Literature DB >> 23850170

Which patients benefit most from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer? An exploratory analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 randomised trial.

Hannah S van Meurs1, Parvin Tajik, Michel H P Hof, Ignace Vergote, Gemma G Kenter, Ben Willem J Mol, Marrije R Buist, Patrick M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether biomarkers consisting of baseline characteristics of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients can help in identifying subgroups of patients who would benefit more from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: We used data of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 55971 trial in which 670 patients were randomly assigned to primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival. Ten baseline clinical and pathological characteristics were selected as potential biomarkers. Using Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plots (STEPP), biomarkers with a statistically significant qualitative additive interaction with treatment were considered as potentially informative for treatment selection. We also combined selected biomarkers to form a multimarker treatment selection rule.
FINDINGS: The size of the largest metastatic tumour and clinical stage were significantly associated with the magnitude of the benefit from treatment, in terms of five-year survival (p for interaction: 0.008 and 0.016, respectively). Stage IIIC patients with metastatic tumours ⩽45 mm benefited more from primary surgery while stage IV patients with metastatic tumours >45 mm benefited more from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In stage IIIC patients with larger metastatic tumours and in stage IV patients with less extensive metastatic tumours both treatments were equally effective. We estimated that by selecting treatments for patients based on largest metastatic tumour and clinical stage, the potential five-year survival rate in the population of treated patients would be 27.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.9-33.0), 7.8% higher than if all were treated with primary surgery, and 5.6% higher if all were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
INTERPRETATION: Although survival was comparable after primary surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the overall group of patients with ovarian cancer in the EORTC 55971 trial, we found in this exploratory analysis that patients with stage IIIC and less extensive metastatic tumours had higher survival with primary surgery, while patients with stage IV disease and large metastatic tumours had higher survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients who did not meet these criteria, both treatment options led to comparable survival rates.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive interaction; Chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Surgery; Treatment selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850170     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  25 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: latest results and place in therapy.

Authors:  Seiya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Inga Steinberga; Kjell Jansson; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Optimal cytoreductive surgery for underlying ovarian cancer associated with deep venous thrombosis without placement of inferior vena cava filter: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Hongwei Shen; Jianhong Shang; Gang Niu; Jun Liu; Zeshan You; Shanyang He
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Alexi A Wright; Kari Bohlke; Deborah K Armstrong; Michael A Bookman; William A Cliby; Robert L Coleman; Don S Dizon; Joseph J Kash; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen N Moore; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jessica Oldham; Ritu Salani; Dee Sparacio; William P Tew; Ignace Vergote; Mitchell I Edelson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Alexi A Wright; Kari Bohlke; Deborah K Armstrong; Michael A Bookman; William A Cliby; Robert L Coleman; Don S Dizon; Joseph J Kash; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen N Moore; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jessica Oldham; Ritu Salani; Dee Sparacio; William P Tew; Ignace Vergote; Mitchell I Edelson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Primary or Interval Debulking? Five Categories of Patients in View of the Results of Randomized Trials and Tumor Biology: Primary Debulking Surgery and Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Amin P Makar; Claes G Tropé; Philippe Tummers; Hannelore Denys; Katrien Vandecasteele
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 7.  Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  David D Bowtell; Steffen Böhm; Ahmed A Ahmed; Paul-Joseph Aspuria; Robert C Bast; Valerie Beral; Jonathan S Berek; Michael J Birrer; Sarah Blagden; Michael A Bookman; James D Brenton; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Filipe Correia Martins; George Coukos; Ronny Drapkin; Richard Edmondson; Christina Fotopoulou; Hani Gabra; Jérôme Galon; Charlie Gourley; Valerie Heong; David G Huntsman; Marcin Iwanicki; Beth Y Karlan; Allyson Kaye; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Karen H Lu; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Steven A Narod; Brad H Nelson; Kenneth P Nephew; Paul Pharoah; Daniel J Powell; Pilar Ramos; Iris L Romero; Clare L Scott; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Frances R Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Overall Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs Primary Cytoreductive Surgery in Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed; Alexi Wright; Allison Gockley; Joel T Clemmer; John O Schorge; Marcela G Del Carmen; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Coleridge; Andrew Bryant; Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

10.  Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Coleridge; Andrew Bryant; Thomas J Lyons; Richard J Goodall; Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.