Literature DB >> 23869439

A comparison of right posterior sectorectomy with formal right hepatectomy: a dual-institution study.

Sarah B Fisher1, Peter J Kneuertz, Rebecca M Dodson, Sameer H Patel, Shishir K Maithel, Juan M Sarmiento, Maria C Russell, Kenneth Cardona, Michael A Choti, Charles A Staley, Timothy M Pawlik, David A Kooby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Right posterior sectorectomy (RPS) preserves liver volume but typically requires a longer parenchymal transection distance than does right hepatectomy (RH). This study was conducted to define the advantages of one approach over the other.
METHODS: Databases at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed for all patients submitted to RPS or RH between January 2000 and August 2012. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications and 90-day mortality.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing RPS (n = 100) and RH (n = 480), respectively, were similar in demographics, comorbidities, operative indications and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) mean scores (7.8 in the RPS group and 7.7 in the RH group; P = 0.49). A comparison of the RPS group with the RH group showed no significant differences in mean estimated blood loss (697 ml versus 713 ml; P = 0.900), rate of transfusions (19.2% versus 17.1%; P = 0.720), margin-positive resection (9.2% versus 11.6%; P = 0.70), complications (41.8% versus 42.0%; P = 1.000), bile leak (3.0% versus 4.0%; P = 1.000), or length of stay (7.5 days versus 8.3 days; P = 0.360). Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (defined as a postoperative bilirubin level of >7 mg/dl or significant ascites), occurred less frequently after RPS (1.0% versus 8.5%; P = 0.005). Operation type remained an independent determinant of postoperative hepatic insufficiency after controlling for preoperative risk factors (RH: hazard ratio = 9.628, 95% confidence interval 1.295-71.573; P = 0.027). A total of 28 (4.8%) patients died within 90 days; these included 25 (5.2%) patients in the RH group and three (3.0%) in the RPS group (P = 0.449).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar blood loss and overall morbidity, RPS is associated with less hepatic insufficiency than RH. Right posterior sectorectomy is parenchyma-sparing and should be strongly considered when it is technically feasible and oncologically sound.
© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23869439      PMCID: PMC3791114          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  41 in total

1.  Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2005

2.  Total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoo-Seok Yoon; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo Shin Choi; Jin-Young Jang; Kyung-Suk Suh; Sun-Whe Kim; Kuhn Uk Lee; Yong-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 3.  The management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a model for targeted and multidisciplinary therapy of malignancy.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection.

Authors:  J Belghiti; K Hiramatsu; S Benoist; P Massault; A Sauvanet; O Farges
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Anatomical bi- and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections.

Authors:  Elie Chouillard; Daniel Cherqui; Claude Tayar; Francesco Brunetti; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Hepatic surgery for metastases from neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Juan M Sarmiento; Florencia G Que
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Segment-oriented hepatic resection in the management of malignant neoplasms of the liver.

Authors:  K G Billingsley; W R Jarnagin; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  One hundred consecutive hepatic resections. Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique.

Authors:  J D Cunningham; Y Fong; C Shriver; J Melendez; W L Marx; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-10

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection.

Authors:  David A Kooby; Yuman Fong; Arief Suriawinata; Mithat Gonen; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael D'Angelica; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  8 in total

1.  A comparison of laparoscopic resection of posterior segments with formal laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-institution study.

Authors:  Luca Portigliotti; David Fuks; Oleg Slivca; Christophe Bourdeaux; Takeo Nomi; Mostefa Bennamoun; Sergio Gentilli; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: single-center experience and technical aspects.

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Sander Ovaere; Joep Knol; Mathieu Vandeputte; Isabelle Parmentier; Celine De Meyere; Franky Vansteenkiste; Marc Besselink; Hans Pottel; Chris Verslype
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Vincenzo Scuderi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA.

Authors:  Omar Hyder; Teviah Sachs; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic parenchymal preserving hepatic resections in semiprone position for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments.

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Emi Yoshihara; Franky Vansteenkiste; Pieter Jan Steelant; Barbara Van Ooteghem; Hans Pottel; Dirk Devriendt; Frank Van Rooy
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Partial Preservation of Segment IV Confers No Benefit When Performing Extended Right Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  M G Wiggans; S Fisher; H Adwan; S Aroori; M J Bowles; D A Stell
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 7.  Liver Resection and Surgical Strategies for Management of Primary Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Sonia T Orcutt; Daniel A Anaya
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Evaluation of postoperative ascites after somatostatin infusion following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma by laparotomy: a multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial (SOMAPROTECT).

Authors:  Kayvan Mohkam; Michel Rayar; Jean-Philippe Adam; Fabrice Muscari; Agnès Rode; Philippe Merle; Pierre Pradat; Stéphanie Bauler; Isabelle Delfour; Laurence Chiche; Christian Ducerf; Karim Boudjema; Mickaël Lesurtel; Christophe Laurent; Jean-Yves Mabrut
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.