Literature DB >> 23849695

Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States.

Kathy Han1, Michael Milosevic, Anthony Fyles, Melania Pintilie, Akila N Viswanathan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in brachytherapy use in cervical cancer in the United States and to identify factors and survival benefits associated with brachytherapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 7359 patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) between 1988 and 2009. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between patients who received brachytherapy and those who did not from 2000 onward (after the National Cancer Institute alert recommending concurrent chemotherapy).
RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of the 7359 women received brachytherapy in combination with EBRT, and 37% received EBRT alone. The brachytherapy utilization rate has decreased from 83% in 1988 to 58% in 2009 (P<.001), with a sharp decline of 23% in 2003 to 43%. Factors associated with higher odds of brachytherapy use include younger age, married (vs single) patients, earlier years of diagnosis, earlier stage and certain SEER regions. In the propensity score-matched cohort, brachytherapy treatment was associated with higher 4-year cause-specific survival (CSS; 64.3% vs 51.5%, P<.001) and overall survival (OS; 58.2% vs 46.2%, P<.001). Brachytherapy treatment was independently associated with better CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.71), and OS (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: This population-based analysis reveals a concerning decline in brachytherapy utilization and significant geographic disparities in the delivery of brachytherapy in the United States. Brachytherapy use is independently associated with significantly higher CSS and OS and should be implemented in all feasible cases. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849695     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  110 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up results of simultaneous integrated or late course accelerated boost with external beam radiotherapy to vaginal cuff for high risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yaqin Zhao; Yali Shen; Pei Shu; Zhiping Li; Sen Bai; Feng Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Brachytherapy: where has it gone?

Authors:  Daniel G Petereit; Steven J Frank; Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; Patricia Eifel; Paul L Nguyen; David E Wazer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  [Accuracy of different image registration methods in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer].

Authors:  Qinghe Peng; Yinglin Peng; Jinhan Zhu; Mingzhan Cai; Linghong Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 4.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

5.  Scale-up of radiotherapy for cervical cancer in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination in low-income and middle-income countries: a model-based analysis of need and economic impact.

Authors:  Danielle Rodin; Emily A Burger; Rifat Atun; Michael Barton; Mary Gospodarowicz; Surbhi Grover; Timothy P Hanna; David A Jaffray; Felicia M Knaul; Yolande Lievens; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Brachytherapy in Gynecologic Cancers: Why Is It Underused?

Authors:  Kathy Han; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Authors:  Zhongshan Liu; Yangzhi Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Jing Sun; Xia Lin; Tiejun Wang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Disparities in the management and outcome of cervical cancer in the United States according to health insurance status.

Authors:  Thomas Churilla; Brian Egleston; Yanqun Dong; Talha Shaikh; Colin Murphy; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Christina Chu; Stephen Rubin; Penny Anderson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Real-time active MR-tracking of metallic stylets in MR-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Charles L Dumoulin; Akila N Viswanathan; Zion T H Tse; Alireza Mehrtash; Wolfgang Loew; Isaiah Norton; Junichi Tokuda; Ravi T Seethamraju; Tina Kapur; Antonio L Damato; Robert A Cormack; Ehud J Schmidt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance image guided brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kari Tanderup; Akila N Viswanathan; Christian Kirisits; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.