Literature DB >> 23848943

Identifying wound prevalence using the Mobile Wound Care program.

Judi Walker1, Marianne Cullen, Helen Chambers, Eleanor Mitchell, Nicole Steers, Hanan Khalil.   

Abstract

Measuring the prevalence of wounds within health care systems is a challenging and complex undertaking. This is often compounded by the clinicians' training, the availability of the required data to collect, incomplete documentation and lack of reporting of this type of data across the various health care settings. To date, there is little published data on wound prevalence across regions or states. This study aims to identify the number and types of wounds treated in the Gippsland area using the Mobile Wound Care (MWC™) program. The MWC program has enabled clinicians in Gippsland to collect data on wounds managed by district nurses from four health services. The main outcomes measured were patient characteristics, wound characteristics and treatment characteristics of wounds in Gippsland. These data create several clinical and research opportunities. The identification of predominant wound aetiologies in Gippsland provides a basis on which to determine a regional wound prospective and the impact of the regional epidemiology. Training that incorporates best practice guidelines can be tailored to the most prevalent wound types. Clinical pathways that encompass the Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the management of venous leg ulcers can be introduced and the clinical and economical outcomes can be quantitatively measured. The MWC allows healing times (days) to be benchmarked both regionally and against established literature, for example, venous leg ulcers.
© 2013 The Author. International Wound Journal © 2013 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healing time; Mobile Wound Care program; Wound cost; Wound prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23848943      PMCID: PMC7950525          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  8 in total

1.  The resource costs of wound care in Bradford and Airedale primary care trust in the UK.

Authors:  K Vowden; P Vowden; J Posnett
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Identifying wound prevalence using the Mobile Wound Care program.

Authors:  Judi Walker; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Eleanor Mitchell; Nicole Steers; Hanan Khalil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Home care nurses' ratings of appropriateness of wound treatments and wound healing.

Authors:  Barbara Pieper; Thomas Templin; May Dobal; Ada Jacox
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  Implementation of a successful electronic wound documentation system in rural Victoria, Australia: a subject of collaboration and community engagement.

Authors:  Hanan Khalil; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Nicole Steers; Judi Walker
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Prevalence of chronic wounds in Quebec home care: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Isabel Rodrigues; Marie-Françoise Mégie
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Results of a comprehensive hospital-based wound survey.

Authors:  E Mahé; G Langlois; G Baron; L Girard; A Macrez; C Fargeot; B Crickx
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Point prevalence of wounds in a sample of acute hospitals in Canada.

Authors:  Theresa Hurd; John Posnett
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  A point prevalence survey of wounds in north-east England.

Authors:  N Srinivasaiah; H Dugdall; S Barrett; P J Drew
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.072

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia.

Authors:  Rosana E Norman; Michelle Gibb; Anthony Dyer; Jennifer Prentice; Stephen Yelland; Qinglu Cheng; Peter A Lazzarini; Keryln Carville; Karen Innes-Walker; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Edward Burn; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Identifying wound prevalence using the Mobile Wound Care program.

Authors:  Judi Walker; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Eleanor Mitchell; Nicole Steers; Hanan Khalil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Reduction in wound healing times, cost of consumables and number of visits treated through the implementation of an electronic wound care system in rural Australia.

Authors:  Hanan Khalil; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Matthew Carroll; Judi Walker
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Chronic wounds in Australia: A systematic review of key epidemiological and clinical parameters.

Authors:  Laura McCosker; Ruth Tulleners; Qinglu Cheng; Stefan Rohmer; Tamzin Pacella; Nick Graves; Rosana Pacella
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Medications affecting healing: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Hanan Khalil; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Matthew McGrail
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  An Overview of Cellulose Derivatives-Based Dressings for Wound-Healing Management.

Authors:  Elena-Emilia Tudoroiu; Cristina-Elena Dinu-Pîrvu; Mădălina Georgiana Albu Kaya; Lăcrămioara Popa; Valentina Anuța; Răzvan Mihai Prisada; Mihaela Violeta Ghica
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.