Literature DB >> 23849646

Analysis of rumen microbial populations in lactating dairy cattle fed diets varying in carbohydrate profiles and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product.

C R Mullins1, L K Mamedova, A J Carpenter, Y Ying, M S Allen, I Yoon, B J Bradford.   

Abstract

The rumen microbial ecosystem is a critical factor that links diets to bovine physiology and productivity; however, information about dietary effects on microbial populations has generally been limited to small numbers of samples and qualitative assessment. To assess whether consistent shifts in microbial populations occur in response to common dietary manipulations in dairy cattle, samples of rumen contents were collected from 2 studies for analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). In one study, lactating Holstein cows (n=8) were fed diets in which a nonforage fiber source replaced an increasing proportion of forages and concentrates in a 4×4 Latin square design, and samples of ruminal digesta were collected at 9-h intervals over 3 d at the end of each period. In the second study, lactating Holstein cows (n=15) were fed diets with or without the inclusion of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP) in a crossover design. In this study, rumen liquid and solid samples were collected during total rumen evacuations before and after feeding in a 42-h period. In total, 146 samples of ruminal digesta were used for microbial DNA isolation and analysis by qPCR. Validated primer sets were used to quantify total bacterial and anaerobic fungal populations as well as 12 well-studied bacterial taxa. The relative abundance of the target populations was similar to those previously reported. No significant treatment effects were observed for any target population. A significant interaction of treatment and dry matter intake was observed, however, for the abundance of Eubacterium ruminantium. Increasing dry matter intake was associated with a quadratic decrease in E. ruminantium populations in control animals but with a quadratic increase in E.ruminantium populations in cows fed SCFP. Analysis of sample time effects revealed that Fibrobacter succinogenes and fungal populations were more abundant postfeeding, whereas Ruminococcus albus tended to be more abundant prefeeding. Seven of the target taxa were more abundant in either the liquid or solid fractions of ruminal digesta. By accounting for the total mass of liquid and solid fractions in the rumen and the relative abundance of total bacteria in each fraction, it was estimated that 92% of total bacteria were found in the solid digesta fraction.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microbial DNA; quantitative real-time PCR; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849646     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  16 in total

1.  Ruminally protected and unprotected Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers1.

Authors:  Yizhao Shen; Taylor Davedow; Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Ilkyu Yoon; Claudia Narvaez; Tim Angus Mcallister; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Adaptation of the cecal bacterial microbiome of growing pigs in response to resistant starch type 4.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Evelyne Mann; Dietmar Grüll; Timea Molnar; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production.

Authors:  Kristi M Cammack; Kathleen J Austin; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant; Hannah C Cunningham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Variation in animal performance explained by the rumen microbiome or by diet composition.

Authors:  Claire B Gleason; Robin R White
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Response of Milk Performance, Rumen and Hindgut Microbiome to Dietary Supplementation with Aspergillus oryzae Fermentation Extracts in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jiyou Zhang; Wei Jin; Yun Jiang; Fei Xie; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Diet Supplementation With Sulfur Amino Acids Modulated Fermentation Metabolome and Gut Microbiome in Goats.

Authors:  Tsegay Teklebrhan; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Effect of Freezing Conditions on Fecal Bacterial Composition in Pigs.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Peadar G Lawlor; Elizabeth Magowan; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  High-throughput Methods Redefine the Rumen Microbiome and Its Relationship with Nutrition and Metabolism.

Authors:  Joshua C McCann; Tryon A Wickersham; Juan J Loor
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2014-06-08

9.  Fibre digestibility, abundance of faecal bacteria and plasma acetate concentrations in overweight adult mares.

Authors:  Megan L Shepherd; Monica A Ponder; Amy O Burk; Stewart C Milton; William S Swecker
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2014-05-07

Review 10.  Live Yeast and Yeast Cell Wall Supplements Enhance Immune Function and Performance in Food-Producing Livestock: A Review (†,)(‡).

Authors:  Paul R Broadway; Jeffery A Carroll; Nicole C Burdick Sanchez
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2015-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.