image guidance and proper plan adaptation scheme, the current PRV margin for the SC could be reduced to 4 mm.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology © 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H&N image guided radiation therapy; PRV margins; adaptive RT; helical tomotherapy; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870352     DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  10 in total

1.  Influence of the type of imaging on the delineation process during the treatment planning.

Authors:  Weronika Jackowiak; Bartosz Bąk; Anna Kowalik; Adam Ryczkowski; Małgorzata Skórska; Małgorzata Paszek-Widzińska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-18

Review 2.  Medical physics in radiotherapy: The importance of preserving clinical responsibilities and expanding the profession's role in research, education, and quality control.

Authors:  Julian Malicki
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  Comparison of dose distribution for head and neck cancer patients with and without dose painting escalation during radiotherapy realized with tomotherapy unit.

Authors:  Malgorzata Skorska; Tomasz Piotrowski; Adam Ryczkowski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Quantifying the dosimetric effects of neck contour changes and setup errors on the spinal cord in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: establishing a rapid estimation method.

Authors:  Yinghui Li; Zhanfu Wei; Zhibin Liu; Jianjian Teng; Yuanzhi Chang; Qiuying Xie; Liwen Zhang; Jinping Shi; Lixin Chen
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.438

Review 5.  Registration methods in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paweł Czajkowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Radiotherapy-Compatible Robotic System for Multi-Landmark Positioning in Head and Neck Cancer Treatments.

Authors:  Mark Ostyn; Siqiu Wang; Yun-Soung Kim; Siyong Kim; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prediction of Incomplete Response of Primary Tumour Based on Clinical and Radiomics Features in Inoperable Head and Neck Cancers after Definitive Treatment.

Authors:  Joanna Kaźmierska; Michał R Kaźmierski; Tomasz Bajon; Tomasz Winiecki; Anna Bandurska-Luque; Adam Ryczkowski; Tomasz Piotrowski; Bartosz Bąk; Małgorzata Żmijewska-Tomczak
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Assessment of tumour hypoxia, proliferation and glucose metabolism in head and neck cancer before and during treatment.

Authors:  Joanna Kazmierska; Witold Cholewinski; Tomasz Piotrowski; Anna Sowinska; Bartosz Bak; Paulina Cegła; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Impact of the Intra- and Inter-observer Variability in the Delineation of Parotid Glands on the Dose Calculation During Head and Neck Helical Tomotherapy.

Authors:  T Piotrowski; K Gintowt; A Jodda; A Ryczkowski; W Bandyk; B Ba K; M Adamczyk; M Skorska; J Kazmierska; J Malicki
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08

10.  Feasibility of a Skin Dose Reduction for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With High-Intensity-Modulated Delivery Techniques.

Authors:  Xiongfei Liao; Jie Li; Pei Wang; Xinghong Yao; Yulei Zhang; Tingqiang Tan; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.