Literature DB >> 23856355

One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center.

Luigi Bonavina1, Greta Saino, Davide Bona, Andrea Sironi, Veronica Lazzari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to evaluate our clinical experience during a 6-year period with an implantable device that augments the lower esophageal sphincter for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The device uses magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) to strengthen the antireflux barrier. STUDY
DESIGN: In a single-center, prospective case series, 100 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic MSA for GERD between March 2007 and February 2012. Clinical outcomes for each patient were tracked post implantation and compared with presurgical data for esophageal pH measurements, symptom scores, and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use.
RESULTS: Median implant duration was 3 years (range 378 days to 6 years). Median total acid exposure time was reduced from 8.0% before implant to 3.2% post implant (p < 0.001). The median GERD Health Related Quality of Life score at baseline was 16 on PPIs and 24 off PPIs and improved to a score of 2 (p < 0.001). Freedom from daily dependence on PPIs was achieved in 85% of patients. There have been no long-term complications, such as device migrations or erosions. Three patients had the device laparoscopically removed for persistent GERD, odynophagia, or dysphagia, with subsequent resolution of symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic sphincter augmentation for GERD in clinical practice provides safe and long-term reduction of esophageal acid exposure, substantial symptom improvement, and elimination of daily PPI use. For candidates of antireflux surgery who have been carefully evaluated before surgery to confirm indication for MSA, MSA has become a standard treatment at our institution because control of reflux symptoms and pH normalization can be achieved with minimal side effects and preservation of gastric anatomy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEJ; GERD; HRQL; Health Related Quality of Life; LES; MSA; PPI; gastroesophageal junction; gastroesophageal reflux disease; lower esophageal sphincter; magnetic sphincter augmentation; proton pump inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23856355     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  40 in total

1.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective option for refractory duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux following Billroth II gastrectomy.

Authors:  Matteo Melloni; Veronica Lazzari; Emanuele Asti; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-08

3.  Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  John P Kuckelman; Cody J Phillips; Michael J Derickson; Byron J Faler; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Veronica Lazzari; Andrea Sironi; Matteo Porta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-18

5.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah J Switzer; Jerry Dang; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Christopher de Gara; Daniel W Birch; Clarence Wong; Matthew M Hutter; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Update in procedural therapy for GERD--magnetic sphincter augmentation, endoscopic transoral incisionless fundoplication vs laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Michael X Min; Robert A Ganz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-02

Review 9.  Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hongke Zhang; Dinghui Dong; Zhengwen Liu; Shuixiang He; Liangshuo Hu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Review of antireflux procedures for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Hillman; R Yadlapati; M Whitsett; A J Thuluvath; M A Berendsen; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.