Literature DB >> 25949219

Medical physics in radiotherapy: The importance of preserving clinical responsibilities and expanding the profession's role in research, education, and quality control.

Julian Malicki1.   

Abstract

Medical physicists have long had an integral role in radiotherapy. In recent decades, medical physicists have slowly but surely stepped back from direct clinical responsibilities in planning radiotherapy treatments while medical dosimetrists have assumed more responsibility. In this article, I argue against this gradual withdrawal from routine therapy planning. It is essential that physicists be involved, at least to some extent, in treatment planning and clinical dosimetry for each and every patient; otherwise, physicists can no longer be considered clinical specialists. More importantly, this withdrawal could negatively impact treatment quality and patient safety. Medical physicists must have a sound understanding of human anatomy and physiology in order to be competent partners to radiation oncologists. In addition, they must possess a thorough knowledge of the physics of radiation as it interacts with body tissues, and also understand the limitations of the algorithms used in radiotherapy. Medical physicists should also take the lead in evaluating emerging challenges in quality and safety of radiotherapy. In this sense, the input of physicists in clinical audits and risk assessment is crucial. The way forward is to proactively take the necessary steps to maintain and advance our important role in clinical medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Medical physics; Profession; Professional training

Year:  2015        PMID: 25949219      PMCID: PMC4418581          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  24 in total

1.  Competencies in radiation oncology: a new approach for education and training of professionals for Radiotherapy and Oncology in Europe.

Authors:  Richard Pötter; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Andy W Beavis; Mary Coffey; Christine Verfaillie; Jan Willem Leer; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  The "Bologna Process" in European higher education: impact of bachelor's and master's degrees on German medical education.

Authors:  Peter Hensen
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  The European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics. Policy Statement No. 12: The present status of Medical Physics Education and Training in Europe. New perspectives and EFOMP recommendations.

Authors:  Teresa Eudaldo; Kjeld Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Comparison of curricula in radiation technology in the field of radiotherapy in selected European Union countries.

Authors:  Agnieszka Janaszczyk; Marta Bogusz-Czerniewicz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-05-31

5.  Impact of the spinal cord position uncertainty on the dose received during head and neck helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Tomasz Piotrowski; Joanna Kaźmierska; Adam Sokołowski; Małgorzata Skórska; Agata Jodda; Adam Ryczkowski; Witold Cholewiński; Bartosz Bąk
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.735

Review 6.  The contribution, history, impact and future of physics in medicine.

Authors:  Steve Webb
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Radiotherapy capacity in Europe.

Authors:  Cai Grau; Josep M Borras; Julian Malicki; Ben Slotman; Peter Dunscombe; Mary Coffey; Donal Hollywood; Ferran Guedea; Chiara Gasparotto; Yolande Lievens
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  ESTRO 2012 strategy meeting: vision for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Vincenzo Valentini; Jean Bourhis; Donal Hollywood
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Performance of different radiotherapy workload models.

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Lynda D Jackson; Karleen Schulze; Patti A Groome; Farshad Foroudi; Geoff P Delaney; William J Mackillop
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Revised European core curriculum for RTs.

Authors:  Mary Coffey; Jan Degerfält; Andreas Osztavics; Judocus van Hedel; Guy Vandevelde
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Personalized radiotherapy treatment planning based on functional imaging.

Authors:  Malgorzata Skórska; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-05-15

2.  Integration of Gross Anatomy Laboratory Sessions into Medical Physics Curriculum.

Authors:  Esther ShinHyun Kang; Marija Popovic; Geoffroy Noel
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-10-14

3.  Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Automated Radiotherapy Planning: A Multisite Survey of Low- and Middle-Income Country Radiation Oncology Providers.

Authors:  Gwendolyn J McGinnis; Matthew S Ning; Beth M Beadle; Nanette Joubert; William Shaw; Christoph Trauernich; Hannah Simonds; Surbhi Grover; Carlos E Cardenas; Laurence E Court; Grace L Smith
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-05

4.  Single-cell whole-genome sequencing identifies human papillomavirus integration in cervical tumour cells prior to and following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Weiyuan Zhang; Yang Liu; Junqing Liang; Tongqing Zhang; Yunbo Bai; Wenjing Hao; Kexin Ma; Danni Lu; Jing Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Adapting training for medical physicists to match future trends in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Giovanna Gagliardi; Ben Heijmen; Julian Malicki; Daniela Thorwarth; Dirk Verellen; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.