Literature DB >> 25879580

Long-term follow-up results of simultaneous integrated or late course accelerated boost with external beam radiotherapy to vaginal cuff for high risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy.

Xin Wang1,2, Yaqin Zhao3, Yali Shen4,5, Pei Shu6,7, Zhiping Li8,9, Sen Bai10, Feng Xu11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) or late course accelerated boost (LCAB) with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the vaginal cuff for high risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy.
METHODS: Between October 2009 and January 2012, patients with high risk cervical cancer who had undergone radical surgery followed by EBRT to the vaginal cuff were enrolled. Patients were treated with either intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with SIB (arm A) or IMRT/VMAT to the pelvis followed by LCAB (arm B) to vaginal cuff. In arm A, the pelvic and boost doses were 50.4 Gy and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. In arm B, pelvic irradiation to 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by a boost of 9 Gy in 3 fractions were delivered. Chemotherapy was given concurrently.
RESULTS: Overall, 80 patients were analyzed in this study (42 in arm A, 38 in arm B). In arm A and B, median follow-up was 37 and 32 months, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival in arms A vs B were 88.7% vs. 93.4% (p = 0.89), and 91.8% vs.100% (p = 0.21), respectively. The 3-year local-regional control and distant failure were 97.6% vs. 100% (p = 0.34), and 4.8% vs. 5.3% (p = 0.92), respectively. Grade 3-4 acute leukopenia and dermatitis were seen in 11 (26.2%) and 8 (19.0%) patients in Arm A, vs. 7 (17.8%) and 6 (15.8%) patients in Arm B, respectively (p > 0.05). Only Grade 1-2 chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that both SIB and LCAB to vaginal cuff for high risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy are associated with excellent survival, local control and low toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25879580      PMCID: PMC4397733          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1248-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  32 in total

1.  American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy after hysterectomy.

Authors:  William Small; Sushil Beriwal; D Jeffrey Demanes; Kathryn E Dusenbery; Patricia Eifel; Beth Erickson; Ellen Jones; Jason J Rownd; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Akila N Viswanathan; David Gaffney
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Arno J Mundt; Anthony E Lujan; Jacob Rotmensch; Steven E Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Gini Fleming; John C Roeske
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  J C Roeske; A Lujan; J Rotmensch; S E Waggoner; D Yamada; A J Mundt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Postoperative pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael R Folkert; Karin K Shih; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Elizabeth Jewell; Marisa A Kollmeier; Vicky Makker; Richard R Barakat; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  William Small; Loren K Mell; Penny Anderson; Carien Creutzberg; Jennifer De Los Santos; David Gaffney; Anuja Jhingran; Lorraine Portelance; Tracey Schefter; Revathy Iyer; Mahesh Varia; Kathryn Winter; Arno J Mundt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy after surgery for high-risk, early stage cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Miao-Fen Chen; Chih-Jen Tseng; Ching-Cheng Tseng; Chun-Yen Yu; Chun-Te Wu; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.

Authors:  Wilko F A R Verbakel; Johan P Cuijpers; Daan Hoffmans; Michael Bieker; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  CyberKnife Boost for Patients with Cervical Cancer Unable to Undergo Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Andrew Haas; Matthew R Witten; Owen Clancey; Karen Episcopia; Diane Accordino; Eva Chalas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Whole pelvic helical tomotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: technical implementation of IMRT with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Ming-Chow Wei; Hsing-Yi Lee; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Chien-An Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Tung-Hu Tsai; Yu-Jen Chen; Pei-Wei Shueng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of simultaneous integrated boost vs sequential intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer patients: A population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yao-Hung Kuo; Ji-An Liang; Tang-Chuan Wang; Chun-Jung Juan; Chia-Chin Li; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  IMAT-IGRT Treatment with Simultaneous Integrated Boost as Dose Escalation for Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Single Institution, Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zoltán Lőcsei; Klára Sebestyén; Zsolt Sebestyén; Eszter Fehér; Dorottya Soltész; Zoltán Musch; László Csaba Mangel
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.201

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.