Vivian Adamski1, Christina Schmitt2, Florian Ceynowa3, Rainer Adelung3, Ralph Lucius2, Michael Synowitz1, Kirsten Hattermann2, Janka Held-Feindt4. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str.3, Building 41, 24105, Kiel, Germany. 2. Department of Anatomy, University of Kiel, 24118, Kiel, Germany. 3. Institute for Materials Science, University of Kiel, 24143, Kiel, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein UKSH, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str.3, Building 41, 24105, Kiel, Germany. Janka.Held-Feindt@uksh.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a poorly curable disease due to its heterogeneity that enables single cells to survive treatment regimen and initiate tumor regrowth. Although some progress in therapy has been achieved in the last years, the efficient treatment of GBMs is still a clinical challenge. Besides the standard therapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ), quinoline-based antimalarial drugs such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and BH3 mimetics such as AT101 were considered as possible drugs for GBM therapy. METHODS: We investigated the effects of sequentially applied single and combined TMZ, HCQ and AT101 treatments in a long-term stimulation GBM in vitro model. We performed all investigations in parallel in human astrocytes and two differentially TMZ-responsive human GBM cell lines and adjusted used drug concentrations to known liquor/plasma concentrations in patients. We determined amounts of dead cells and still remaining growth rates and depicted our results in a heatmap-like summary to visualize which sequential long-term treatment schedule seemed to be most promising. RESULTS: We showed that sequential stimulations yielded higher cytotoxicity and better tumor growth control in comparison to single TMZ treatment. This was especially the case for the sequences TMZ/HCQ and TMZ + AT101/AT101 which was as effective as the non-sequential combination TMZ + AT101. Importantly, those affected both less and more TMZ-responsive glioma cell lines, whilst being less harmful for astrocytes in comparison to single TMZ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with mechanistically different acting drugs might be an option to reduce side effects in long-term treatment, for example in local administration approaches.
PURPOSE:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a poorly curable disease due to its heterogeneity that enables single cells to survive treatment regimen and initiate tumor regrowth. Although some progress in therapy has been achieved in the last years, the efficient treatment of GBMs is still a clinical challenge. Besides the standard therapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ), quinoline-based antimalarial drugs such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and BH3 mimetics such as AT101 were considered as possible drugs for GBM therapy. METHODS: We investigated the effects of sequentially applied single and combined TMZ, HCQ and AT101 treatments in a long-term stimulation GBM in vitro model. We performed all investigations in parallel in human astrocytes and two differentially TMZ-responsive human GBM cell lines and adjusted used drug concentrations to known liquor/plasma concentrations in patients. We determined amounts of dead cells and still remaining growth rates and depicted our results in a heatmap-like summary to visualize which sequential long-term treatment schedule seemed to be most promising. RESULTS: We showed that sequential stimulations yielded higher cytotoxicity and better tumor growth control in comparison to single TMZ treatment. This was especially the case for the sequences TMZ/HCQ and TMZ + AT101/AT101 which was as effective as the non-sequential combination TMZ + AT101. Importantly, those affected both less and more TMZ-responsive glioma cell lines, whilst being less harmful for astrocytes in comparison to single TMZ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with mechanistically different acting drugs might be an option to reduce side effects in long-term treatment, for example in local administration approaches.
Authors: Ángelo S T Arévalo; José I Erices; Daniel A Uribe; Jake Howden; Ignacio Niechi; Sebastián Muñoz; Rody S Martín; Claudia A Q Monrás Journal: Curr Med Chem Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: G Sonpavde; V Matveev; J M Burke; J R Caton; M T Fleming; T E Hutson; M D Galsky; W R Berry; P Karlov; J T Holmlund; B A Wood; M Brookes; L Leopold Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Myrna R Rosenfeld; Xiaobu Ye; Jeffrey G Supko; Serena Desideri; Stuart A Grossman; Steven Brem; Tom Mikkelson; Daniel Wang; Yunyoung C Chang; Janice Hu; Quentin McAfee; Joy Fisher; Andrea B Troxel; Shengfu Piao; Daniel F Heitjan; Kay-See Tan; Laura Pontiggia; Peter J O'Dwyer; Lisa E Davis; Ravi K Amaravadi Journal: Autophagy Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: Lucy Brazil; Angela L Swampillai; Ka Man Mak; Darren Edwards; Pavlina Mesiri; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Richard Shaffer; Joanne Lewis; Colin Watts; Sarah Jeffries; Pinelopi Gkogkou; Anthony J Chalmers; Naomi L Fersht; Allan Hackshaw; Susan C Short Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2020-04-27
Authors: Olga Renner; Mascha Mayer; Christian Leischner; Markus Burkard; Alexander Berger; Ulrich M Lauer; Sascha Venturelli; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-01-26
Authors: Christina Schmitt; Anna Lechanteur; François Cossais; Coralie Bellefroid; Philipp Arnold; Ralph Lucius; Janka Held-Feindt; Geraldine Piel; Kirsten Hattermann Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2020-05-25
Authors: Dorota K Flak; Vivian Adamski; Grzegorz Nowaczyk; Kosma Szutkowski; Michael Synowitz; Stefan Jurga; Janka Held-Feindt Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2020-10-05
Authors: Hee Yeon Kim; Byung Il Lee; Ji Hoon Jeon; Dong Keon Kim; Seok-Gu Kang; Jin-Kyoung Shim; Soo Youl Kim; Sang Won Kang; Hyonchol Jang Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2019-10-10
Authors: Deniz Caylioglu; Rieke Johanna Meyer; Dana Hellmold; Carolin Kubelt; Michael Synowitz; Janka Held-Feindt Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 5.923