Literature DB >> 24037738

Plateau effect of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes.

Shancheng Ren1, Jianfeng Xu, Tie Zhou, Haowen Jiang, Haitao Chen, Fang Liu, Rong Na, Limin Zhang, Yishuo Wu, Jielin Sun, Bo Yang, Xu Gao, S Lilly Zheng, Chuanliang Xu, Qiang Ding, Yinghao Sun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Additional prostate cancer (PCa) risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) continue to be identified. It is unclear whether addition of newly identified SNPs improves the discriminative performance of biopsy outcomes over previously established SNPs.
METHODS: A total of 667 consecutive patients that underwent prostate biopsy for detection of PCa at Huashan Hospital and Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China were recruited. Genetic scores were calculated for each patient using various combinations of 29 PCa risk-associated SNPs. Performance of these genetic scores for discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes were compared using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: The discriminative performance of genetic score derived from a panel of all 29 SNPs (24 previous and 5 new) was similar to that derived from the 24 previously established SNPs, the AUC of which were 0.60 and 0.61, respectively (P = 0.72). When SNPs with the strongest effect on PCa risk (ranked based on contribution to the total genetic variance from an external study) were sequentially added to the models for calculating genetic score, the AUC gradually increased and peaked at 0.62 with the top 13 strongest SNPs. Under the 13-SNP model, the PCa detection rate was 21.52%, 36.74%, and 51.98%, respectively for men with low (<0.5), intermediate (0.5-1.5), and high (>1.5) genetic score, P-trend = 9.91 × 10(-6).
CONCLUSION: Genetic score based on PCa risk-associated SNPs implicated to date is a significant predictor of biopsy outcome. Additional small-effect PCa risk-associated SNPs to be discovered in the future are unlikely to further improve predictive performance.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; ChinaPCa; SNPs; biopsy; genetic score; prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037738      PMCID: PMC3910089          DOI: 10.1002/pros.22721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  53 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Relative risk of prostate cancer for men with affected relatives: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deborah Watkins Bruner; Dirk Moore; Alicia Parlanti; Joanne Dorgan; Paul Engstrom
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations.

Authors:  Laufey T Amundadottir; Patrick Sulem; Julius Gudmundsson; Agnar Helgason; Adam Baker; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Jesus Sainz; Margret Jakobsdottir; Jelena Kostic; Droplaug N Magnusdottir; Shyamali Ghosh; Kari Agnarsson; Birgitta Birgisdottir; Louise Le Roux; Adalheidur Olafsdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Margret Andresdottir; Olafia Svandis Gretarsdottir; Jon T Bergthorsson; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Arnaldur Gylfason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Andrei Manolescu; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Gudmundur Geirsson; Helgi Isaksson; Julie Douglas; Jan-Erik Johansson; Katarina Bälter; Fredrik Wiklund; James E Montie; Xiaoying Yu; Brian K Suarez; Carole Ober; Kathleen A Cooney; Henrik Gronberg; William J Catalona; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Two variants on chromosome 17 confer prostate cancer risk, and the one in TCF2 protects against type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Jon T Bergthorsson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Andrei Manolescu; Thorunn Rafnar; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Adam Baker; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Margret Jakobsdottir; Thorarinn Blondal; Simon N Stacey; Agnar Helgason; Steinunn Gunnarsdottir; Adalheidur Olafsdottir; Kari T Kristinsson; Birgitta Birgisdottir; Shyamali Ghosh; Steinunn Thorlacius; Dana Magnusdottir; Gerdur Stefansdottir; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Yu Bagger; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Andrew D Morris; Charlotte H Kimber; Adebowale Adeyemo; Yuanxiu Chen; Jie Zhou; Wing-Yee So; Peter C Y Tong; Maggie C Y Ng; Torben Hansen; Gitte Andersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Torben Jorgensen; Alejandro Tres; Fernando Fuertes; Manuel Ruiz-Echarri; Laura Asin; Berta Saez; Erica van Boven; Siem Klaver; Dorine W Swinkels; Katja K Aben; Theresa Graif; John Cashy; Brian K Suarez; Onco van Vierssen Trip; Michael L Frigge; Carole Ober; Marten H Hofker; Cisca Wijmenga; Claus Christiansen; Daniel J Rader; Colin N A Palmer; Charles Rotimi; Juliana C N Chan; Oluf Pedersen; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Rafn Benediktsson; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Jose I Mayordomo; William J Catalona; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Empiric risk of prostate carcinoma for relatives of patients with prostate carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maurice P A Zeegers; Annemarie Jellema; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24.

