Literature DB >> 19247229

The resource costs of wound care in Bradford and Airedale primary care trust in the UK.

K Vowden1, P Vowden, J Posnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the resource costs of providing wound care for the 488,000 catchment population of the Bradford and Airedale primary care trust (PCT).
METHOD: A wound survey was carried out over a one-week period in March 2007 covering three hospitals in two acute trusts, district nurses, nursing homes and residential homes within the geographical area defined by the PCT. The survey included information on the frequency of dressing change, treatment time and district nurse travel time. The resource costs of wound care in the PCT were estimated by combining this information with representative costs for the UK National Health Service and information on dressing spend.
RESULTS: Prevalence of patients with a wound was 3.55 per 1000 population. The majority of wounds were surgical/trauma (48%), leg/foot (28%) and pressure ulcers (21%). Prevalence of wounds among hospital inpatients was 30.7%. Of these, 11.6% were pressure ulcers, of which 66% were hospital-acquired. The attributable cost of wound care in 2006-2007 was pounds 9.89 million: pounds 2.03 million per 100,000 population and 1.44% of the local health-care budget. Costs included pounds 1.69 million spending on dressings, 45.4 full-time nurses (valued at pounds 3.076 million) and 60-61 acute hospital beds (valued at pounds 5.13 million).
CONCLUSION: The cost of wound care is significant. The most important components are the costs of wound-related hospitalisation and the opportunity cost of nurse time. The 32% of patients treated in hospital accounted for 63% of total costs. Putting in place care pathways to avoid hospitalisation and avoiding the development of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and other wound complications are important ways to reduce costs. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: John Posnett is an employee of Smith & Nephew.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247229     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.3.39814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  20 in total

1.  Identifying wound prevalence using the Mobile Wound Care program.

Authors:  Judi Walker; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Eleanor Mitchell; Nicole Steers; Hanan Khalil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Reduction in wound healing times, cost of consumables and number of visits treated through the implementation of an electronic wound care system in rural Australia.

Authors:  Hanan Khalil; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Matthew Carroll; Judi Walker
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  The economic benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in community-based wound care in the NHS.

Authors:  Caroline Dowsett; Lynn Davis; Valerie Henderson; Richard Searle
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors:  Christina Lindholm; Richard Searle
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Analgesic efficacy of equimolar 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen gas premix (Kalinox®) as compared with a 5% eutectic mixture of lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA®) in chronic leg ulcer debridement.

Authors:  Juerg Traber; Ulrike Held; Maria Signer; Tobias Huebner; Stefan Arndt; Thomas A Neff
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Suboptimal identification of patient-specific risk factors for poor wound healing can be improved by simple interventions.

Authors:  Lauren S Harris; Joshua E Luck; Rachel R Atherton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Characterisation of baseline microbiological and host factors in an inception cohort of people with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention reveals circulating IL-6 levels as a potential predictive biomarker of healing.

Authors:  Hannah Buckley; Jo Dumville; Michael Hodgkinson; Debbie Wearmouth; Gavin Barlow; Marjan van der Woude; Nicky Cullum; Ian Chetter; Dimitris Lagos
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-11-19

Review 8.  Compression for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Nicky Cullum; E Andrea Nelson; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 9.  Alginate dressings for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Marrissa Martyn-St James; Una J Adderley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-19

10.  Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Emma Connaughton; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.