Literature DB >> 23851579

Predicting life expectancy for community-dwelling older adults from Medicare claims data.

Alai Tan, Yong-Fang Kuo, James S Goodwin.   

Abstract

Estimates of life expectancy are useful in assessing whether different prevention strategies are appropriate in different populations. We developed sex-specific Cox proportional-hazard models that use Medicare claims data to predict life expectancy and risk of death at up to 10 years for older adults. We identified a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries 66-90 years of age from the 5% Medicare claims data in 2000 (n = 1,137,311) and tracked each subject's vital status until December 31, 2009. Subjects were split randomly into training and validation samples. Models were developed from the training sample and validated by comparison of predicted to actual survival in the validation sample. The C statistics for the models including predictors of age and Elixhauser comorbidities were 0.76-0.79 for men and women for prediction of death at the 1-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year follow-up periods. More than 80% of subjects with <25% risk of death at 5, 7, and 10 years survived longer than the chosen cutoff years. More than 80% of subjects with ≥75% risk of death at 5, 7, and 10 years died by those cutoff years. The models overestimated the risk of death at 1 year for the high-risk groups. Sex-specific models that use age and Elixhauser comorbidities can accurately predict patient life expectancy and risk of death at 5-10 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; aged; comorbidity; life expectancy; mortality; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23851579      PMCID: PMC3775541          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  43 in total

1.  Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Arlene F Brown; Carol M Mangione; Debra Saliba; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth G McFarland; Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Perry J Pickhardt; C Daniel Johnson; Seth N Glick; Durado Brooks; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.

Authors:  Whitney M Randolph; James S Goodwin; Jonathan D Mahnken; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations.

Authors:  G J Stukenborg; D P Wagner; A F Connors
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  The sex differential in morbidity, mortality, and lifestyle.

Authors:  D L Wingard
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Judith A Long; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Sex differences in illness incidence, prognosis and mortality: issues and evidence.

Authors:  I Waldron
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.

Authors:  Whitney M Randolph; Jonathan D Mahnken; James S Goodwin; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  23 in total

1.  Prospective Identification of Patients at Risk for Unwarranted Variation in Treatment.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Evan Bollens-Lund; Kenneth E Covinsky; Jonathan S Skinner; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 2.  A systematic literature review of life expectancy prediction tools for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Kent; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Sex disparities in health and health care utilization after Parkinson diagnosis: Rethinking PD associated disability.

Authors:  Michelle E Fullard; Dylan P Thibault; Veronica Todaro; Susan Foster; Lori Katz; Robin Morgan; Drew S Kern; Jason M Schwalb; Enrique Urrea Mendoza; Nabila Dahodwala; Lisa Shulman; Allison W Willis
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.891

4.  Capsule Commentary on Goodwin et al., Receipt of Cancer Screening is a Predictor of Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.

Authors:  Supriya G Mohile; William Dale; Mark R Somerfield; Mara A Schonberg; Cynthia M Boyd; Peggy S Burhenn; Beverly Canin; Harvey Jay Cohen; Holly M Holmes; Judith O Hopkins; Michelle C Janelsins; Alok A Khorana; Heidi D Klepin; Stuart M Lichtman; Karen M Mustian; William P Tew; Arti Hurria
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Screening Mammography Outcomes: Risk of Breast Cancer and Mortality by Comorbidity Score and Age.

Authors:  Joshua Demb; Linn Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Ellen S O'Meara; Shailesh Advani; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Diana S M Buist; John T Schousboe; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Predicting Mortality up to 14 Years Among Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 65 and Older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Vicky Li; Edward R Marcantonio; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Comparing Prognostic Tools for Cancer Screening: Considerations for Clinical Practice and Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Amanda L Blackford; Nancy L Schoenborn; Cynthia M Boyd; Kimberly S Peairs; Eva H DuGoff
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Receipt of Cancer Screening Is a Predictor of Life Expectancy.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Kristin Sheffield; Shuang Li; Alai Tan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  The urgent need for contemporary clinical trials in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Seemant Chaturvedi; Marc Chimowitz; Robert D Brown; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.