Literature DB >> 23861078

In vitro metabolism and bioavailability tests for endocrine active substances: what is needed next for regulatory purposes?

Miriam N Jacobs1, Susan C Laws, Kate Willett, Pat Schmieder, Jenny Odum, Toine F Bovee.   

Abstract

Legislation and prospective legislative proposals internationally (may) require that chemicals be tested for their ability to disrupt the hormonal systems of mammals. Chemicals found to test positive in vitro are considered to be endocrine active substances (EAS) and may be putative endocrine disruptors (EDs) in vivo. While there is a growing body of international in vitro test guidelines addressing EAS mechanisms and modes of action, to date there are still few or no standardized methods to incorporate metabolic and toxicokinetic aspects into these in vitro tests for EAS. In vitro assays for EAS should incorporate metabolic enzyme systems to better address the relevance of EAS tests to in vivo adverse outcome pathways, and a previous OECD review paper indicated how this could be done. This paper revisits those recommendations, addressing where research and funding efforts are needed to expedite the development of suitable in vitro metabolism systems to improve the accuracy of in vitro assays for identifying EAS and EDs. Recommendations are made for projects to support short, medium, and long-term goals. The complexity of in vivo metabolism presents major challenges for the development of predictive models suitable for the extrapolation of data from in silico/in vitro approaches to models that can occur in vivo. Therefore, the long-term recommendations are intended to foster an international harmonization of databases, delineation of metabolic pathways, and development of predictive tools that will provide a fundamental understanding of the processes by which metabolism occurs, increasing the predictive accuracy of in silico/in vitro methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23861078     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2013.3.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  13 in total

1.  Extending an in vitro panel for estrogenicity testing: the added value of bioassays for measuring antiandrogenic activities and effects on steroidogenesis.

Authors:  Si Wang; Jeroen C W Rijk; Harrie T Besselink; René Houtman; Ad A C M Peijnenburg; Abraham Brouwer; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Toine F H Bovee
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  A Demonstration of the Uncertainty in Predicting the Estrogenic Activity of Individual Chemicals and Mixtures From an In Vitro Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assay (T47D-KBluc) to the In Vivo Uterotrophic Assay Using Oral Exposure.

Authors:  Justin M Conley; Bethany R Hannas; Johnathan R Furr; Vickie S Wilson; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Candidate Proficiency Test Chemicals to Address Industrial Chemical Applicability Domains for in vitro Human Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Induction.

Authors:  Miriam Naomi Jacobs; Barbara Kubickova; Eugene Boshoff
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) inducers and estrogen receptor (ER) activities in surface sediments of Three Gorges Reservoir, China evaluated with in vitro cell bioassays.

Authors:  Jingxian Wang; Toine F H Bovee; Yonghong Bi; Silke Bernhöft; Karl-Werner Schramm
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  mRNA transfection retrofits cell-based assays with xenobiotic metabolism.

Authors:  Danica E DeGroot; Adam Swank; Russell S Thomas; Mark Strynar; Mi-Young Lee; Paul L Carmichael; Steven O Simmons
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  A Workflow for Identifying Metabolically Active Chemicals to Complement in vitro Toxicity Screening.

Authors:  Jeremy A Leonard; Caroline Stevens; Kamel Mansouri; Daniel Chang; Harish Pudukodu; Sherrie Smith; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018-05

7.  The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes Platform Retrofits an Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Assay With Metabolic Competence.

Authors:  Chad Deisenroth; Danica E DeGroot; Todd Zurlinden; Andrew Eicher; James McCord; Mi-Young Lee; Paul Carmichael; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Comparison of the In Vivo Biotransformation of Two Emerging Estrogenic Contaminants, BP2 and BPS, in Zebrafish Embryos and Adults.

Authors:  Vincent Le Fol; François Brion; Anne Hillenweck; Elisabeth Perdu; Sandrine Bruel; Selim Aït-Aïssa; Jean-Pierre Cravedi; Daniel Zalko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Nonanimal Models for Acute Toxicity Evaluations: Applying Data-Driven Profiling and Read-Across.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Judy Strickland; Agnes L Karmaus; Wenyi Wang; Sunil Shende; Thomas Hartung; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The GOLIATH Project: Towards an Internationally Harmonised Approach for Testing Metabolism Disrupting Compounds.

Authors:  Juliette Legler; Daniel Zalko; Fabien Jourdan; Miriam Jacobs; Bernard Fromenty; Patrick Balaguer; William Bourguet; Vesna Munic Kos; Angel Nadal; Claire Beausoleil; Susana Cristobal; Sylvie Remy; Sibylle Ermler; Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci; Julian L Griffin; Bruce Blumberg; Christophe Chesné; Sebastian Hoffmann; Patrik L Andersson; Jorke H Kamstra
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.