Literature DB >> 22152166

Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.

Donald L Patrick1, Laurie B Burke, Chad J Gwaltney, Nancy Kline Leidy, Mona L Martin, Elizabeth Molsen, Lena Ring.   

Abstract

The importance of content validity in developing patient reported outcomes (PRO) instruments is stressed by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Content validity is the extent to which an instrument measures the important aspects of concepts developers or users purport it to assess. A PRO instrument measures the concepts most relevant and important to a patient's condition and its treatment. For PRO instruments, items and domains as reflected in the scores of an instrument should be important to the target population and comprehensive with respect to patient concerns. Documentation of target population input in item generation, as well as evaluation of patient understanding through cognitive interviewing, can provide the evidence for content validity. Part 1 of this task force report covers elicitation of key concepts using qualitative focus groups and/or interviews to inform content and structure of a new PRO instrument. Building on qualitative interviews and focus groups used to elicit concepts, cognitive interviews help developers craft items that can be understood by respondents in the target population and can ultimately confirm that the final instrument is appropriate, comprehensive, and understandable in the target population. Part 2 details: 1) the methods for conducting cognitive interviews that address patient understanding of items, instructions, and response options; and 2) the methods for tracking item development through the various stages of research and preparing this tracking for submission to regulatory agencies. The task force report's two parts are meant to be read together. They are intended to offer suggestions for good practice in planning, executing, and documenting qualitative studies that are used to support the content validity of PRO instruments to be used in medical product evaluation.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22152166     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  322 in total

1.  Editorial commentary: Asking the right questions: morbidity, mortality, and measuring what's important in unbiased evaluations of antimicrobials.

Authors:  John H Powers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; John H Powers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Concept-elicitation phase for the development of the pediatric patient-reported outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Bryce B Reeve; Justin N Baker; Christa E Martens; Molly McFatrich; Catriona Mowbray; Diana Palma; Lillian Sung; Deborah Tomlinson; Janice Withycombe; Pamela Hinds
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Quality of life and functional vision concerns of children with cataracts and their parents.

Authors:  Y S Castañeda; C S Cheng-Patel; D A Leske; S M Wernimont; S R Hatt; L Liebermann; E E Birch; J M Holmes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Night-time symptoms and their impact on sleep in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitors: a qualitative patient interview study.

Authors:  Anna Rydén; Mona Martin; Katarina Halling; Anna Niklasson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  More than Just Minutes of Stiffness in the Morning: Report from the OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Group Stiffness Breakout Sessions.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Orbai; Serena Halls; Sarah Hewlett; Susan J Bartlett; Amye L Leong; Clifton O Bingham
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Brazilian-Portuguese Linguistic Validation of the Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcome Instrument.

Authors:  Rafael Denadai; Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Anelise Sabbag; Rafael Andrade Ribeiro; Celso Luiz Buzzo; Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral; Man Hung; Jonathan R Skirko
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Development and Psychometric Validation of the BREAST-Q Sensation Module for Women Undergoing Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Elena Tsangaris; Anne F Klassen; Manraj N Kaur; Sophocles Voineskos; Louise Bordeleau; Toni Zhong; Justin Broyles; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Fatigue in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type II and congenital myopathies: evaluation of the fatigue severity scale.

Authors:  Ulla Werlauff; A Højberg; R Firla-Holme; B F Steffensen; J Vissing
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A conceptual and disease model framework for osteoporotic kyphosis.

Authors:  M Bayliss; C Miltenburger; M White; L Alvares
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.