Literature DB >> 23856036

Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.

Antonio Galfano1, Dario Di Trapani, Francesco Sozzi, Elena Strada, Giovanni Petralia, Manuela Bramerio, Assunta Ascione, Marcello Gambacorta, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the main surgical option for localized prostate cancer. We recently developed a new approach for RARP, passing through the pouch of Douglas and avoiding all the Retzius structures involved in continence and potency preservation.
OBJECTIVE: To report the functional and oncologic results of our first 200 patients operated on using this new approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective, noncontrolled case series including the first 200 consecutive patients undergoing this kind of surgery (January the 1st, 2010 to December the 31st, 2011). SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Retzius-sparing RARP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All perioperative, oncologic, and functional data were prospectively recorded. Potency was defined as an International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire score >17; continence was defined as use of no pad or of one safety liner. Oncologic results were reported as positive surgical margins (PSM) and 1-yr biochemical disease-free survival (1y-bDFS). Recurrence was defined as a repeated prostate-specific antigen >0.2 ng/ml. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. The first 100 patients (group 1) were compared with the second 100 (group 2) to evaluate the learning curve effects. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 65 yr. Comparing the two groups, transfusions were needed in 8% versus 4% of cases in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.02). There was one Clavien-Dindo grade 3b in group 1 versus one grade 3a complication in group 2. In patients with pT2 disease, PSMs were recorded in 22.4% of those in group 1 versus 10.1% in group 2 (p=0.045). 1y-bDFS was 89% in group 1 versus 92% in group 2. For groups 1 and 2, respectively, immediate continence was reached in 92% versus 90% of patients, and the 1-yr continence rate was 96% versus 96%. Considering the 77 potent patients aged <65 yr who underwent bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing surgery, 40.4% of those in group 1 versus 40% of those in group 2 reached their first intercourse within 1 mo; at 1 yr of follow-up, these figures had increased to 81% versus 71%, respectively (p=0.162). The main limitation of this study is its noncontrolled nature.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated Retzius-sparing RARP to be oncologically safe and to result in high early continence and potency rates. Long-term, prospective, comparative, and possibly randomized studies are needed.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Douglas pouch; Learning curve; Prostate cancer; RARP; Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23856036     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  46 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: Oncological vs functional outcomes for RARP--finding a balance.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Retzius space reconstruction following transperitoneal laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it have any added value?

Authors:  Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Zohar Dotan; Jacob Ramon; Dorit E Zilberman
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Should post-kidney transplant patients with localized prostate cancer be undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Ahmed A Aboumohamed; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in transplant patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Burkhard Beyer; Philipp Mandel; Uwe Michl; Raisa S Pompe; Valia Veleva; Thomas Steuber; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy effective in early continence? A single-center experience of the first 50 patients.

Authors:  Kayhan Yılmaz; Çağatay Özsoy; Mahmut Taha Ölçücü; Eren Erdi Aksaray; Yahya Okuducu; Mutlu Ateş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20

7.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Luca Topazio; Michele De Angelis; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Filippo Annino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Is this the ultimate solution to fight erectile dysfunction post radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Silvia Secco; Aldo Bocciardi; Mattia Piccinelli; Antonio Galfano
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

9.  Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Alhathal; Mathieu Latour; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Anatomical Retzius-space preservation is associated with lower incidence of postoperative inguinal hernia development after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  K D Chang; A Abdel Raheem; G D R Santok; L H C Kim; T G H Lum; S H Lee; W S Ham; Y D Choi; K H Rha
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.