| Literature DB >> 19309524 |
Xuanqiang Liang1, Xiaoping Chen, Yanbin Hong, Haiyan Liu, Guiyuan Zhou, Shaoxiong Li, Baozhu Guo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lack of sufficient molecular markers hinders current genetic research in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). It is necessary to develop more molecular markers for potential use in peanut genetic research. With the development of peanut EST projects, a vast amount of available EST sequence data has been generated. These data offered an opportunity to identify SSR in ESTs by data mining.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19309524 PMCID: PMC2678122 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Summary of SSR search after sequences assembled and categorized
| Contigs(bp) | Singlets(bp) | Total (bp) | |
| EST after assembled | 1434(12372129) | 9997(5197116) | 11431(6434245) |
| Identifed SSRs | 180 | 701 | 881 |
| ESTs having SSRs | 156 | 624 | 780 |
| ESTs having more than 1SSR | 19 | 66 | 85 |
| Compound SSRs | 16 | 43 | 59 |
| Bi-type | 73 | 215 | 288 |
| Tri-type | 98 | 465 | 563 |
| Tetra-type | 7 | 8 | 15 |
| Penta-type | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Hexa-type | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Occurrence and number of repeats of 27 SSR motifs in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
| AC/GT | - | - | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | |||
| AG/CT | - | - | 56 | 43 | 31 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 2 | 47 | 218 |
| AT/AT | - | - | 15 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 56 |
| AAC/GTT | 22 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 37 | |||||
| AAG/CTT | 71 | 44 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 153 | ||
| AAT/ATT | 54 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 105 | |
| ACC/GGT | 31 | 22 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 68 | |||||
| ACG/CTG | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 17 | ||||||
| ACT/ATG | 35 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 64 | |||||
| AGC/CGT | 17 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 29 | |||||
| AGG/CCT | 19 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 29 | ||||||
| AGT/ATC | 25 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 43 | |||||
| CCG/CGG | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | ||||||
| AAAG/CTTT | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||||||
| AAAT/ATTT | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| AATC/AGTT | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
| AATT/AATT | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| ACAT/ATGT | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
| AAAAG/CTTTT | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| AAAAT/ATTTT | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| AGTAT/ATATC | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| AAAAAG/CTTTTT | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| AAGACG/CTGCTT | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| AATAGT/ATCATT | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| AATGAT/ACTATT | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
| AGCAGT/ATCGTC | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| AGCTCC/AGGTCG | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Total | 317 | 155 | 127 | 88 | 56 | 23 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 71 | 881 |
Characteristics of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) EST-SSR and efficiency of markers development
| Di | 288 | 55 | 42 | 42 | 10 | 34 |
| AC/GT | 14 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| AG/CT | 218 | 39 | 29 | 29 | 8 | 24 |
| AT/AT | 56 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| Tri | 563 | 221 | 196 | 196 | 14 | 174 |
| AAC/GTT | 37 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| AAG/CTT | 153 | 59 | 51 | 51 | 2 | 43 |
| AAT/ATT | 105 | 27 | 24 | 24 | 4 | 23 |
| ACC/GGT | 68 | 32 | 29 | 29 | 2 | 28 |
| ACG/CTG | 17 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| ACT/ATG | 64 | 26 | 24 | 24 | 2 | 21 |
| AGC/CGT | 29 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| AGG/CCT | 29 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 11 |
| AGT/ATC | 43 | 23 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 19 |
| CCG/CGG | 18 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| Tetra | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| AAAG/CTTT | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AAAT/ATTT | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| AATC/AGTT | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AATT/AATT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ACAT/ATGT | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Penta-type | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| AAAAG/CTTTT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AAAAT/ATTTT | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AGTAT/ATATC | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Hexa-type | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| AAAAAG/CTTTTT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AAGACG/CTGCTT | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| AATAGT/ATCATT | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AATGAT/ACTATT | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AGCAGT/ATCGTC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AGCTCC/AGGTCG | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 881 | 290 | 251 | 251 | 26 | 221 |
Figure 1Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of microsatellite alleles amplified with the primer EM-31. The bands indicated by the arrows were sequenced. M represents the DNA molecular weight marker, and 1–38 represent PI 393531 (1), PI 390693 (2), Qiongshanhuasheng (3), Liaoningsilihong (4), Dedou (5), Guangliu (6), Sanyuening (7), Yueyou 20 (8), Spancross (9), Tennessee Red (10), Xiaoliuqiu (11), Yangjiangpudizan (12), Xihuagoudo (13), Padou (14), Bo-50 (15), Yingdejidouzai (16), Heyuanbanman (17), Tuosunxiaohuasheng (18), Sunoleic 97R (19), Tifrunner (20), Georgia Green (21), NC940-22 (22), A. villosa (23), A. stenosperma (24), A. correntina (25), A. cardenasii (26), A. magna (27), A. duranensis (28), A. chacoensis (29), A. batizocoi (30), A. helodes (31), A. monticola (32), A. pintoi (33), A. paraguariensis (34), A. pusilla (35), A. rigonii (36), A. appressipila (37), A. glabrata (38).
Figure 2Alignment of sequences obtained from five SSR bands amplified by EM-31 primers and original SSR-derived EST sequence(EM-31). Primer sequences are indicated by underlined arrows. Repetitive sequences are indicated in dashed box. Point mutations and indel regions are marked by box with solid line.