Authors:  Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Andrei Manolescu; Laufey T Amundadottir; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Thorunn Rafnar; Jon T Bergthorsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Adam Baker; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Margret Jakobsdottir; Jianfeng Xu; Thorarinn Blondal; Jelena Kostic; Jielin Sun; Shyamali Ghosh; Simon N Stacey; Magali Mouy; Jona Saemundsdottir; Valgerdur M Backman; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Alejandro Tres; Alan W Partin; Marjo T Albers-Akkers; Javier Godino-Ivan Marcos; Patrick C Walsh; Dorine W Swinkels; Sebastian Navarrete; Sarah D Isaacs; Katja K Aben; Theresa Graif; John Cashy; Manuel Ruiz-Echarri; Kathleen E Wiley; Brian K Suarez; J Alfred Witjes; Mike Frigge; Carole Ober; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Jose I Mayordomo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; William B Isaacs; William J Catalona; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24.

Authors:  Meredith Yeager; Nick Orr; Richard B Hayes; Kevin B Jacobs; Peter Kraft; Sholom Wacholder; Mark J Minichiello; Paul Fearnhead; Kai Yu; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zhaoming Wang; Robert Welch; Brian J Staats; Eugenia E Calle; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael J Thun; Carmen Rodriguez; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo; Stephanie Weinstein; Fredrick R Schumacher; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Olivier Cussenot; Antoine Valeri; Gerald L Andriole; Edward P Gelmann; Margaret Tucker; Daniela S Gerhard; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert Hoover; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; Gilles Thomas
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  L E Johns; R S Houlston
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP.

Authors:  David Duggan; Siqun L Zheng; Michele Knowlton; Debbie Benitez; Latchezar Dimitrov; Fredrik Wiklund; Christiane Robbins; Sarah D Isaacs; Yu Cheng; Ge Li; Jielin Sun; Bao-Li Chang; Leslie Marovich; Kathleen E Wiley; Katarina Bälter; Pär Stattin; Hans-Olov Adami; Marta Gielzak; Guifang Yan; Jurga Sauvageot; Wennuan Liu; Jin Woo Kim; Eugene R Bleecker; Deborah A Meyers; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; William B Isaacs; Henrik Grönberg; Jianfeng Xu; John D Carpten
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  A genetic-based approach to personalized prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; William J Catalona; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Validation of the novel susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yishuo Wu; Haitao Chen; Ying Ji; Rong Na; Zengnan Mo; Dingwei Ye; Meilin Wang; Jun Qi; Xiaoling Lin; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu; S Lilly Zheng; Yinghao Sun; Wei Meng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Inherited risk assessment and its clinical utility for predicting prostate cancer from diagnostic prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; W Kyle Resurreccion; Zhuqing Shi; Jun Wei; Chi-Hsiung Wang; S Lilly Zheng; Peter J Hulick; Ashley E Ross; Christian P Pavlovich; Brian T Helfand; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.455

4.  Application of metastatic biopsy based on "When, Who, Why, Where, How (4W1H)" principle in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zihao Liu; Lei Wang; Yuchi Zhou; Chao Wang; Yuan Ma; Yang Zhao; Jing Tian; Hua Huang; Haitao Wang; Yong Wang; Yuanjie Niu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

Review 5.  Polygenic risk score for genetic evaluation of prostate cancer risk in Asian populations: A narrative review.

Authors:  Sang Hun Song; Seok Soo Byun
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

6.  Development and external validation of a prostate health index-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in predicting prostate cancer risk and therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  Thomas Van den Broeck; Steven Joniau; Liesbeth Clinckemalie; Christine Helsen; Stefan Prekovic; Lien Spans; Lorenzo Tosco; Hendrik Van Poppel; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The Xu's chart for prostate biopsy: a visual presentation of the added value of biomarkers to prostate-specific antigen for estimating detection rates of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Current early diagnostic biomarkers of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Min Qu; Shan-Cheng Ren; Ying-Hao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Urinary melatonin-sulfate/cortisol ratio and the presence of prostate cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Tai; Shu-Pin Huang; Bo-Ying Bao; Ming-Tsang Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.