BACKGROUND: A phase I, dose-escalation study of AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumors, with an expanded cohort in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) to assess preliminary activity. METHODS: In the dose escalation portion, increasing doses of AT-101 were administered orally BID on days 1-3 along with cisplatin on day 1 and etoposide on days 1-3 of a 21 day cycle. At the RP2D, an additional 7 patients with untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort, and 7 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled in the expanded cohort. The MTD/RP2D was established at AT-101 40 mg BID days 1-3 with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21 day cycle with pegfilgrastim support. Two DLTs of neutropenic fever were seen at dose level 1. After the addition of pegfilgrastim, no additional DLTs were observed. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included: diarrhea, increased AST, neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. No apparent PK interactions were observed between the agents. Preliminary activity was observed with PRs in patients with ES-SCLC, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor, esophageal cancer and NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide is well tolerated with growth factor support. Anti-tumor activity was observed in a variety of cancers including ES-SCLC, supporting further investigation with BH-3 mimetics in combination with standard chemotherapy for ES-SCLC.
BACKGROUND: A phase I, dose-escalation study of AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumors, with an expanded cohort in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) to assess preliminary activity. METHODS: In the dose escalation portion, increasing doses of AT-101 were administered orally BID on days 1-3 along with cisplatin on day 1 and etoposide on days 1-3 of a 21 day cycle. At the RP2D, an additional 7 patients with untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort, and 7 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled in the expanded cohort. The MTD/RP2D was established atAT-101 40 mg BID days 1-3 with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21 day cycle with pegfilgrastim support. Two DLTs of neutropenic fever were seen at dose level 1. After the addition of pegfilgrastim, no additional DLTs were observed. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included: diarrhea, increased AST, neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. No apparent PK interactions were observed between the agents. Preliminary activity was observed with PRs in patients with ES-SCLC, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor, esophageal cancer and NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS:AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide is well tolerated with growth factor support. Anti-tumor activity was observed in a variety of cancers including ES-SCLC, supporting further investigation with BH-3 mimetics in combination with standard chemotherapy for ES-SCLC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stein Sundstrøm; Roy M Bremnes; Stein Kaasa; Ulf Aasebø; Reidulv Hatlevoll; Ragnar Dahle; Nils Boye; Mari Wang; Tor Vigander; Jan Vilsvik; Eva Skovlund; Einar Hannisdal; Steinar Aamdal Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Sonpavde; V Matveev; J M Burke; J R Caton; M T Fleming; T E Hutson; M D Galsky; W R Berry; P Karlov; J T Holmlund; B A Wood; M Brookes; L Leopold Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A Leri; P P Claudio; Q Li; X Wang; K Reiss; S Wang; A Malhotra; J Kajstura; P Anversa Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Miranda Verschraagen; Epie Boven; Rita Ruijter; Kasper van der Born; Johannes Berkhof; Frederick H Hausheer; Wim J F van der Vijgh Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Glenn Liu; W Kevin Kelly; George Wilding; Lance Leopold; Kimberli Brill; Bradley Somer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mark N Stein; Maha Hussain; Walter M Stadler; Glenn Liu; Irina V Tereshchenko; Susan Goodin; Chandrika Jeyamohan; Howard L Kaufman; Janice Mehnert; Robert S DiPaola Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Robert Matthew Kottmann; Emma Trawick; Jennifer L Judge; Lindsay A Wahl; Amali P Epa; Kristina M Owens; Thomas H Thatcher; Richard P Phipps; Patricia J Sime Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Paul L Swiecicki; Emily Bellile; Assuntina G Sacco; Alexander T Pearson; Jeremy M G Taylor; Trachette L Jackson; Douglas B Chepeha; Matthew E Spector; Andrew Shuman; Kelly Malloy; Jeffrey Moyer; Erin McKean; Scott McLean; Ammar Sukari; Gregory T Wolf; Avraham Eisbruch; Mark Prince; Carol Bradford; Thomas E Carey; Shaomeng Wang; Jacques E Nör; Francis P Worden Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Xia Wen; Brian Buckley; Elizabeth McCandlish; Michael J Goedken; Samira Syed; Ryan Pelis; José E Manautou; Lauren M Aleksunes Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 4.307