| Literature DB >> 23870214 |
Xingfei Zheng1, Cheng Pan, Ying Diao, Yongning You, Chaozhu Yang, Zhongli Hu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amorphophallus is a genus of perennial plants widely distributed in the tropics or subtropics of West Africa and South Asia. Its corms contain a high level of water-soluble glucomannan; therefore, it has long been used as a medicinal herb and food source. Genetic studies of Amorphophallus have been hindered by a lack of genetic markers. A large number of molecular markers are required for genetic diversity study and improving disease resistance in Amorphophallus. Here, we report large scale of transcriptome sequencing of two species: Amorphophallus konjac and Amorphophallus bulbifer using deep sequencing technology, and microsatellite (SSR) markers were identified based on these transcriptome sequences.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23870214 PMCID: PMC3737116 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Transcriptome reads and assembled contig information for two species
| 54,986,020 | 4,948,741,800 | 92.27% | 56.93% | 187,459 | 51,822,856 | 381 | 276 | |
| 52,334,098 | 4,710,068,820 | 93.48% | 54.29% | 199,257 | 54,982,674 | 372 | 276 |
Figure 1Frequency distribution of the contig sizes from two species. The frequency distribution of contig sizes resulting from Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 sequencing, as analyzed using the Trinity software.
Summary of the unigenes from two species
| 108,651 | 47,721,327 | 439 | 534 | |
| 119,678 | 51,480,410 | 430 | 524 | |
| All | 135,822 | 71,092,160 | 523 | 635 |
Figure 2Size distribution of unigenes from two species. The frequency distribution of unigene sizes from A. konjac and A. bulbifer and the combined unigenes, as analyzed with the Trinity software.
Figure 3Frequency distribution of the EST-SSRs of different sizes. A: Unit size; B: Number of repeats; C: SSR loci length.
Frequency distribution of the 13 most frequent SSR repeat motifs in the transcriptome with different levels of repeats
| 1 | AG/CT | - | 2233 | 1797 | 1632 | 1808 | 1166 | 217 | 11 | 2 | 8866 | 45.2% |
| 2 | AT/AT | - | 518 | 320 | 252 | 206 | 195 | 72 | 10 | 1 | 1574 | 8.0% |
| 3 | AC/GT | - | 487 | 325 | 222 | 173 | 200 | 106 | 11 | | 1524 | 7.8% |
| 4 | AGG/CCT | 800 | 421 | 161 | 10 | | | | | 1 | 1393 | 7.1% |
| 5 | AAG/CTT | 638 | 358 | 177 | 22 | | | 1 | | 2 | 1198 | 6.1% |
| 6 | CCG/CGG | 674 | 261 | 102 | 6 | 2 | | | | | 1045 | 5.3% |
| 7 | AGC/CTG | 508 | 259 | 128 | 12 | | 1 | | | 1 | 909 | 4.6% |
| 8 | ACC/GGT | 261 | 128 | 59 | 11 | | | | | 1 | 460 | 2.3% |
| 9 | ATC/ATG | 157 | 86 | 60 | 13 | | | | | | 316 | 1.6% |
| 10 | ACG/CGT | 136 | 56 | 24 | 6 | | | | | 2 | 223 | 1.1% |
| 11 | AAT/ATT | 107 | 53 | 24 | 10 | | | 2 | | 3 | 199 | 1.0% |
| 12 | AAC/GTT | 79 | 29 | 15 | 9 | | | 1 | | 1 | 134 | 0.7% |
| 13 | CG/CG | - | 55 | 25 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 105 | 0.5% | ||
The 25 individual plants (belonging to 14 species and 5 unknown “species”) used for validation and the genetic diversity study
| 1 | Chengdu, Sichuan | Cultivar | |
| 2 | Fujian | Cultivar | |
| 3 | Enshi, Hubei | Wild | |
| 4 | Enshi, Hubei | Cultivar | |
| 5 | Zhangjiajie, Hunan | Wild | |
| 6 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 7 | Kunming, Yunnan | Cultivar | |
| 8 | Wuhan, Hubei | Cultivar | |
| 9 | Wuhan, Hubei | Wild | |
| 10 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 11 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 12 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 13 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 14 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 15 | Kunming, Yunnan | Cultivar | |
| 16 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 17 | Kunming, Yunnan | Cultivar | |
| 18 | Kunming, Yunnan | Wild | |
| 19 | Kunming, Yunnan | Cultivar | |
| 20 | Chongqing | Wild | |
| 21 | Chongqing | Wild | |
| 22 | Chongqing | Wild | |
| 23 | Changsha, Hunan | Wild | |
| 24 | Enshi, Hubei | Wild | |
| 25 | Myanmar | Wild |
* A. sp means a wild unknown “species” (different variations or genotypes) with no clear classification.
Figure 4Genetic relationships among species based on EST-SSR markers. The dendrogram shows the genetic relationships among 25 individual plants. The scale at the bottom of the dendrogram indicates the level of similarity between the genotypes, bootstrap values (>50) were labeled on the branches from 1000 re-samplings.