Literature DB >> 23851801

Laypersons' ratings of appearance in children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis.

Brent R Collett1, Kristen E Gray, Kathleen A Kapp-Simon, Craig Birgfeld, Michael Cunningham, Jenna Rudo-Stern, Danielle Ung, Lauren Buono, Matthew L Speltz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) results in head shape anomalies that likely affect social perceptions of appearance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate laypersons' ratings of attractiveness in children with and without SSC. Among cases, we also examined differences by suture fused and age at surgery.
METHODS: We collected photographs of 196 children with SSC and 186 children without SSC as infants (before surgery, for cases) and at ages 18 and 36 months. Photographs were rated by 8 raters, who were blinded to the population being studied. We used linear regression to compare appearance ratings for the 2 groups at each visit and to evaluate changes over time. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between age at surgery and appearance ratings.
RESULTS: Children with SSC received lower appearance ratings than unaffected controls at each visit (all P < 0.001). Appearance ratings decreased over time, with a similar trajectory for children with and without SSC. Among cases, those with unicoronal and lambdoid synostosis had the lowest ratings and those with sagittal synostosis had the highest. Age at surgery was inversely associated with appearance ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with SSC received lower appearance ratings than unaffected controls, with minimal change after surgery. Better outcomes were associated with earlier surgery. These findings do not indicate that children with SSC failed to benefit from surgery, as without surgical intervention, asymmetrical head shape would likely have worsened over time. However, our data suggest that appearance does not fully "normalize."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23851801      PMCID: PMC3758118          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182997885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  18 in total

1.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

Authors:  J H Langlois; L Kalakanis; A J Rubenstein; A Larson; M Hallam; M Smoot
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Clinical outcome of the modified pi-plasty procedure for sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  J Guimarães-Ferreira; F Gewalli; L David; R Olsson; H Friede; C G Lauritzen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Subtotal cranial vault remodelling in anterior sagittal suture closure: impact of age on surgical outcome.

Authors:  M Engel; J Hoffmann; J Mühling; G Castrillón-Oberndorfer; R Seeberger; C Freudlsperger
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  A population-based study of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  L R French; I T Jackson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Parameters of care for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Joseph G McCarthy; Stephen M Warren; Joseph Bernstein; Whitney Burnett; Michael L Cunningham; Jane C Edmond; Alvaro A Figueroa; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Brian I Labow; Sally J Peterson-Falzone; Mark R Proctor; Marcie S Rubin; Raymond W Sze; Terrance A Yemen
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-08-17

6.  Adults' responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness.

Authors:  J M Ritter; R J Casey; J H Langlois
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1991-02

7.  Predictive value of minor anomalies. I. Association with major malformations.

Authors:  K A Leppig; M M Werler; C I Cann; C A Cook; L B Holmes
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  New severity indices for quantifying single-suture metopic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Salvador Ruiz-Correa; Jacqueline R Starr; H Jill Lin; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Raymond W Sze; Richard G Ellenbogen; Matthew L Speltz; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Cranial base changes following surgical treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  J L Marsh; M W Vannier
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1986-12

10.  Outcome analysis of our first 75 spring-assisted surgeries for scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Lisa R David; Christina M Plikaitis; Daniel Couture; Steven S Glazier; Louis C Argenta
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  3 in total

1.  Morphological and surgical results in sagittal synostosis: early craniectomy versus later cranioplasty.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Pierre Guerreschi; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Alexis Wolber
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Cranial growth in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared with normal growth in the first 6 months of age.

Authors:  Ezgi Mercan; Richard A Hopper; A Murat Maga
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.