Literature DB >> 30514683

[Accuracy of different image registration methods in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer].

Qinghe Peng1,2, Yinglin Peng2, Jinhan Zhu2, Mingzhan Cai2, Linghong Zhou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of different methods for image registration in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer.
METHODS: The last treatment planning CT images (CT1) and the first treatment planning CT images (CT2) were acquired from 15 patients with cervical cancer and registered with different match image qualities (retained/removed catheter source in images) and different match regions [target only (S Group)/ interested organ structure (M Group)/body (L Group)] in Velocity3.2 software. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between the clinical target volumes (CTV) of the CT1 and CT2 images (CTVCT1 and CTVCT2, respectively) and between the organs-at-risk (OAR) of the two imaging datasets (OARCT1 and OARCT2, respectively) were used to evaluate the image registration accuracy.
RESULTS: The auto-segmentation volume of the catheter source using Velocity software based on the CT threshold was the closest to the actual volume within the CT value range of 1700-1800 HU. In the retained group, the DSC for the OARs of was better than or equal to that of the removed group, and the DSC value of the rectum was significantly improved (P < 0.05). For comparison of different match regions, the high-risk target volume (HRCTV) and the low-risk target volume (IRCTV) had the best precision for registration of the target area, which was significantly greater than that of M group and L group (P < 0.05). The M group had better registration accuracy of the target area and the best accuracy for the OARs. The DSC values of the bladder and rectum were significantly better than those of the other two groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The CT value range of 1700-1800 HU is optimal for automatic image segmentation using Velocity software. Automatic segmentation and shielding the volume of the catheter source can improve the image quality. We recommend the use of interested organ structures regions for image registration in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  applicator; cervical cancer; image registration; image-guided adaptive brachytherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514683      PMCID: PMC6744129          DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.11.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  16 in total

1.  Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology.

Authors:  Richard Pötter; Christine Haie-Meder; Erik Van Limbergen; Isabelle Barillot; Marisol De Brabandere; Johannes Dimopoulos; Isabelle Dumas; Beth Erickson; Stefan Lang; An Nulens; Peter Petrow; Jason Rownd; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Early clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided CT-planned high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for primary locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shane Mesko; Uma Swamy; Sang-June Park; Lalaine Borja; Jason Wang; D Jeffrey Demanes; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional.

Authors:  Kari Tanderup; Patricia J Eifel; Catheryn M Yashar; Richard Pötter; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Parametrial boosting in locally advanced cervical cancer: combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy vs. intracavitary brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sandy Mohamed; Jesper Kallehauge; Lars Fokdal; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Kari Tanderup
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  [Trend analysis of cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in Chinese women during 1989-2008].

Authors:  Shang-ying Hu; Rong-shou Zheng; Fang-hui Zhao; Si-wei Zhang; Wan-qing Chen; You-lin Qiao
Journal:  Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao       Date:  2014-04

6.  High-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy using two weekly sessions of 10 Gy each for patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Daya Nand Sharma; Goura Kisor Rath; Sanjay Thulkar; Sunesh Kumar; Vellaiyan Subramani; Parmod Kumar Julka
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Interstitial brachytherapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with cervical carcinoma not suitable for intracavitary radiation therapy.

Authors:  Daya Nand Sharma; Ajeet Kumar Gandhi; Seema Sharma; Goura Kisor Rath; Pandjatcharam Jagadesan; Pramod Kumar Julka
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kathy Han; Michael Milosevic; Anthony Fyles; Melania Pintilie; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Richard Pötter; Petra Georg; Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Magdalena Grimm; Daniel Berger; Nicole Nesvacil; Dietmar Georg; Maximilian P Schmid; Alexander Reinthaller; Alina Sturdza; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  The Incidence and Mortality of Cervical Cancer in Ningbo during 2006-2014, China.

Authors:  Hui Li; Donghui Duan; Jiaying Xu; Qinghai Gong; Yong Wang; Wei Ji; Lingbin DU; Liyuan Han; Guozhang Xu
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.429

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of bladder volume on treatment planning and clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shanshan Ma; Tingting Zhang; Li Jiang; Wen Qin; Keyu Lu; Yong Zhang; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Study on Appropriate Rectal Volume for External Irradiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Yanjiao Wu; Chunmei Liu; Wenyan Wang; Lei Tian; Zhiqing Xiao; Yanqiang Wang; Han Guo; Xiaoying Xue
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.