Literature DB >> 29181778

Retzius space reconstruction following transperitoneal laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it have any added value?

Yasmin Abu-Ghanem1,2, Zohar Dotan3,4, Jacob Ramon3,4, Dorit E Zilberman3,4.   

Abstract

Retzius space sparing (RSS) during laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) has been offered as an approach that reduces perioperative complications and enables faster gaining of full urinary continence due to bladder anatomy preservation. Retro and transperitoneal techniques have been proposed, whereby RSS has been implemented. We sought to explore whether Retzius space reconstruction (RSR) following transperitoneal RALP will be an advantageous step as well. A prospective registry database of 102 consecutive transperitoneal RALP cases performed by a single surgeon was reviewed. The Retzius space had been opened by dissecting the bladder away from the anterior abdominal wall to the level of both internal rings. In the last 51 cases (RSR group), the peritoneal layer had been sutured back, thus repositioning the bladder back to the anterior abdominal wall and reconstructing the Retzius space. Perioperative factors were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Demographic and perioperative data did not differ between the two groups. RSR group demonstrated shorter length of stay (LOS) compared with the control group (p = 0.01), as well as faster urinary continence recovery (i.e., 0 pads) (p = 0.01). Moreover, lower numbers of Clavien-Dindo class 3 complications and 12 mm port-site hernias (p = 0.03) were seen in the RSR group compared with the control group. RSR following transperitoneal RALP is a simple and efficient step that potentially reduces early and late post-operative complications, shortens LOS and accelerates full urinary continence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continence; Radical prostatectomy; Retzius; Robot; Transperitoneal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181778     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0768-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  15 in total

1.  Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rafael F Coelho; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial.

Authors:  Xavier Hurtes; Morgan Rouprêt; Christophe Vaessen; Helder Pereira; Benjamin Faivre d'Arcier; Luc Cormier; Franck Bruyère
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men.

Authors:  G Pasticier; J B Rietbergen; B Guillonneau; G Fromont; M Menon; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Galfano; Assunta Ascione; Salvatore Grimaldi; Giovanni Petralia; Elena Strada; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Perioperative and short-term outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy stratified by gland size.

Authors:  Glen D R Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Lawrence H C Kim; Kidon Chang; Trenton G H Lum; Byung H Chung; Young D Choi; Koon H Rha
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Incisional hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy-predisposing factors in a prospective cohort of 250 cases.

Authors:  Andrew Fuller; Alfonso Fernandez; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James Peabody
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Marcos P Freire; Aaron C Weinberg; Yin Lei; Jane R Soukup; Stuart R Lipsitz; Sandip M Prasad; Fernando Korkes; Tiffany Lin; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Douglas Skarecky; Blanca Morales; Kathryn Osann; Louis Eichel; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  7 in total

1.  Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Nina Natascha Harke; Christian Wagner; Nikolaos Liakos; Katarina Urbanova; Mustapha Addali; Boris A Hadaschik; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy effective in early continence? A single-center experience of the first 50 patients.

Authors:  Kayhan Yılmaz; Çağatay Özsoy; Mahmut Taha Ölçücü; Eren Erdi Aksaray; Yahya Okuducu; Mutlu Ateş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 3.  Comparison of Retzius-sparing and conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding continence and sexual function: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; Jindong Zhang; Zongke Yang; Qingyuan Liu; Weiyang Zhang; Zizhen Qing; Delin Wang
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Hae Do Jung; Do Kyung Kim; Min Ho Lee; Sin Woo Lee; Sunghyun Paick; Joo Yong Lee; Seung Hyun Jeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  The impact of transition from conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multivariate analysis.

Authors:  T A Kishore; Milka James Kuriakose; Vishnu Raveendran; M K Ramaprasad
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 6.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care.

Authors:  Isaac Palma-Zamora; Firas Abdollah; Craig Rogers; Wooju Jeong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Li Jiang; Gao-Feng Zheng; Ze-Peng Jiang; Xie-Lai Zhou; Jin Zhou; Chun-Hua Ye; Kang-Er Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.