Literature DB >> 23851748

Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniosynostosis surgery.

Mitchel Seruya1, Daniel E Borsuk, Saami Khalifian, Benjamin S Carson, Nicholas M Dalesio, Amir H Dorafshar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable operative time is expended during the planning, shaping, and reconfiguring of the cranial vault in the pursuit of symmetry during open craniosynostosis surgery. Computer-aided design and manufacturing has recently been implemented in orthognathic surgery and complex craniomaxillofacial reconstruction as a means of optimizing operative accuracy and efficiency. In this report, we highlight our growing experience with this promising modality for the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution of cranial vault remodeling in patients with both simple and complex forms of craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Computer-assisted surgical planning begins with acquisition of high-resolution computed tomography scans of the craniofacial skeleton. An Internet-based teleconference is then held between the craniofacial and biomedical engineering teams and provides a forum for virtual manipulation of the patient's preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography with real-time changes and feedback. Through virtual surgical planning, osteotomies are designed and calvarial bones reconfigured to achieve the desired cranial vault appearance. Cutting and positioning guides are manufactured to transform the virtual plan into a reality.
RESULTS: From February to March 2012, 4 children (aged 9 months to 6 years) with craniosynostosis underwent computer-assisted simulation and surgery. Diagnoses included metopic, unicoronal (n = 2), and multisutural synostoses (sagittal and left unicoronal). Open craniofacial repairs were performed as virtually planned, including front o-orbital remodeling, fronto-orbital advancement, and anterior two-thirds calvarial remodeling, respectively. Cutting and final positioning guides demonstrated excellent fidelity and ease of use.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided design and manufacturing may offer a platform for optimizing operative efficiency, precision, and accuracy in craniosynostosis surgery, while accelerating the learning curve for future trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23851748     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828b7021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  15 in total

1.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note.

Authors:  Andrew J Kobets; Adam Ammar; Jonathan Nakhla; Aleka Scoco; Rani Nasser; James T Goodrich; Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing to localize dural venous sinuses during reconstructive surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Adela Wu; Alexandra Macmillan; Leila Musavi; Regina Cho; Joseph Lopez; George I Jallo; Amir H Dorafshar; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  The Use of Virtual Surgical Planning in Total Facial Skeletal Reconstruction of Treacher Collins Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yifan Guo; Joseph Lopez; Robin Yang; Alexandra Macmillan; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Indications for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Congenital Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark Fisher; Miguel Medina; Branko Bojovic; Edward Ahn; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-06-29

8.  Assessment of a Novel Standardized Training System for Mandibular Contour Surgeries.

Authors:  Jia Qiao; Jia Xu; Xi Fu; Feng Niu; Lai Gui; Sabine Girod; Chung-Kwan Yen; Jianfeng Liu; Ying Chen; Jeffrey W Kwong; Cai Wang; Huijun Zhang; Shixing Xu; Hamzah Alkofahi; Xiaoyan Mao
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

10.  On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Authors:  Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.