Jonathan M Coutinho1, Sheldon Derkatch1, Alphonse R J Potvin1, George Tomlinson1, Tim-Rasmus Kiehl1, Frank L Silver1, Daniel M Mandell2. 1. From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (J.M.C., S.D., D.M.M.), Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (A.R.J.P., F.L.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.-R.K.), University Health Network and the University of Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (G.T.), University of Toronto; and Department of Medicine (G.T.), University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 2. From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (J.M.C., S.D., D.M.M.), Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine (A.R.J.P., F.L.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.-R.K.), University Health Network and the University of Toronto; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (G.T.), University of Toronto; and Department of Medicine (G.T.), University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. danny.mandell@uhn.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether large (≥3 mm thick) but nonstenotic (<50%) carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque predominantly occurs ipsilateral rather than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study. Using a stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients with anterior circulation embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Using CT angiography, we measured carotid plaque size (thickness, mm) and carotid artery stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method) for each patient. We dichotomized plaque size at several predefined thresholds and calculated the frequency of plaque size above each threshold ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke. RESULTS: We included 85 patients with ESUS. Plaque with thickness ≥5 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 11% of patients, and contralateral in 1% (9/85 vs 1/85; p = 0.008). Plaque with thickness ≥4 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 19% of patients, and contralateral in 5% (16/85 vs 4/85; p = 0.002). Plaque with thickness ≥3 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 35% of patients, and contralateral in 15% (30/85 vs 13/85; p = 0.001). There was no difference in percentage stenosis ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke (p = 0.98), and weak correlation between plaque size and stenosis (R(2) = 0.26, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Large but nonstenotic carotid artery plaque is considerably more common ipsilateral than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke, suggesting that nonstenotic plaque is an underrecognized cause of stroke. We measured plaque size using CT angiography, a method that could be easily implemented in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether large (≥3 mm thick) but nonstenotic (<50%) carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque predominantly occurs ipsilateral rather than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study. Using a stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients with anterior circulation embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Using CT angiography, we measured carotid plaque size (thickness, mm) and carotid artery stenosis (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method) for each patient. We dichotomized plaque size at several predefined thresholds and calculated the frequency of plaque size above each threshold ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke. RESULTS: We included 85 patients with ESUS. Plaque with thickness ≥5 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 11% of patients, and contralateral in 1% (9/85 vs 1/85; p = 0.008). Plaque with thickness ≥4 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 19% of patients, and contralateral in 5% (16/85 vs 4/85; p = 0.002). Plaque with thickness ≥3 mm was present ipsilateral to stroke in 35% of patients, and contralateral in 15% (30/85 vs 13/85; p = 0.001). There was no difference in percentage stenosis ipsilateral vs contralateral to stroke (p = 0.98), and weak correlation between plaque size and stenosis (R(2) = 0.26, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Large but nonstenotic carotid artery plaque is considerably more common ipsilateral than contralateral to cryptogenic stroke, suggesting that nonstenotic plaque is an underrecognized cause of stroke. We measured plaque size using CT angiography, a method that could be easily implemented in clinical practice.
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Sander Cretier; Harald C Groen; Philip Homburg; Hamit Cakir; Jolanda J Wentzel; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A Gupta; E E Mtui; H Baradaran; G Salama; A Pandya; H Kamel; A Giambrone; P C Sanelli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert G Hart; Hans-Christoph Diener; Shelagh B Coutts; J Donald Easton; Christopher B Granger; Martin J O'Donnell; Ralph L Sacco; Stuart J Connolly Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Alexander E Merkler; Hediyeh Baradaran; Iván Díaz; Neal S Parikh; Scott E Kasner; David J Gladstone; Costantino Iadecola; Ajay Gupta Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: James E Siegler; Jesse M Thon; John H Woo; David Do; Steven R Messé; Brett Cucchiara Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: P I Sajedi; J N Gonzalez; C A Cronin; T Kouo; A Steven; J Zhuo; O Thompson; R Castellani; S J Kittner; D Gandhi; P Raghavan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Emilio Rodríguez-Castro; Susana Arias-Rivas; María Santamaría-Cadavid; Iria López-Dequidt; Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez; Antonio Jesús Mosqueira; Miguel Blanco Ulla; Fernando Vázquez Herrero; José Antonio Castiñeira; Elena Martínez-Sáez; Edurne Pérez Béliz; Nilo Mosquera; Diego Caicedo; Máximo Fraga; José Manuel Pumar Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 6.682
Authors: Hooman Kamel; Lesly A Pearce; George Ntaios; David J Gladstone; Kanjana Perera; Risto O Roine; Elena Meseguer; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Scott D Berkowitz; Hardi Mundl; Mukul Sharma; Stuart J Connolly; Robert G Hart; Jeff S Healey Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: N Singh; J Ospel; A Mayank; M Marko; O O Zaidat; N H Mueller-Kronast; D S Liebeskind; M Goyal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.966