Literature DB >> 26431973

Adaptation of the cecal bacterial microbiome of growing pigs in response to resistant starch type 4.

Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli1, Stephan Schmitz-Esser2, Evelyne Mann2, Dietmar Grüll3, Timea Molnar3, Qendrim Zebeli4.   

Abstract

Resistant starch (RS) exacerbates health benefits on the host via modulation of the gut bacterial community. By far, these effects have been less well explored for RS of type 4. This study aimed at gaining a community-wide insight into the impact of enzymatically modified starch (EMS) on the cecal microbiota and hindgut fermentation in growing pigs. Castrated male pigs (n = 12/diet; 29-kg body weight) were fed diets with either 70% EMS or control starch for 10 days. The bacterial profile of each cecal sample was determined by sequencing of the V345 region of the 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina MiSeq platform. EMS diet reduced short-chain fatty acid concentrations in cecum and proximal colon compared to the control diet. Linear discriminant analyses and K means clustering indicated diet-specific cecal community profiles, whereby diversity and species richness were not different among diets. Pigs showed host-specific variation in their most abundant phyla, Firmicutes (55%), Proteobacteria (35%), and Bacteroidetes (10%). The EMS diet decreased abundance of Ruminococcus, Parasutterella, Bilophila, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus operational taxonomic units (OTU), whereas Meniscus and Actinobacillus OTU were increased compared to those with the control diet (P < 0.05). Quantitative PCR confirmed results for host effect on Enterobacteriaceae and diet effect on members of the Lactobacillus group. The presence of less cecal short-chain fatty acids and the imputed metabolic functions of the cecal microbiome suggested that EMS was less degradable for cecal bacteria than the control starch. The present EMS effects on the bacterial community profiles were different than the previously reported RS effects and can be linked to the chemical structure of EMS.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431973      PMCID: PMC4644661          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02756-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

1.  Open source clustering software.

Authors:  M J L de Hoon; S Imoto; J Nolan; S Miyano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Secondary structure improves OTU assignments of 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut metabolism.

Authors:  Harry J Flint; Sylvia H Duncan; Karen P Scott; Petra Louis
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 6.297

4.  Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations.

Authors:  Torey Looft; Heather K Allen; Brandi L Cantarel; Uri Y Levine; Darrell O Bayles; David P Alt; Bernard Henrissat; Thaddeus B Stanton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Processing barley grain with lactic acid and tannic acid ameliorates rumen microbial fermentation and degradation of dietary fibre in vitro.

Authors:  Kathrin Deckardt; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Nonstarch polysaccharides modulate bacterial microbiota, pathways for butyrate production, and abundance of pathogenic Escherichia coli in the pig gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Seema Hooda; Robert Pieper; Ruurd T Zijlstra; Andrew G van Kessel; Rainer Mosenthin; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.

Authors:  David M Stevenson; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production.

Authors:  Sandra Macfarlane; George T Macfarlane
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.297

9.  The regulatory effects of resistant starch on glycaemic response in obese dogs.

Authors:  Tohru Kimura
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Resistant starch diet induces change in the swine microbiome and a predominance of beneficial bacterial populations.

Authors:  Özgün C O Umu; Jeremy A Frank; Jonatan U Fangel; Marije Oostindjer; Carol Souza da Silva; Elizabeth J Bolhuis; Guido Bosch; William G T Willats; Phillip B Pope; Dzung B Diep
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 14.650

View more
  27 in total

1.  Individual and Site-Specific Variation in a Biogeographical Profile of the Coyote Gastrointestinal Microbiota.

Authors:  Scott Sugden; Colleen Cassady St Clair; Lisa Y Stein
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Defining the role of Parasutterella, a previously uncharacterized member of the core gut microbiota.

Authors:  Tingting Ju; Ji Yoon Kong; Paul Stothard; Benjamin P Willing
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.

Authors:  Ursula M McCormack; Tânia Curião; Stefan G Buzoianu; Maria L Prieto; Tomas Ryan; Patrick Varley; Fiona Crispie; Elizabeth Magowan; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Donagh Berry; Orla O'Sullivan; Paul D Cotter; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Dietary Phytase- and Lactic Acid-Treated Cereals Caused Greater Taxonomic Adaptations than Functional Adaptations in the Cecal Metagenome of Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Jutamat Klinsoda; Julia Vötterl; Simone Koger; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Age-related compositional and functional changes in micro-pig gut microbiome.

Authors:  Mi Young Lim; Eun-Ji Song; Kyung Soo Kang; Young-Do Nam
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 7.713

6.  Effect of feeding acidified or fermented barley using Limosilactobacillus reuteri with or without supplemental phytase on diet nutrient digestibility in growing pigs.

Authors:  Charlotte M E Heyer; Li F Wang; Eduardo Beltranena; Michael G Gänzle; Ruurd T Zijlstra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of dietary intake of potatoes on body weight gain, satiety-related hormones, and gut microbiota in healthy rats.

Authors:  Yu Wu; Honghai Hu; Xiaofeng Dai; Huilian Che; Hong Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Effect of Freezing Conditions on Fecal Bacterial Composition in Pigs.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Peadar G Lawlor; Elizabeth Magowan; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Microbiome-Metabolome Responses in the Cecum and Colon of Pig to a High Resistant Starch Diet.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Yong Su; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Enzymatically Modified Starch Favorably Modulated Intestinal Transit Time and Hindgut Fermentation in Growing Pigs.

Authors:  M A Newman; Q Zebeli; K Velde; D Grüll; T Molnar; W Kandler; B U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.