Literature DB >> 27009938

Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Primary or Interval Debulking? Five Categories of Patients in View of the Results of Randomized Trials and Tumor Biology: Primary Debulking Surgery and Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Amin P Makar1, Claes G Tropé2, Philippe Tummers3, Hannelore Denys4, Katrien Vandecasteele5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of stage III and IV advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) consists of primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy. Since the publication of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/National Cancer Institute of Canada trial, clinical practice has changed and many AOC patients are now treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The best option remains unclear. Ovarian cancer is a heterogenic disease. Should we use the diversity in biology of the tumor and patterns of tumor localization to better stratify patients between both approaches?
METHODS: This analysis was based on results of five phase III randomized controlled trials on PDS and IDS in AOC patients, three Cochrane reviews, and four meta-analyses.
RESULTS: There is still no evidence that NACT-IDS is superior to PDS. Clinical status, tumor biology, and chemosensitivity should be taken into account to individualize surgical approach. Nonserous (type 1) tumors with favorable prognosis are less chemosensitive, and omitting optimal PDS will lead to less favorable outcome. For patients with advanced serous ovarian cancer (type 2) associated with severe comorbidity or low performance status, NACT-IDS is the preferred option.
CONCLUSION: We propose stratifying AOC patients into five categories according to patterns of tumor spread (reflecting the biologic behavior), response to chemotherapy, and prognosis to make a more rational decision between PDS and NACT-IDS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Trial results regarding effect and timing of debulking surgery on survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer have been inconsistent and hence difficult to interpret. This review examines all randomized trials on primary and interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, including the results of the newly published CHORUS (chemotherapy or upfront surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer) trial. On the basis of findings presented in this review and in view of recent molecular data on the heterogeneity of ovarian tumors, we propose prognostic categorization for patients with advanced ovarian cancer to better distinguish those who would optimally benefit from primary debulking from those who would better benefit from interval debulking following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categories; Debulking; Ovarian cancer, type 1 and 2; Randomized trials; Stage III–IV

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009938      PMCID: PMC4912357          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  66 in total

Review 1.  Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Elattar; Andrew Bryant; Brett A Winter-Roach; Mohamed Hatem; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

2.  Modified posterior exenteration for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S M Eisenkop; R H Nalick; N N Teng
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Impact of National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Centers on ovarian cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Belinda Campos; Leo R Chavez; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan A Ledermann; Daniela Luvero; Aaron Shafer; Dennis O'Connor; Giorgia Mangili; Michael Friedlander; Jacobus Pfisterer; Mansoor R Mirza; Jae-Weon Kim; Jerome Alexandre; Amit Oza; Jubilee Brown
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Serum CA 125 level allows early identification of nonresponders during induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  A P Makar; G B Kristensen; O P Børmer; C G Tropé
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Impact of age on outcome in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated within a prospectively randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR).

Authors:  Pauline Wimberger; Nils Lehmann; Rainer Kimmig; Alexander Burges; Werner Meier; Berit Hoppenau; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Comparison between serous and non-serous ovarian cancer as a prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.

Authors:  Satoyo Hosono; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Kimio Mizuno; Katsumi Sakakibara; Katsuji Matsuzawa; Akihiro Takeda; Michiyasu Kawai; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO).

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Alexander Reuss; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Philipp Harter; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jacobus Pfisterer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinomas.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Michele L Eno; Dwight D Im; Neil B Rosenshein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Intraepithelial T cells and tumor proliferation: impact on the benefit from surgical cytoreduction in advanced serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Adams; Douglas A Levine; Mark G Cadungog; Rachel Hammond; Andrea Facciabene; Narciso Olvera; Stephen C Rubin; Jeff Boyd; Phyllis A Gimotty; George Coukos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  13 in total

1.  Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Inga Steinberga; Kjell Jansson; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Bryant; Shaun Hiu; Patience T Kunonga; Ketankumar Gajjar; Dawn Craig; Luke Vale; Brett A Winter-Roach; Ahmed Elattar; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

3.  Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Coleridge; Andrew Bryant; Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

4.  Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Coleridge; Andrew Bryant; Thomas J Lyons; Richard J Goodall; Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Tetrandrine Reverses Paclitaxel Resistance in Human Ovarian Cancer via Inducing Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Arrest Through β-Catenin Pathway.

Authors:  Luo Jiang; Rui Hou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 predict primary optimal cytoreduction in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a preliminary model study.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Feng; Sheng-Bin Liao; Li Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Lv; Shihong Cui; Xiao'an Zhang; Chenchen Ren
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Upfront debulking surgery for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: current evidence.

Authors:  Orestis Tsonis; Fani Gkrozou; Konstantinos Vlachos; Minas Paschopoulos; Michail C Mitsis; Nikolaos Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou; Stergios Boussios; George Pappas-Gogos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

9.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Coleridge; Andrew Bryant; Sean Kehoe; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-30

10.  Patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: understanding the determinants of survival.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Cyrille Huchon; Lobna Ouldamer; Sofiane Bendifallah; Pierre Collinet; Alexandre Bricou; Emile Daraï; Marcos Ballester; Vincent Lavoue; Bassam Haddad; Cyril Touboul
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.