Literature DB >> 23865516

Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein.

Ramon Diaz-Arrastia1, Kevin K W Wang, Linda Papa, Marco D Sorani, John K Yue, Ava M Puccio, Paul J McMahon, Tomoo Inoue, Esther L Yuh, Hester F Lingsma, Andrew I R Maas, Alex B Valadka, David O Okonkwo, Geoffrey T Manley.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are important for accurate diagnosis of complex disorders such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). For a complex and multifaceted condition such as TBI, it is likely that a single biomarker will not reflect the full spectrum of the response of brain tissue to injury. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are among of the most widely studied biomarkers for TBI. Because UCH-L1 and GFAP measure distinct molecular events, we hypothesized that analysis of both biomarkers would be superior to analysis of each alone for the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. Serum levels of UCH-L1 and GFAP were measured in a cohort of 206 patients with TBI enrolled in a multicenter observational study (Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury [TRACK-TBI]). Levels of the two biomarkers were weakly correlated to each other (r=0.364). Each biomarker in isolation had good sensitivity and sensitivity for discriminating between TBI patients and healthy controls (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87 and 0.91 for UCH-L1 and GFAP, respectively). When biomarkers were combined, superior sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing TBI was obtained (AUC 0.94). Both biomarkers discriminated between TBI patients with intracranial lesions on CT scan and those without such lesions, but GFAP measures were significantly more sensitive and specific (AUC 0.88 vs. 0.71 for UCH-L1). For association with outcome 3 months after injury, neither biomarker had adequate sensitivity and specificity (AUC 0.65-0.74, for GFAP, and 0.59-0.80 for UCH-L1, depending upon Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended [GOS-E] threshold used). Our results support a role for multiple biomarker measurements in TBI research. ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01565551).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23865516      PMCID: PMC3880090          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  22 in total

1.  Elevated levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury are associated with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Lawrence M Lewis; Jay L Falk; Zhiqun Zhang; Salvatore Silvestri; Philip Giordano; Gretchen M Brophy; Jason A Demery; Neha K Dixit; Ian Ferguson; Ming Cheng Liu; Jixiang Mo; Linnet Akinyi; Kara Schmid; Stefania Mondello; Claudia S Robertson; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 2.  Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the biospecimens and biomarkers working group.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Manley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Mary Brophy; Doortje Engel; Clay Goodman; Katrina Gwinn; Timothy D Veenstra; Geoffrey Ling; Andrew K Ottens; Frank Tortella; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P E Vos; B Jacobs; T M J C Andriessen; K J B Lamers; G F Borm; T Beems; M Edwards; C F Rosmalen; J L M Vissers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998--2000.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bazarian; Jason McClung; Manish N Shah; Yen Ting Cheng; William Flesher; Jess Kraus
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ann-Christine Duhaime; Alisa D Gean; E Mark Haacke; Ramona Hicks; Max Wintermark; Pratik Mukherjee; David Brody; Lawrence Latour; Gerard Riedy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.

Authors:  J T Wilson; L E Pettigrew; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Biokinetic analysis of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in severe traumatic brain injury patient biofluids.

Authors:  Gretchen M Brophy; Stefania Mondello; Linda Papa; Steven A Robicsek; Andrea Gabrielli; Joseph Tepas; Andras Buki; Claudia Robertson; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Saatman; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Ross Bullock; Andrew I R Maas; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John K Yue; Mary J Vassar; Hester F Lingsma; Shelly R Cooper; David O Okonkwo; Alex B Valadka; Wayne A Gordon; Andrew I R Maas; Pratik Mukherjee; Esther L Yuh; Ava M Puccio; David M Schnyer; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Notch-induced rat and human bone marrow stromal cell grafts reduce ischemic cell loss and ameliorate behavioral deficits in chronic stroke animals.

Authors:  Takao Yasuhara; Noriyuki Matsukawa; Koichi Hara; Mina Maki; Mohammed M Ali; Seong Jin Yu; Eunkyung Bae; Guolong Yu; Lin Xu; Michael McGrogan; Krys Bankiewicz; Casey Case; Cesar V Borlongan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.272

View more
  136 in total

Review 1.  Fluid biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury and related conditions.

Authors:  Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Neuronal Biomarker Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase Detects Traumatic Intracranial Lesions on Computed Tomography in Children and Youth with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Manoj K Mittal; Jose Ramirez; Salvatore Silvestri; Philip Giordano; Carolina F Braga; Ciara N Tan; Neema J Ameli; Marco A Lopez; Crystal A Haeussler; Diego Mendez Giordano; Mark R Zonfrillo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Circulating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Has Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Frederick K Korley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Alan H B Wu; John K Yue; Geoffrey T Manley; Haris I Sair; Jennifer Van Eyk; Allen D Everett; David O Okonkwo; Alex B Valadka; Wayne A Gordon; Andrew I R Maas; Pratik Mukherjee; Esther L Yuh; Hester F Lingsma; Ava M Puccio; David M Schnyer
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Current status of fluid biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Kulbe; James W Geddes
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau-Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers.

Authors:  Richard Rubenstein; Binggong Chang; John K Yue; Allen Chiu; Ethan A Winkler; Ava M Puccio; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Alex B Valadka; Wayne A Gordon; David O Okonkwo; Peter Davies; Sanjeev Agarwal; Fan Lin; George Sarkis; Hamad Yadikar; Zhihui Yang; Geoffrey T Manley; Kevin K W Wang; Shelly R Cooper; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Allison J Borrasso; Tomoo Inoue; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; David M Schnyer; Mary J Vassar
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  Raising the Bar for Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarker Research: Methods Make a Difference.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Correlation of Blood Biomarkers and Biomarker Panels with Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jussi P Posti; Riikka S K Takala; Linnéa Lagerstedt; Alex M Dickens; Iftakher Hossain; Mehrbod Mohammadian; Henna Ala-Seppälä; Janek Frantzén; Mark van Gils; Peter J Hutchinson; Ari J Katila; Henna-Riikka Maanpää; David K Menon; Virginia F Newcombe; Jussi Tallus; Kevin Hrusovsky; David H Wilson; Jessica Gill; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Olli Tenovuo; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Protein biomarkers of epileptogenicity after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston; Alaa Kamnaksh
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Diagnosis of traumatic brain injury using miRNA signatures in nanomagnetically isolated brain-derived extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  J Ko; M Hemphill; Z Yang; E Sewell; Y J Na; D K Sandsmark; M Haber; S A Fisher; E A Torre; K C Svane; A Omelchenko; B L Firestein; R Diaz-Arrastia; J Kim; D F Meaney; D Issadore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Gender differences in awareness and outcomes during acute traumatic brain injury recovery.

Authors:  Janet P Niemeier; Paul B Perrin; Megan G Holcomb; Cynthia D Rolston; Laura K Artman; Juan Lu; Karine S Nersessova
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.