Literature DB >> 30980120

Coronal and sagittal laxity affects clinical outcomes in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: assessment of well-functioning knees.

Toshifumi Watanabe1,2, Hideyuki Koga3, Hiroki Katagiri3, Koji Otabe3, Yusuke Nakagawa3, Takeshi Muneta3, Ichiro Sekiya3, Tetsuya Jinno3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Both coronal and sagittal laxity of well-functioning knees after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was examined, and the correlations between the joint laxity and the clinical outcomes were analyzed to clarify the adequate joint laxity for the prosthesis, and the relationship between the laxity and the outcomes.
METHODS: Forty well-functioning TKA knees with a high-flexion posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis were studied. All patients were diagnosed as having osteoarthritis with varus deformity and were followed up for 2 years or more. The coronal and sagittal laxity was assessed at extension and flexion, and the correlations between the joint laxity and the clinical outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: The varus and valgus laxity averaged 5.6 ± 1.8° and 3.6 ± 1.2° at 10° knee flexion, and 7.4 ± 5.1° and 3.6 ± 2.7° at 80° knee flexion, respectively, and the AP laxity at 30° and 75° knee flexion averaged 8.7 ± 3.6 mm and 6.6 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. Knee flexion angle correlated with the joint laxity, while the other outcomes including patient-reported pain and instability were adversely affected by the greater laxity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study exhibited the importance of consistent medial laxity both at extension and flexion, which averaged 3.6°. Care should be taken to maintain the medial stability and to obtain adequate laxity both at extension and flexion during surgery. A few degrees of medial tightness can be allowed to achieve excellent clinical results after TKA for preoperative varus knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Coronal and sagittal laxity; Patient-reported outcomes; Posterior-stabilized prosthesis; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 30980120     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05500-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Laxity in posterior cruciate sparing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses.

Authors:  D Dejour; G Deschamps; L Garotta; H Dejour
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Influence of stability on range of motion after cruciate-retaining TKA.

Authors:  Kotaro Yamakado; Katsuhiko Kitaoka; Hiroshi Yamada; Kensaku Hashiba; Ryuichi Nakamura; Katsuro Tomita
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Asymmetry of mediolateral laxity of the normal knee.

Authors:  Ken Okazaki; Hiromasa Miura; Shuichi Matsuda; Naohide Takeuchi; Taro Mawatari; Makoto Hashizume; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.601

4.  The Influence of Postoperative Knee Stability on Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kamenaga; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Yutaro Kanda; Hidetoshi Miya; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Assessing coronal laxity in extension and flexion at a minimum of 10 years after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasushi Yoshihara; Yuji Arai; Shuji Nakagawa; Hiroaki Inoue; Keiichiro Ueshima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Ryo Oda; Daigo Taniguchi; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Extension gap needs more than 1-mm laxity after implantation to avoid post-operative flexion contracture in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigetoshi Okamoto; Ken Okazaki; Hiroaki Mitsuyasu; Shuichi Matsuda; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Does knee stability in the coronal plane in extension affect function and outcome after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakahara; Ken Okazaki; Satoshi Hamai; Shigetoshi Okamoto; Umito Kuwashima; Hidehiko Higaki; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Changes in anteroposterior stability and proprioception after different types of knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Delphine Wautier; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Closed Suction Drainage Is Not Necessary for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study on Simultaneous Bilateral Surgeries of a Mean Follow-Up of 5.5 Years.

Authors:  Toshifumi Watanabe; Takeshi Muneta; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Kenji Hara; Hideyuki Koga; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Varus-valgus stability at 90° flexion correlates with the stability at midflexion range more widely than that at 0° extension in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunori Hino; Tatsuhiko Kutsuna; Kunihiko Watamori; Hiroshi Kiyomatsu; Yasumitsu Ishimaru; Jun Takeba; Seiji Watanabe; Yoshitaka Shiraishi; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  1 in total

1.  Small soft tissue tension changes do not affect patient-reported outcomes one year after primary TKA.

Authors:  Ethan Krell; Amethia Joseph; Joseph Nguyen; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.