Literature DB >> 11358093

Clinical outcome of the modified pi-plasty procedure for sagittal synostosis.

J Guimarães-Ferreira1, F Gewalli, L David, R Olsson, H Friede, C G Lauritzen.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the modified pi-plasty procedure for the treatment of sagittal synostosis, assessing the issues of safety, complications, morphological outcome, and degree of parental satisfaction. A retrospective evaluation of 110 patients with nonsyndromal single suture sagittal synostosis operated on with the modified pi-plasty procedure was undertaken. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at ages 3 and 5 years in three standardized projections. The Cephalic Index and the Axial Width Ratio were determined and used as objective outcome measures. An evaluation of the radiographic digital markings was carried out using a Beaten Copper Score. A parental questionnaire was used to obtain a subjective esthetical outcome assessment. The patient population consisted of 76% boys and 24% girls with a 20% incidence of a positive familial history of craniosynostosis. The mean age at surgery was 7.73 months. Morbidity from the procedure was minimal and there were no mortalities. The Cephalic Index changed from a mean preoperative value of 65% to a postoperative mean value of 72% (P = 0.00004). The mean Axial Width Ratio changed from a preoperative 80% to 72% at the 3-year evaluation (P = 0.00029). The Beaten Copper score changed from a mean preoperative value of 2.35 to 5.42 postoperatively at 3 years (P = 0.00001). The response rate to the questionnaire was 86%, and there were significant postoperative improvements in all studied aspects of the skull shape. The modified pi-plasty is a safe technique, and it induces significant objective changes in skull morphology toward normality. It also yields a high degree of parental satisfaction with regard to aesthetic outcome, as evaluated by a written questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11358093     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200105000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Safety of Open Cranial Vault Surgery for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Case for the Multidisciplinary Team.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Lynette Dufton; Heather Naumann; Richard A Hopper; Joseph S Gruss; Charles M Haberkern; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Reduction cranioplasty for macrocephaly with long-standing hydrocephalus and non-fused fontanelle in Chiari malformation type I.

Authors:  Jong-Il Choi; Eun Sang Dhong; Dong-Jun Lim; Sang-Dae Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Laypersons' ratings of appearance in children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Brent R Collett; Kristen E Gray; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Craig Birgfeld; Michael Cunningham; Jenna Rudo-Stern; Danielle Ung; Lauren Buono; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Cephalic index correlates poorly with intracranial volume in non-syndromic scaphocephalic patients.

Authors:  Junnu Leikola; Virve Koljonen; Arja Heliövaara; Jyri Hukki; Mika Koivikko
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Significance of beaten copper appearance on skull radiographs in children with isolated sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Deepak Agrawal; Paul Steinbok; D Douglas Cochrane
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Maternal reports of satisfaction with care and outcomes for children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Donna L Wong-Gibbons; Vijaya Kancherla; Paul A Romitti; Margaret C Tyler; Peter C Damiano; Charlotte M Druschel; James M Robbins; Sara Kizelnik-Freilich; Whitney Burnett
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Modification of the Melbourne Method for Total Calvarial Vault Remodeling.

Authors:  Christopher D Hughes; Kathryn V Isaac; Paul F Hwang; Ingrid Ganske; Mark R Proctor; John G Meara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-09

8.  Objective three-dimensional analysis of cranial morphology.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Marcus; Leahthan F Domeshek; Rajesh Das; Sean Marshall; Roger Nightingale; Tracey H Stokes; Srinivasan Mukundan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-04-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.