Literature DB >> 27473340

A Demonstration of the Uncertainty in Predicting the Estrogenic Activity of Individual Chemicals and Mixtures From an In Vitro Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assay (T47D-KBluc) to the In Vivo Uterotrophic Assay Using Oral Exposure.

Justin M Conley1, Bethany R Hannas2, Johnathan R Furr3, Vickie S Wilson1, L Earl Gray4.   

Abstract

In vitro estrogen receptor assays are valuable tools for identifying environmental samples and chemicals that display estrogenic activity. However, in vitro potency cannot necessarily be extrapolated to estimates of in vivo potency because in vitro assays are currently unable to fully account for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. To explore this issue, we calculated relative potency factors (RPF), using 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2) as the reference compound, for several chemicals and mixtures in the T47D-KBluc estrogen receptor transactivation assay. In vitro RPFs were used to predict rat oral uterotrophic assay responses for these chemicals and mixtures. EE2, 17β-estradiol (E2), benzyl-butyl phthalate (BBP), bisphenol-A (BPA), bisphenol-AF (BPAF), bisphenol-C (BPC), bisphenol-S (BPS), and methoxychlor (MET) were tested individually, while BPS + MET, BPAF + MET, and BPAF + BPC + BPS + EE2 + MET were tested as equipotent mixtures. In vivo ED50 values for BPA, BPAF, and BPC were accurately predicted using in vitro data; however, E2 was less potent than predicted, BBP was a false positive, and BPS and MET were 76.6 and 368.3-fold more active in vivo than predicted from the in vitro potency, respectively. Further, mixture ED50 values were more accurately predicted by the dose addition model using individual chemical in vivo uterotrophic data (0.7-1.5-fold difference from observed) than in vitro data (1.4-86.8-fold). Overall, these data illustrate the potential for both underestimating and overestimating in vivo potency from predictions made with in vitro data for compounds that undergo substantial disposition following oral administration. Accounting for aspects of toxicokinetics, notably metabolism, in in vitro models will be necessary for accurate in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolations. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2016. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T47D-KBluc; bisphenols; estrogen; mixture; oral exposure; uterotrophic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27473340      PMCID: PMC5036621          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  62 in total

1.  Relationship between the results of in vitro receptor binding assay to human estrogen receptor alpha and in vivo uterotrophic assay: comparative study with 65 selected chemicals.

Authors:  Yumi Akahori; Makoto Nakai; Kanji Yamasaki; Mineo Takatsuki; Yasuyuki Shimohigashi; Masahiro Ohtaki
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  The relative bioavailability and metabolism of bisphenol A in rats is dependent upon the route of administration.

Authors:  L H Pottenger; J Y Domoradzki; D A Markham; S C Hansen; S Z Cagen; J M Waechter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Modelling defined mixtures of environmental oestrogens found in domestic animal and sewage treatment effluents using an in vitro oestrogen-mediated transcriptional activation assay (T47D-KBluc).

Authors:  Dieldrich S Bermudez; L Earl Gray; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2012-06

4.  Assessment of estrogenic potential of di-n-butyl phthalate and butyl benzyl phthalate in vivo.

Authors:  Rahish Ahmad; Yogendra Verma; Anil K Gautam; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Measurement of estrogenic activity of chemicals for the development of new dental polymers.

Authors:  Y Hashimoto; Y Moriguchi; H Oshima; M Kawaguchi; K Miyazaki; M Nakamura
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2001 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Modeling the interaction of binary and ternary mixtures of estradiol with bisphenol A and bisphenol AF in an in vitro estrogen-mediated transcriptional activation assay (T47D-KBluc).

Authors:  Dieldrich S Bermudez; Leon E Gray; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Examination of the in vitro and in vivo estrogenic activities of eight commercial phthalate esters.

Authors:  T R Zacharewski; M D Meek; J H Clemons; Z F Wu; M R Fielden; J B Matthews
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Metabolism of the endocrine disruptor pesticide-methoxychlor by human P450s: pathways involving a novel catechol metabolite.

Authors:  Yiding Hu; David Kupfer
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Response-specific and ligand dose-dependent modulation of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha activity by ERbeta in the uterus.

Authors:  Jonna Frasor; Daniel H Barnett; Jeanne M Danes; Rex Hess; Albert F Parlow; Benita S Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 10.  Detection of the effects of phytoestrogens on sheep and cattle.

Authors:  N R Adams
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  15 in total

1.  Generalized Concentration Addition Model Predicts Glucocorticoid Activity Bioassay Responses to Environmentally Detected Receptor-Ligand Mixtures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Toxicokinetics and bioavailability of bisphenol AF following oral administration in rodents: A dose, species, and sex comparison.

Authors:  Suramya Waidyanatha; Sherry R Black; Kristin Aillon; Brad Collins; Purvi R Patel; Felicia Riordan; Vicki Sutherland; Veronica Godfrey Robinson; Reshan Fernando; Timothy R Fennell
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Differential activity of BPA, BPAF and BPC on zebrafish estrogen receptors in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Caroline Pinto; Ruixin Hao; Marina Grimaldi; Savini Thrikawala; Abdelhay Boulahtouf; Selim Aït-Aïssa; François Brion; Jan-Åke Gustafsson; Patrick Balaguer; Maria Bondesson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  In vitro activity of a panel of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), fatty acids, and pharmaceuticals in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha, PPAR gamma, and estrogen receptor assays.

Authors:  Nicola Evans; Justin M Conley; Mary Cardon; Phillip Hartig; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  A Conflicted Tale of Two Novel AR Antagonists In Vitro and In Vivo: Pyrifluquinazon Versus Bisphenol C.

Authors:  Leon Earl Gray; Johnathan R Furr; Justin M Conley; Christy S Lambright; Nicola Evans; Mary C Cardon; Vickie S Wilson; Paul M Foster; Phillip C Hartig
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Characterization of Estrogenic and Androgenic Activities for Bisphenol A-like Chemicals (BPs): In Vitro Estrogen and Androgen Receptors Transcriptional Activation, Gene Regulation, and Binding Profiles.

Authors:  Katherine E Pelch; Yin Li; Lalith Perera; Kristina A Thayer; Kenneth S Korach
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Screening Estrogen Receptor Modulators in a Paper-Based Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Nathan A Whitman; Zhi-Wei Lin; Thomas J DiProspero; Julie C McIntosh; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Endocrine disruptors of sex hormone activities.

Authors:  L Varticovski; D A Stavreva; A McGowan; R Raziuddin; G L Hager
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  In vitro effects-based method and water quality screening model for use in pre- and post-distribution treated waters.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; Nicola Evans; Luke R Iwanowicz; Joshua M Allen; Elizabeth Wagner; Katherine Bokenkamp; Susan D Richardson; Michael J Plewa; Paul M Bradley; Kristin M Romanok; Dana W Kolpin; Justin M Conley; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  De Facto Water Reuse: Bioassay suite approach delivers depth and breadth in endocrine active compound detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Medlock Kakaley; Brett R Blackwell; Mary C Cardon; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; David J Feifarek; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Dana W Kolpin; Marc A Mills; Laura Rosenblum; Daniel L Villeneuve; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.