Literature DB >> 2385202

A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled x-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine.

B J Conway1, J E Duff, T R Fewell, R J Jennings, L N Rothenberg, R C Fleischman.   

Abstract

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations requires diagnostic radiology facilities to known the approximate amount of radiation received by an average patient during radiographic examinations at the facility. Automatic exposure controlled (AEC) techniques are used for many of these exams, and a standard patient-equivalent phantom is necessary when estimating patient exposure on such systems. This is of particular importance if exposures are to be compared among AEC systems with different entrance x-ray spectra. We have developed a phantom, LucA1 Abdomen, to facilitate determining the average patient exposure from AEC anteroposterior (AP) abdomen and lumbo-sacral (LS) spine radiography. The phantom is relatively lightweight, transportable, sturdy, and made of readily available inexpensive materials (Lucite and aluminum). It accurately simulates the primary and scatter transmission through the soft tissue and L-4 spinal regions of a patient-equivalent anthropomorphic phantom for x-ray spectra typically used in abdomen/LS spine radiography. A clinical evaluation to verify the patient-equivalence of three commercial anthropomorphic phantoms (Humanoid, Rando, 3-M) and two acrylic/aluminum phantoms (ANSI and LucA1 Abdomen) has been conducted. The design and development of the LucA1 Abdomen phantom and the evaluation of all phantoms is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2385202     DOI: 10.1118/1.596483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  New head equivalent phantom for task and image performance evaluation representative for neurovascular procedures occurring in the Circle of Willis.

Authors:  Ciprian N Ionita; Brendan Loughran; Amit Jain; S N Swetadri Vasan; Daniel R Bednarek; Elad Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Kenneth V Snyder; L N Hopkins; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

2.  Consequences of modern anthropometric dimensions for radiographic techniques and patient radiation exposures.

Authors:  Chintan Shah; A Kyle Jones; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Gain and offset calibration reduces variation in exposure-dependent SNR among systems with identical digital flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Charles E Willis; Yevgeniy Y Vinogradskiy; Brad K Lofton; R Allen White
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.

Authors:  Shannon Fritz; A Kyle Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27

5.  Detector system comparison using relative CNR for specific imaging tasks related to neuro-endovascular image-guided interventions (neuro-EIGIs).

Authors:  Brendan Loughran; S N Swetadri Vasan; Vivek Singh; Ciprian N Ionita; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Comparison of six phantoms for entrance skin dose evaluation in 11 standard X-ray examinations.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Laura Pagan; Carlo Bergamini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Kevin A Casciotta; Yusuf E Erdi; Lawrence N Rothenberg
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.