Literature DB >> 27752815

A comparison of laparoscopic resection of posterior segments with formal laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-institution study.

Luca Portigliotti1,2, David Fuks3,4, Oleg Slivca3, Christophe Bourdeaux3, Takeo Nomi3, Mostefa Bennamoun5, Sergio Gentilli6, Brice Gayet3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of by laparoscopic resection for lesions located in postero-superior segments is unclear. The present series aimed at comparing intraoperative and post-operative results in patients undergoing either laparoscopic RPS or laparoscopic RH for colorectal liver metastases located in the right postero-superior segments.
METHODS: From 2000 to 2015, patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of segment 6 and/or 7 (RPS group) were compared with those with right hepatectomy (RH group) in terms of tumour characteristics, surgical treatment, and short-term outcomes.
RESULTS: Among the 177 selected patients, 78 (44.1 %) had laparoscopic RPS and 99 (55.9 %) a laparoscopic RH. Among RPS patients, 26 (33.3 %) underwent anatomical resection of either segment 7, 8 or both. Three (3 %) patients undergoing RH died in the post-operative course and none in the RPS group. Sixty-three (35.5 %) patients experienced post-operative complications, including major complications in 24 (13.5 %) patients. Liver failure (17.1 vs. 0 %, p = 000.1), biliary leakage (6.0 vs. 1.2 %, p = 00.1), intra-abdominal collection (19.1 vs. 2.5 %, p = 000.1), and pulmonary complication (16.1 vs. 1.2 %, p = 000.1) were significantly increased in the RH group.
CONCLUSION: The present series suggests that patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of CRLM located in the postero-superior segments developed significantly less complications than patients undergoing formal RH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic liver resection; Post-operative outcomes; Posterior liver segments; Right hepatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27752815     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5261-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Silvio Balzan; Jacques Belghiti; Olivier Farges; Satoshi Ogata; Alain Sauvanet; Didier Delefosse; François Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Prediction, prevention and management of postresection liver failure.

Authors:  J S Hammond; I N Guha; I J Beckingham; D N Lobo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Laparoscopic liver resection for malignancy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Eyas Alkhalili; Eren Berber
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver.

Authors:  Paulo Herman; Jaime Krüger; Renato Lupinacci; Fabricio Coelho; Marcos Perini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.

Authors:  Alan J Koffron; Greg Auffenberg; Robert Kung; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi Yin; Xinxiang Fan; Hua Ye; Dong Yin; Jie Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

Authors:  William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients.

Authors:  Suzanne C Schiffman; Kevin H Kim; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Taillieu; Celine De Meyere; Frederiek Nuytens; Chris Verslype; Mathieu D'Hondt
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.