PURPOSE: Anteroposterior (AP) joint translation is an important indicator of good clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the in vivo relationship between changes in the degree of voluntary soft tissue tension and flexion angle versus simultaneous AP translation after TKA. METHODS: A posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining meniscal-bearing design was investigated in 20 knees of 20 patients. AP translation was measured at 30° and 75° flexion with the KT-2000 arthrometer while patients were anesthetized and non-anesthetized. RESULTS: The mean translations at 30° and 75° were 10.5 and 10.4 mm, respectively, in non-anesthetized patients and 13.8 and 12.7 mm, respectively, in patients under anesthesia. AP translation showed a significant positive correlation with soft tissue tension (p < 0.001), but not with flexion angle (p = 0.366). No interaction was observed between soft tissue tension and the flexion angle in terms of AP translation (p = 0.431). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should recognize that AP translation is greater in anesthetized patients than in non-anesthetized patients, regardless of the flexion angle, with no significant correlation between flexion angle and translation, regardless of the level of consciousness. Because conformity between the tibial insert and femoral component decreases with flexion, whereas the opposing effects of supporting structures, such as muscles, ligaments, and capsules, increases, proper soft tissue tension, particularly retention of a functional PCL, could have an important role in determining AP translation in the current prosthesis design.
PURPOSE: Anteroposterior (AP) joint translation is an important indicator of good clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the in vivo relationship between changes in the degree of voluntary soft tissue tension and flexion angle versus simultaneous AP translation after TKA. METHODS: A posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining meniscal-bearing design was investigated in 20 knees of 20 patients. AP translation was measured at 30° and 75° flexion with the KT-2000 arthrometer while patients were anesthetized and non-anesthetized. RESULTS: The mean translations at 30° and 75° were 10.5 and 10.4 mm, respectively, in non-anesthetized patients and 13.8 and 12.7 mm, respectively, in patients under anesthesia. AP translation showed a significant positive correlation with soft tissue tension (p < 0.001), but not with flexion angle (p = 0.366). No interaction was observed between soft tissue tension and the flexion angle in terms of AP translation (p = 0.431). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should recognize that AP translation is greater in anesthetized patients than in non-anesthetized patients, regardless of the flexion angle, with no significant correlation between flexion angle and translation, regardless of the level of consciousness. Because conformity between the tibial insert and femoral component decreases with flexion, whereas the opposing effects of supporting structures, such as muscles, ligaments, and capsules, increases, proper soft tissue tension, particularly retention of a functional PCL, could have an important role in determining AP translation in the current prosthesis design.
Authors: Julien Chouteau; Jean Luc Lerat; Rodolph Testa; Bernard Moyen; Scott A Banks; Banks A Scott Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 4.757