N Verma1, P Willeke, P Bicsán, P Lebiedz, H Pavenstädt, P Kümpers. 1. Medizinische Klinik D, Abteilung für Allg. Innere Medizin, Nephrologie und Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In elderly patients, an unspecific increase of fibrin degradation products in blood is observed. Thus, the D-dimer test to rule out thromboembolic events has a high false-positive rate in elderly patients. Our aim was to validate an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off and to assess its utility in elderly patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of outpatients (n = 1033) presenting to our emergency department with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis (PE/DVT), age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values were derived using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Subsequently, the proportion of patients with normal D-dimer and false-negative test results, respectively, and the number needed-to-test (NNT) were compared for conventional and age-adjusted cut-off values. RESULTS: Using the conventional cut-off of 0.5 mg/dl, PE/DVT could be excluded in 68 % of patients, whereas the age-adjusted cut-off [(age × 0.016) mg/l] ruled out 77 % of patients. Particularly in patients > 70 years, the negative prediction accuracy of excluding a PE/DVT increased explicitly. The failure rate of the age-adjusted cut-off value was 0.8 % (95 % confidence interval 0.3-1.6 %). CONCLUSION: The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off point increases the proportion of older patients, in whom an acute thromboembolic event can be excluded.
BACKGROUND: In elderly patients, an unspecific increase of fibrin degradation products in blood is observed. Thus, the D-dimer test to rule out thromboembolic events has a high false-positive rate in elderly patients. Our aim was to validate an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off and to assess its utility in elderly patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of outpatients (n = 1033) presenting to our emergency department with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis (PE/DVT), age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values were derived using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Subsequently, the proportion of patients with normal D-dimer and false-negative test results, respectively, and the number needed-to-test (NNT) were compared for conventional and age-adjusted cut-off values. RESULTS: Using the conventional cut-off of 0.5 mg/dl, PE/DVT could be excluded in 68 % of patients, whereas the age-adjusted cut-off [(age × 0.016) mg/l] ruled out 77 % of patients. Particularly in patients > 70 years, the negative prediction accuracy of excluding a PE/DVT increased explicitly. The failure rate of the age-adjusted cut-off value was 0.8 % (95 % confidence interval 0.3-1.6 %). CONCLUSION: The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off point increases the proportion of older patients, in whom an acute thromboembolic event can be excluded.
Authors: Marc Righini; Drahomir Aujesky; Pierre-Marie Roy; Jacques Cornuz; Philippe de Moerloose; Henri Bounameaux; Arnaud Perrier Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004 Dec 13-27
Authors: P S Wells; D R Anderson; M Rodger; J S Ginsberg; C Kearon; M Gent; A G Turpie; J Bormanis; J Weitz; M Chamberlain; D Bowie; D Barnes; J Hirsh Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Arne van Belle; Harry R Büller; Menno V Huisman; Peter M Huisman; Karin Kaasjager; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Mark H H Kramer; Marieke J H A Kruip; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Frank W G Leebeek; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Martin H Prins; Maaike Sohne; Lidwine W Tick Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Penaloza; P-M Roy; J Kline; F Verschuren; G LE Gal; S Quentin-Georget; N Delvau; F Thys Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Henrike J Schouten; H L Dineke Koek; Ruud Oudega; Geert-Jan Geersing; Kristel J M Janssen; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-06-06
Authors: S Pena Karan; U Oltmanns; D E Optazaite; M Klauß; H A Katus; S J Buß; C P Heußel Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 0.840