Literature DB >> 23868487

Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Rebecca Glover-Kudon1, Amy DeGroff, Elizabeth A Rohan, Judith Preissle, Jennifer E Boehm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2005 through 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 5 sites to implement a colorectal cancer screening program for uninsured, low-income populations. These 5 sites composed a demonstration project intended to explore the feasibility of establishing a national colorectal cancer screening program through various service delivery models.
METHODS: A longitudinal, multiple case study was conducted to understand and document program implementation processes. Using metaphor as a qualitative analytic technique, evaluators identified stages of maturation across the programmatic life cycle.
RESULTS: Analysis rendered a working theory of program development during screening implementation. In early stages, program staff built relationships with CDC and local partners around screening readiness, faced real-world challenges putting program policies into practice, revised initial program designs, and developed new professional skills. Midterm implementation was defined by establishing program cohesiveness and expanding programmatic reach. In later stages of implementation, staff focused on sustainability and formal program closeout, which prompted reflection about personal and programmatic accomplishments.
CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration sites evolved through common developmental stages during screening implementation. Findings elucidate ways to target technical assistance to more efficiently move programs along their maturation trajectory. In practical terms, the time and cost associated with guiding a program to maturity may be potentially shortened to maximize return on investment for both organizations and clients receiving service benefits.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer screening; multiple case study; program development; program evaluation; program implementation; qualitative methods; technical assistance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868487      PMCID: PMC4618373          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  27 in total

1.  An academic medical center model for community colorectal cancer screening: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstration program experience.

Authors:  Dorothy S Lane; Mary F Cavanagh; Catherine R Messina; Joseph C Anderson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Challenges and strategies in applying performance measurement to federal public health programs.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Michael Schooley; Thomas Chapel; Theodore H Poister
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-02-26

Review 3.  Evaluability assessment to improve public health policies, programs, and practices.

Authors:  Laura C Leviton; Laura Kettel Khan; Debra Rog; Nicola Dawkins; David Cotton
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Climbing Everest: oncology work as an expedition in caring.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rohan; Jane Bausch
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2009

5.  Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey.

Authors:  Mary Ann Scheirer; Gretchen Hartling; Diane Hagerman
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-08-23

6.  Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008.

Authors:  Sun Hee Rim; Djenaba A Joseph; C Brooke Steele; Trevor D Thompson; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2011-01-14

7.  Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Jennifer E Boehm; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Judith Preissle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Maggie C Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Debra Holden; Sonya Goode Green; Jennifer Boehm; Laura C Seeff; Florence Tangka
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Cost of starting colorectal cancer screening programs: results from five federally funded demonstration programs.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Bela Bapat; Laura C Seeff; Amy DeGroff; James Gardner; A Blythe Ryerson; Marion Nadel; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Jennifer E Boehm; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Judith Preissle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.

Authors:  Jennifer E Boehm; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Simulated Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions, North Carolina.

Authors:  Kristen Hassmiller Lich; David A Cornejo; Maria E Mayorga; Michael Pignone; Florence K L Tangka; Lisa C Richardson; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Anne-Marie Meyer; Ingrid J Hall; Judith Lee Smith; Todd A Durham; Steven A Chall; Trisha M Crutchfield; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.830

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.