Literature DB >> 22568451

Performance of age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to rule out pulmonary embolism.

A Penaloza1, P-M Roy, J Kline, F Verschuren, G LE Gal, S Quentin-Georget, N Delvau, F Thys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off has recently been proposed to increase D-dimer usefulness in older patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE).
OBJECTIVE: We externally validated this age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off using different D-dimer assays in a multicenter sample of emergency department patients.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of three prospectively collected databases (two European, one American) of patients suspected of having PE. D-dimer performance for ruling out PE was assessed by calculating negative likelihood ratio (nLR) for D-dimer with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (< age × 10 in patients over 50 years) and with conventional cut-off (< 500 μg dL(-1)). Test efficiency was assessed by the number needed to test (NNT) to rule out PE in one patient.
RESULTS: Among 4537 patients included, overall PE prevalence was 10.1%. In the overall population, nLR was 0.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.09) with conventional cut-off and 0.08 (0.05-0.12) with age-adjusted cut-off. Using age-adjusted cut-off, nLR was 0.08, 0.09 and 0.06 for Vidas(®) , Liatest(®) and MDA(®) assays, respectively. Use of age-adjusted cut-off produced a favorable effect on NNT in the elderly; the greatest decrease was observed in patients > 75 years: NTT halved from 8.1 to 3.6. The proportion of patients over 75 years with normal D-dimer was doubled (27.9% vs. 12.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that age-adjusted D-dimer had low nLR, allowing its use as a rule-out PE strategy in non-high pretest clinical probability patients, as well as using Vidas(®), Liatest(®) or MDA(®) assays. This age-adjusted cut-off increased clinical usefulness of D-dimer in older patients. A large prospective study is required to confirm these results.
© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22568451     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  12 in total

1.  [Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs to diagnose thromboembolic events: validation in an emergency department].

Authors:  N Verma; P Willeke; P Bicsán; P Lebiedz; H Pavenstädt; P Kümpers
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Fay Crawford; Alina Andras; Karen Welch; Karen Sheares; David Keeling; Francesca M Chappell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 3.  Diagnosis of suspected venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  Can the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value help in our diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism? .

Authors:  Jonathan Dutton; Martin Dachsel; Rachel Crane
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Bilateral optic disc swelling as a presenting sign of superior sagittal sinus thrombosis.

Authors:  Grant Jason Pakter
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-17

6.  Impact of unsuspected subsegmental pulmonary embolism in ICU patients.

Authors:  C Koch; R Schramm; F C Roller; A Hecker; M Henrich; E Schneck; G Krombach; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Clinical usefulness and safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to exclude pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Julio Flores; Jaime García de Tena; Javier Galipienzo; Ángel García-Avello; Esteban Pérez-Rodríguez; José Ignacio Tortuero; Concepción Álvarez; Antonio Ruíz; Ignacio Arribas
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Plasma D-Dimer Levels for Predicting Stroke Outcome.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Chun Wang; Junhua Wu; Shiliang Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henrike J Schouten; G J Geersing; H L Koek; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Kristel J M Janssen; Renée A Douma; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-03

Review 10.  COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy and Inflammatory Response: What Do We Know Already and What Are the Knowledge Gaps?

Authors:  Klaus Görlinger; Daniel Dirkmann; Ajay Gandhi; Paolo Simioni
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.